Trust in family doctor-patient relations: an embeddedness theory perspective.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH BMC Public Health Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1186/s12889-024-20805-1
Ting Ye, Wenqi Xiao, Yilin Li, Yuan Xiao, Huiyan Fang, Weizhuo Chen, Shan Lu
{"title":"Trust in family doctor-patient relations: an embeddedness theory perspective.","authors":"Ting Ye, Wenqi Xiao, Yilin Li, Yuan Xiao, Huiyan Fang, Weizhuo Chen, Shan Lu","doi":"10.1186/s12889-024-20805-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Based on the embeddedness theory, the present study aims to explore the association between patients' trust in family doctors (Interpersonal Trust), trust in community health centers (Organizational Trust), and trust in society as a whole (Social Trust).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted in six community health centers in China, using partial least squares structural equation modeling to assess trust scale reliability and validity while testing hypotheses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The scores of Interpersonal Trust, Organizational Trust, and Social Trust were 3.761, 3.636, and 3.635, respectively. Our findings confirm that Interpersonal Trust is positively associated with Organizational Trust (β = 0.916, p < 0.001), Organizational Trust is positively associated with Social Trust (β = 0.617, p < 0.001) and Interpersonal Trust (β = 0.864, p < 0.001), and Social Trust is positively associated with Organizational Trust (β = 0.784, p < 0.001). However, the relationship between Interpersonal Trust and Social Trust was not demonstrated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study enhances our understanding of patient trust in family doctors. Applying embeddedness theory, we reveal positive correlations between Social Trust and Organizational Trust, as well as between Organizational Trust and Interpersonal Trust. Moreover, we have identified Organizational Trust as a crucial mediator in the relationship between Interpersonal Trust and Social Trust.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"3278"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-20805-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Based on the embeddedness theory, the present study aims to explore the association between patients' trust in family doctors (Interpersonal Trust), trust in community health centers (Organizational Trust), and trust in society as a whole (Social Trust).

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in six community health centers in China, using partial least squares structural equation modeling to assess trust scale reliability and validity while testing hypotheses.

Results: The scores of Interpersonal Trust, Organizational Trust, and Social Trust were 3.761, 3.636, and 3.635, respectively. Our findings confirm that Interpersonal Trust is positively associated with Organizational Trust (β = 0.916, p < 0.001), Organizational Trust is positively associated with Social Trust (β = 0.617, p < 0.001) and Interpersonal Trust (β = 0.864, p < 0.001), and Social Trust is positively associated with Organizational Trust (β = 0.784, p < 0.001). However, the relationship between Interpersonal Trust and Social Trust was not demonstrated.

Conclusions: This study enhances our understanding of patient trust in family doctors. Applying embeddedness theory, we reveal positive correlations between Social Trust and Organizational Trust, as well as between Organizational Trust and Interpersonal Trust. Moreover, we have identified Organizational Trust as a crucial mediator in the relationship between Interpersonal Trust and Social Trust.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭医患关系中的信任:嵌入理论视角。
研究背景基于嵌入理论,本研究旨在探讨患者对家庭医生的信任(人际信任)、对社区卫生服务中心的信任(组织信任)和对整个社会的信任(社会信任)之间的关系:方法:在中国 6 家社区卫生服务中心进行横断面调查,采用偏最小二乘结构方程模型评估信任量表的信度和效度,同时检验假设:人际信任、组织信任和社会信任的得分分别为 3.761、3.636 和 3.635。我们的研究结果证实,人际信任与组织信任呈正相关(β = 0.916,p):本研究加深了我们对患者对家庭医生信任的理解。运用嵌入理论,我们揭示了社会信任与组织信任之间以及组织信任与人际信任之间的正相关关系。此外,我们还发现组织信任是人际信任和社会信任之间关系的重要中介。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
期刊最新文献
The relationship between physical activity level and timing and sleep quality and hygiene in healthy individuals: a cross-sectional study. Beliefs underlying weight control behaviors among adolescents and emerging adults living with obesity: an elicitation qualitative study. Advanced liver fibrosis, but not MASLD, is associated with accelerated biological aging: a population-based study. Association between metabolic phenotypes and incident pre-sarcopenia: 3 years follow-up of Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Association between sleep and gallstone disease in United States adults: A cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1