A discrete choice experiment: Understanding patient preferences for managing chronic non-cancer pain.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY European Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1002/ejp.4760
Gabrielle Campbell, Stella Settumba, Ria Hopkins, Suzanne Nielsen, Briony Larance, Raimondo Bruno, Milton Cohen, Louisa Degenhardt, Marian Shanahan
{"title":"A discrete choice experiment: Understanding patient preferences for managing chronic non-cancer pain.","authors":"Gabrielle Campbell, Stella Settumba, Ria Hopkins, Suzanne Nielsen, Briony Larance, Raimondo Bruno, Milton Cohen, Louisa Degenhardt, Marian Shanahan","doi":"10.1002/ejp.4760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) is complex. Concerns about adverse effects associated with opioid pain medications and a lack of funding for holistic programs present challenges for decision-making among clinicians and patients. Discrete choice experiments (DCE) are one way of assessing and valuing patient treatment preferences.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>DCE attributes and levels were generated through qualitative research and included number of medicines, side effects from medicines, pain interference, care management, risk of addiction, activity goals, preferred source of information on pain management and willingness to pay. The survey was administered to participants with CNCP recruited through an existing cohort study (n = 442) and a sample of people living with CNCP recruited through Australia's leading pain advocacy body (Painaustralia) (n = 256).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of participants was 58 years (SD 12.0), the majority were female. The analysis revealed two latent demographic classes: a younger group with higher levels of private health insurance and an older group with lower levels of private health insurance coverage. There were notable differences in preference. The younger cohort exhibited a greater willingness-to-pay to reduce pain interference, whereas the older group prioritized GP management, preferred more medicines and expressed fewer addiction concerns.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients' treatment preferences diverged based on age and insurance status, underscoring the importance of understanding patient perspectives in treatment communication and care coordination. These findings provide insight into patient decision-making, which is important for promoting access to quality healthcare and engagement with evidence-based treatment of CNCP.</p><p><strong>Significance statement: </strong>A discrete choice experiment identified two groups: younger, with more private insurance, and older, with less private health insurance, each with unique pain management preferences. Clinicians should be aware that age and private health insurance may have an impact on a patient's preferences for CNCP management.</p>","PeriodicalId":12021,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.4760","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The management of chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) is complex. Concerns about adverse effects associated with opioid pain medications and a lack of funding for holistic programs present challenges for decision-making among clinicians and patients. Discrete choice experiments (DCE) are one way of assessing and valuing patient treatment preferences.

Method: DCE attributes and levels were generated through qualitative research and included number of medicines, side effects from medicines, pain interference, care management, risk of addiction, activity goals, preferred source of information on pain management and willingness to pay. The survey was administered to participants with CNCP recruited through an existing cohort study (n = 442) and a sample of people living with CNCP recruited through Australia's leading pain advocacy body (Painaustralia) (n = 256).

Results: The median age of participants was 58 years (SD 12.0), the majority were female. The analysis revealed two latent demographic classes: a younger group with higher levels of private health insurance and an older group with lower levels of private health insurance coverage. There were notable differences in preference. The younger cohort exhibited a greater willingness-to-pay to reduce pain interference, whereas the older group prioritized GP management, preferred more medicines and expressed fewer addiction concerns.

Conclusion: Patients' treatment preferences diverged based on age and insurance status, underscoring the importance of understanding patient perspectives in treatment communication and care coordination. These findings provide insight into patient decision-making, which is important for promoting access to quality healthcare and engagement with evidence-based treatment of CNCP.

Significance statement: A discrete choice experiment identified two groups: younger, with more private insurance, and older, with less private health insurance, each with unique pain management preferences. Clinicians should be aware that age and private health insurance may have an impact on a patient's preferences for CNCP management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
离散选择实验:了解患者对控制慢性非癌性疼痛的偏好。
背景:慢性非癌性疼痛(CNCP)的治疗非常复杂。人们对阿片类止痛药相关不良反应的担忧以及整体项目资金的匮乏给临床医生和患者的决策带来了挑战。离散选择实验(DCE)是评估和评价患者治疗偏好的一种方法:离散选择实验的属性和水平是通过定性研究得出的,包括药物数量、药物副作用、疼痛干扰、护理管理、成瘾风险、活动目标、首选的疼痛管理信息来源以及支付意愿。调查对象包括通过现有队列研究招募的 CNCP 患者(442 人)和通过澳大利亚主要疼痛倡导机构(Painaustralia)招募的 CNCP 患者样本(256 人):结果:参与者的中位年龄为 58 岁(SD 12.0),大多数为女性。分析结果显示了两个潜在的人口统计类别:一个是私人医疗保险水平较高的年轻群体,另一个是私人医疗保险水平较低的老年群体。在偏好方面存在明显差异。年轻群体更愿意为减少疼痛干扰而付费,而年长群体则优先考虑全科医生的管理,偏好更多的药物,对药物成瘾的担忧也更少:患者的治疗偏好因年龄和保险状况而异,这凸显了在治疗沟通和护理协调中了解患者观点的重要性。这些研究结果提供了对患者决策的深入了解,这对促进患者获得高质量的医疗服务和参与 CNCP 循证治疗非常重要:一项离散选择实验确定了两组患者:拥有更多私人保险的年轻患者和拥有较少私人医疗保险的老年患者,每组患者都有独特的疼痛治疗偏好。临床医生应该意识到,年龄和私人医疗保险可能会影响患者对 CNCP 治疗的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Pain
European Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Pain (EJP) publishes clinical and basic science research papers relevant to all aspects of pain and its management, including specialties such as anaesthesia, dentistry, neurology and neurosurgery, orthopaedics, palliative care, pharmacology, physiology, psychiatry, psychology and rehabilitation; socio-economic aspects of pain are also covered. Regular sections in the journal are as follows: • Editorials and Commentaries • Position Papers and Guidelines • Reviews • Original Articles • Letters • Bookshelf The journal particularly welcomes clinical trials, which are published on an occasional basis. Research articles are published under the following subject headings: • Neurobiology • Neurology • Experimental Pharmacology • Clinical Pharmacology • Psychology • Behavioural Therapy • Epidemiology • Cancer Pain • Acute Pain • Clinical Trials.
期刊最新文献
A discrete choice experiment: Understanding patient preferences for managing chronic non-cancer pain. Beyond intensity: A commentary on stretch-induced hypoalgesia. Evaluating multiplicity reporting in analgesic clinical trials: An analytical review. Cycling sensitivity across migraine phases: A longitudinal case-control study. Preoperative resting-state electrophysiological signals predict acute but not chronic postoperative pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1