A Phase II, Open-Label Study of Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Followed by Donor Lymphocyte Infusions in Relapsed Multiple Myeloma Following Upfront Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Current oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI:10.3390/curroncol31110535
Richard LeBlanc, Stéphanie Thiant, Rafik Terra, Imran Ahmad, Jean-Sébastien Claveau, Nadia Bambace, Léa Bernard, Sandra Cohen, Jean-Sébastien Delisle, Silvy Lachance, Thomas Kiss, Denis-Claude Roy, Guy Sauvageau, Jean Roy
{"title":"A Phase II, Open-Label Study of Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Followed by Donor Lymphocyte Infusions in Relapsed Multiple Myeloma Following Upfront Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant.","authors":"Richard LeBlanc, Stéphanie Thiant, Rafik Terra, Imran Ahmad, Jean-Sébastien Claveau, Nadia Bambace, Léa Bernard, Sandra Cohen, Jean-Sébastien Delisle, Silvy Lachance, Thomas Kiss, Denis-Claude Roy, Guy Sauvageau, Jean Roy","doi":"10.3390/curroncol31110535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To date, the only potential curative treatment for multiple myeloma (MM) remains allogeneic (allo) hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), although, most patients will eventually relapse. In relapsed patients, donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs) have been reported to control disease, but the optimal strategy prior to and doses of DLIs remain unclear. With this study (NCT03413800), we aimed to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of lenalidomide and dexamethasome (Len/Dex) followed by escalating pre-determined doses of DLIs in MM patients who relapsed after allo HCT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients aged 18-65 years with relapsed MM following upfront tandem autologous (auto)/allo HCT were eligible. Treatment consisted of six cycles of Len/Dex followed by three standardized doses of DLIs: 5 × 10<sup>6</sup> CD3+/kg, 1 × 10<sup>7</sup>/kg and 5 × 10<sup>7</sup>/kg every 6 weeks. Bone marrow minimal measurable disease (MRD) using flow cytometry (10<sup>-5</sup>) was performed at enrolment, then every 3 months for 2 years or until disease progression, in a subset of patients. The primary endpoint was efficacy as measured by progression-free survival (PFS) at 2 years following Len/Dex/DLIs. Secondary objectives were safety including GVHD, response including MRD status and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 22 patients participated in this study, including 62% with high-risk cytogenetics. With a median follow-up of 5.3 years (range: 4.1-6.1), PFS and OS were 26.5% (95% CI: 10.4-45.9%) and 69.2% (95% CI: 43.3-85.1%), respectively. Overall, the best responses achieved post-Len/Dex + DLIs were complete remission in 9.1%, very good partial response in 50%, and progressive disease in 40.9%. Among the nine patients tested for MRD, only two achieved a negative status after receiving DLIs. Six patients died, all due to disease progression. No acute GVHD was observed after DLIs. We report a very low incidence of moderate/severe chronic GVHD of 18.2% with no need for systemic immunosuppressants one year after diagnosis. No unexpected adverse events were observed. Interestingly, a positive correlation between response to Len/Dex re-induction and response to DLIs was found (<i>p</i> = 0.0032).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that Len/Dex/DLIs in second line treatment after upfront tandem auto/allo HCT in relapsed MM patients remains feasible and safe. With a potential correlation between induction chemotherapy and DLI responses, more potent induction regimens together with higher doses of DLIs should be considered in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"31 11","pages":"7258-7274"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11592425/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31110535","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To date, the only potential curative treatment for multiple myeloma (MM) remains allogeneic (allo) hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), although, most patients will eventually relapse. In relapsed patients, donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs) have been reported to control disease, but the optimal strategy prior to and doses of DLIs remain unclear. With this study (NCT03413800), we aimed to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of lenalidomide and dexamethasome (Len/Dex) followed by escalating pre-determined doses of DLIs in MM patients who relapsed after allo HCT.

Methods: Patients aged 18-65 years with relapsed MM following upfront tandem autologous (auto)/allo HCT were eligible. Treatment consisted of six cycles of Len/Dex followed by three standardized doses of DLIs: 5 × 106 CD3+/kg, 1 × 107/kg and 5 × 107/kg every 6 weeks. Bone marrow minimal measurable disease (MRD) using flow cytometry (10-5) was performed at enrolment, then every 3 months for 2 years or until disease progression, in a subset of patients. The primary endpoint was efficacy as measured by progression-free survival (PFS) at 2 years following Len/Dex/DLIs. Secondary objectives were safety including GVHD, response including MRD status and overall survival (OS).

Results: A total of 22 patients participated in this study, including 62% with high-risk cytogenetics. With a median follow-up of 5.3 years (range: 4.1-6.1), PFS and OS were 26.5% (95% CI: 10.4-45.9%) and 69.2% (95% CI: 43.3-85.1%), respectively. Overall, the best responses achieved post-Len/Dex + DLIs were complete remission in 9.1%, very good partial response in 50%, and progressive disease in 40.9%. Among the nine patients tested for MRD, only two achieved a negative status after receiving DLIs. Six patients died, all due to disease progression. No acute GVHD was observed after DLIs. We report a very low incidence of moderate/severe chronic GVHD of 18.2% with no need for systemic immunosuppressants one year after diagnosis. No unexpected adverse events were observed. Interestingly, a positive correlation between response to Len/Dex re-induction and response to DLIs was found (p = 0.0032).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that Len/Dex/DLIs in second line treatment after upfront tandem auto/allo HCT in relapsed MM patients remains feasible and safe. With a potential correlation between induction chemotherapy and DLI responses, more potent induction regimens together with higher doses of DLIs should be considered in the future.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
先期异基因干细胞移植后复发多发性骨髓瘤患者输注来那度胺和地塞米松后再输注供体淋巴细胞的开放标签 II 期研究。
背景:迄今为止,治疗多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的唯一可能治愈方法仍然是异基因(allo)造血细胞移植(HCT),尽管大多数患者最终会复发。据报道,对于复发患者,供体淋巴细胞输注(DLIs)可控制病情,但DLIs前的最佳策略和剂量仍不清楚。通过这项研究(NCT03413800),我们旨在调查来那度胺和地塞米松(Len/Dex)的疗效和毒性,然后在异体HCT后复发的MM患者中递增预定剂量的DLIs:年龄在18-65岁之间、先期串联自体(auto)/异体 HCT 后复发的 MM 患者均符合条件。治疗包括6个周期的Len/Dex,然后是3个标准剂量的DLIs:5 × 106 CD3+/kg、1 × 107/kg和5 × 107/kg,每6周一次。在入组时使用流式细胞术(10-5)检测骨髓最小可测量疾病(MRD),然后在2年内每3个月检测一次,直至部分患者病情恶化。主要终点是疗效,以Len/Dex/DLI后2年的无进展生存期(PFS)来衡量。次要目标是安全性(包括 GVHD)、反应(包括 MRD 状态)和总生存期(OS):共有22名患者参与了这项研究,其中62%为高危细胞遗传学患者。中位随访时间为5.3年(范围:4.1-6.1),PFS和OS分别为26.5%(95% CI:10.4-45.9%)和69.2%(95% CI:43.3-85.1%)。总体而言,Len/Dex+DLIs后取得的最佳反应是9.1%的患者完全缓解,50%的患者部分反应非常好,40.9%的患者病情进展。在接受MRD检测的9名患者中,只有2名患者在接受DLI后检测结果为阴性。六名患者死亡,均因疾病进展所致。接受 DLIs 后未发现急性 GVHD。我们的报告显示,中度/重度慢性坏死性疾病的发生率非常低,仅为18.2%,确诊一年后无需使用全身免疫抑制剂。没有观察到意外的不良事件。有趣的是,Len/Dex再诱导反应与DLIs反应之间呈正相关(p = 0.0032):我们的研究结果表明,Len/Dex/DLIs 在复发 MM 患者前期串联自体/异体 HCT 后的二线治疗中仍然可行且安全。由于诱导化疗与DLI反应之间可能存在相关性,未来应考虑采用更强的诱导方案和更大剂量的DLIs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
期刊最新文献
Metabolic Complete Response of Metastatic Oncogene-Negative, PDL1-Negative Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer After Chemo-Immunotherapy and Radiotherapy: A Case Report. Rural Versus Urban Genitourinary Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Pennsylvania: 1990-2019. Let It Grow: The Role of Growth Factors in Managing Chemotherapy-Induced Cytopenia. A Longitudinal Multimodal Imaging Study in Patients with Temporo-Insular Diffuse Low-Grade Tumors: How the Inferior Fronto-Occipital Fasciculus Provides Information on Cognitive Outcomes. Targeting TOP2A in Ovarian Cancer: Biological and Clinical Implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1