Enhancing Lung Ultrasound Diagnostics: A Clinical Study on an Artificial Intelligence Tool for the Detection and Quantification of A-Lines and B-Lines.
Mahdiar Nekoui, Seyed Ehsan Seyed Bolouri, Amir Forouzandeh, Masood Dehghan, Dornoosh Zonoobi, Jacob L Jaremko, Brian Buchanan, Arun Nagdev, Jeevesh Kapur
{"title":"Enhancing Lung Ultrasound Diagnostics: A Clinical Study on an Artificial Intelligence Tool for the Detection and Quantification of A-Lines and B-Lines.","authors":"Mahdiar Nekoui, Seyed Ehsan Seyed Bolouri, Amir Forouzandeh, Masood Dehghan, Dornoosh Zonoobi, Jacob L Jaremko, Brian Buchanan, Arun Nagdev, Jeevesh Kapur","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics14222526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objective:</b> A-lines and B-lines are key ultrasound markers that differentiate normal from abnormal lung conditions. A-lines are horizontal lines usually seen in normal aerated lungs, while B-lines are linear vertical artifacts associated with lung abnormalities such as pulmonary edema, infection, and COVID-19, where a higher number of B-lines indicates more severe pathology. This paper aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a newly released lung ultrasound AI tool (ExoLungAI) in the detection of A-lines and quantification/detection of B-lines to help clinicians in assessing pulmonary conditions. <b>Methods</b>: The algorithm is evaluated on 692 lung ultrasound scans collected from 48 patients (65% males, aged: 55 ± 12.9) following their admission to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for COVID-19 symptoms, including respiratory failure, pneumonia, and other complications. <b>Results</b>: ExoLungAI achieved a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 81% for A-line detection. For B-line detection, it attained a sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 86%. In quantifying B-lines, the algorithm achieved a weighted kappa score of 0.77 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.80) and an ICC of 0.87 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.89), showing substantial agreement between the ground truth and predicted B-line counts. <b>Conclusions</b>: ExoLungAI demonstrates a reliable performance in A-line detection and B-line detection/quantification. This automated tool has greater objectivity, consistency, and efficiency compared to manual methods. Many healthcare professionals including intensivists, radiologists, sonographers, medical trainers, and nurse practitioners can benefit from such a tool, as it assists the diagnostic capabilities of lung ultrasound and delivers rapid responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"14 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11593069/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14222526","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/Objective: A-lines and B-lines are key ultrasound markers that differentiate normal from abnormal lung conditions. A-lines are horizontal lines usually seen in normal aerated lungs, while B-lines are linear vertical artifacts associated with lung abnormalities such as pulmonary edema, infection, and COVID-19, where a higher number of B-lines indicates more severe pathology. This paper aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a newly released lung ultrasound AI tool (ExoLungAI) in the detection of A-lines and quantification/detection of B-lines to help clinicians in assessing pulmonary conditions. Methods: The algorithm is evaluated on 692 lung ultrasound scans collected from 48 patients (65% males, aged: 55 ± 12.9) following their admission to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for COVID-19 symptoms, including respiratory failure, pneumonia, and other complications. Results: ExoLungAI achieved a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 81% for A-line detection. For B-line detection, it attained a sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 86%. In quantifying B-lines, the algorithm achieved a weighted kappa score of 0.77 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.80) and an ICC of 0.87 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.89), showing substantial agreement between the ground truth and predicted B-line counts. Conclusions: ExoLungAI demonstrates a reliable performance in A-line detection and B-line detection/quantification. This automated tool has greater objectivity, consistency, and efficiency compared to manual methods. Many healthcare professionals including intensivists, radiologists, sonographers, medical trainers, and nurse practitioners can benefit from such a tool, as it assists the diagnostic capabilities of lung ultrasound and delivers rapid responses.
背景/目的:A 线和 B 线是区分正常和异常肺部情况的关键超声标记。A 线是水平线,通常见于正常通气的肺部,而 B 线是线性垂直伪影,与肺部异常(如肺水肿、感染和 COVID-19)有关,B 线数量越多表明病变越严重。本文旨在评估新发布的肺部超声人工智能工具(ExoLungAI)在检测 A 线和量化/检测 B 线方面的效果,以帮助临床医生评估肺部状况。方法:对因 COVID-19 症状(包括呼吸衰竭、肺炎和其他并发症)入住重症监护病房(ICU)的 48 名患者(65% 为男性,年龄:55 ± 12.9)的 692 次肺部超声扫描进行评估。结果ExoLungAI 的 A 线检测灵敏度为 91%,特异性为 81%。在 B 线检测中,灵敏度为 84%,特异性为 86%。在量化 B 线时,该算法的加权卡帕得分为 0.77(95% CI 0.74 至 0.80),ICC 为 0.87(95% CI 0.85 至 0.89),显示地面实况和预测的 B 线计数之间非常一致。结论ExoLungAI 在 A 线检测和 B 线检测/定量方面表现可靠。与人工方法相比,这种自动化工具具有更高的客观性、一致性和效率。包括重症监护医生、放射科医生、超声技师、医学培训师和执业护士在内的许多医疗保健专业人员都能从这种工具中受益,因为它能帮助提高肺部超声的诊断能力并提供快速反应。
DiagnosticsBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍:
Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.