Incidence and risk factor of blood transfusion after abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a 10-year retrospective study of the US nationwide inpatient sample.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY BMC Cancer Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1186/s12885-024-13216-3
Chuan Chen, BenLi Zhu, Youfeng Wang, Yangyang Zhao, Gang Chen, Ying Peng, Ying Peng, Xinyu Wang, Hao Xie, Ying Zhou, Juan Lin
{"title":"Incidence and risk factor of blood transfusion after abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a 10-year retrospective study of the US nationwide inpatient sample.","authors":"Chuan Chen, BenLi Zhu, Youfeng Wang, Yangyang Zhao, Gang Chen, Ying Peng, Ying Peng, Xinyu Wang, Hao Xie, Ying Zhou, Juan Lin","doi":"10.1186/s12885-024-13216-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the rising prevalence of abdominal radical hysterectomy, the need for perioperative blood transfusion has emerged as a significant clinical challenge. Independent risk factors for blood transfusion during abdominal radical hysterectomy remains limited, and identifying these factors is needed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of data was performed using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), focusing on patients who underwent abdominal radical hysterectomy between 2010 and 2019. Patients were categorized into two groups based on whether they received a blood transfusion. The analysis encompassed various demographic factors, including race, sex, and age, as well as length of stay (LOS), total hospitalization charges, hospital characteristics (admission type, insurance type, bed size, teaching status, geographic location, and hospital region), hospital mortality rates, comorbidities, and perioperative complications. Subsequently, both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were employed to ascertain factors associated with abdominal radical hysterectomy patients requiring blood transfusions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Blood transfusions occurred in 14.84% of patients between 2010 and 2019, with a downward trend over time. Receiving a transfusion was associated with several negative outcomes, including a longer length of stay, higher total charges, and complications like thrombocytopenia, acute myocardial infarction, pneumonia, and so on. Additionally, patients who received transfusions were more likely to experience postoperative delirium, deep vein thrombosis, and wound infection. Independent risk factors for blood transfusion include Black race, Asian or Pacific Islander race, non-elective surgery, hospitalization in a rural setting, pre-existing medical conditions like coagulopathy, chronic blood loss anemia, deficiency anemia and others. Conversely, patients with private insurance, residing in the West, or Midwest/North Central regions were less likely to require a blood transfusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study highlights the concern of perioperative blood transfusion in radical hysterectomy, linked to significant complications. Reducing intraoperative blood loss and optimizing care based on patient factors are crucial for improving outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"24 1","pages":"1454"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-13216-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With the rising prevalence of abdominal radical hysterectomy, the need for perioperative blood transfusion has emerged as a significant clinical challenge. Independent risk factors for blood transfusion during abdominal radical hysterectomy remains limited, and identifying these factors is needed.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of data was performed using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), focusing on patients who underwent abdominal radical hysterectomy between 2010 and 2019. Patients were categorized into two groups based on whether they received a blood transfusion. The analysis encompassed various demographic factors, including race, sex, and age, as well as length of stay (LOS), total hospitalization charges, hospital characteristics (admission type, insurance type, bed size, teaching status, geographic location, and hospital region), hospital mortality rates, comorbidities, and perioperative complications. Subsequently, both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were employed to ascertain factors associated with abdominal radical hysterectomy patients requiring blood transfusions.

Results: Blood transfusions occurred in 14.84% of patients between 2010 and 2019, with a downward trend over time. Receiving a transfusion was associated with several negative outcomes, including a longer length of stay, higher total charges, and complications like thrombocytopenia, acute myocardial infarction, pneumonia, and so on. Additionally, patients who received transfusions were more likely to experience postoperative delirium, deep vein thrombosis, and wound infection. Independent risk factors for blood transfusion include Black race, Asian or Pacific Islander race, non-elective surgery, hospitalization in a rural setting, pre-existing medical conditions like coagulopathy, chronic blood loss anemia, deficiency anemia and others. Conversely, patients with private insurance, residing in the West, or Midwest/North Central regions were less likely to require a blood transfusion.

Conclusion: Our study highlights the concern of perioperative blood transfusion in radical hysterectomy, linked to significant complications. Reducing intraoperative blood loss and optimizing care based on patient factors are crucial for improving outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宫颈癌腹部根治性子宫切除术后输血的发生率和风险因素:对美国全国住院病人样本进行的一项为期 10 年的回顾性研究。
背景:随着腹部根治性子宫切除术发病率的上升,围手术期输血需求已成为一项重大的临床挑战。腹部根治性子宫切除术中输血的独立风险因素仍然有限,需要确定这些因素:方法:利用全国住院患者样本(NIS)对数据进行了回顾性分析,重点关注 2010 年至 2019 年期间接受腹部根治性子宫切除术的患者。根据是否接受输血,患者被分为两组。分析涵盖了各种人口统计学因素,包括种族、性别和年龄,以及住院时间(LOS)、住院总费用、医院特征(入院类型、保险类型、床位规模、教学状态、地理位置和医院所在区域)、住院死亡率、合并症和围手术期并发症。随后,采用单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析来确定腹部根治性子宫切除术患者需要输血的相关因素:2010年至2019年期间,14.84%的患者进行了输血,且随着时间的推移呈下降趋势。接受输血与多种不良后果相关,包括住院时间延长、总费用增加以及血小板减少、急性心肌梗死、肺炎等并发症。此外,接受输血的患者更有可能出现术后谵妄、深静脉血栓和伤口感染。输血的独立风险因素包括黑人种族、亚洲或太平洋岛民种族、非选择性手术、在农村环境中住院、原有疾病如凝血功能障碍、慢性失血性贫血、缺血性贫血等。相反,有私人保险、居住在西部或中西部/中北部地区的患者需要输血的可能性较低:我们的研究强调了根治性子宫切除术围手术期输血的问题,这与严重的并发症有关。减少术中失血和根据患者因素优化护理对改善预后至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
期刊最新文献
Combined effects of nutrition, inflammatory status, and sleep quality on mortality in cancer survivors. METTL2B m3C RNA transferase: oncogenic role in ovarian cancer progression via regulation of the mTOR/AKT pathway and its link to the tumor immune microenvironment. Optimal timing of chemoradiation after resection or biopsy of glioblastomas: a nationwide population-based study. Association between the dietary inflammatory index and risk of lung cancer: a multi-centered case-control study. Attitudes towards risk-stratified breast cancer screening in Denmark - a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1