Patient-Level Pericoronary Adipose Tissue Mean Attenuation: Associations with Plaque Characteristics.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.3390/jcdd11110360
Katrine Schultz Overgaard, Thomas Rueskov Andersen, Roda Abdulkadir Mohamed, Sebastian Villesen Kristensen, Helle Precht, Jess Lambrechtsen, Søren Auscher, Kenneth Egstrup
{"title":"Patient-Level Pericoronary Adipose Tissue Mean Attenuation: Associations with Plaque Characteristics.","authors":"Katrine Schultz Overgaard, Thomas Rueskov Andersen, Roda Abdulkadir Mohamed, Sebastian Villesen Kristensen, Helle Precht, Jess Lambrechtsen, Søren Auscher, Kenneth Egstrup","doi":"10.3390/jcdd11110360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation (PCAT<sub>a</sub>), observed from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), is emerging as an inflammation marker. This study evaluated the relationship between PCAT<sub>a</sub> and plaque characteristics, including plaque type, burden, and coronary calcification. An observational study was conducted on 466 patients with suspected chronic coronary syndrome who underwent clinically indicated CCTA. PCAT<sub>a</sub> was measured along the proximal 40 mm of the coronary arteries and averaged to represent the patient's level. Plaque type was assessed, compositional plaque volumes were measured, and plaque burdens were quantified. The coronary calcification scores (CCSs) were categorized into groups. Statistical methods included <i>t</i>-tests, ANOVA, and multivariate regression analysis. PCAT<sub>a</sub> differed significantly between calcified (-81.7 Hounsfield units (HU)) and soft (-77.5 HU) plaques. PCAT<sub>a</sub> was positively associated with total plaque burden (β = 3.6) and non-calcified plaque burden (β = 7.0), but negatively correlated with calcified plaque burden (β = -3.5), independent of clinical factors and tube voltage (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The effect of PCAT<sub>a</sub> was stronger when plaques of a different composition were absent. No significant differences in PCAT<sub>a</sub> were found among different CCS groups. PCAT<sub>a</sub> increased for calcified compared to soft plaques. The non-calcified plaque burden was associated with a higher PCAT<sub>a</sub>, while the calcified plaque burden was associated with a lower PCAT<sub>a</sub>.</p>","PeriodicalId":15197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","volume":"11 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11594772/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11110360","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation (PCATa), observed from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), is emerging as an inflammation marker. This study evaluated the relationship between PCATa and plaque characteristics, including plaque type, burden, and coronary calcification. An observational study was conducted on 466 patients with suspected chronic coronary syndrome who underwent clinically indicated CCTA. PCATa was measured along the proximal 40 mm of the coronary arteries and averaged to represent the patient's level. Plaque type was assessed, compositional plaque volumes were measured, and plaque burdens were quantified. The coronary calcification scores (CCSs) were categorized into groups. Statistical methods included t-tests, ANOVA, and multivariate regression analysis. PCATa differed significantly between calcified (-81.7 Hounsfield units (HU)) and soft (-77.5 HU) plaques. PCATa was positively associated with total plaque burden (β = 3.6) and non-calcified plaque burden (β = 7.0), but negatively correlated with calcified plaque burden (β = -3.5), independent of clinical factors and tube voltage (p < 0.05). The effect of PCATa was stronger when plaques of a different composition were absent. No significant differences in PCATa were found among different CCS groups. PCATa increased for calcified compared to soft plaques. The non-calcified plaque burden was associated with a higher PCATa, while the calcified plaque burden was associated with a lower PCATa.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者水平冠状动脉周围脂肪组织平均衰减:与斑块特征的关联
通过冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CCTA)观察到的冠状动脉周围脂肪组织衰减(PCATa)正在成为一种炎症标记物。本研究评估了 PCATa 与斑块特征(包括斑块类型、负荷和冠状动脉钙化)之间的关系。该研究对 466 名疑似慢性冠状动脉综合征患者进行了观察,这些患者均接受了有临床指征的 CCTA 检查。PCATa 沿冠状动脉近端 40 毫米处测量,取平均值代表患者的水平。评估斑块类型,测量斑块体积成分,量化斑块负担。冠状动脉钙化评分(CCS)被分为不同的组别。统计方法包括 t 检验、方差分析和多变量回归分析。钙化斑块(-81.7 HU)和软斑块(-77.5 HU)的 PCATa 差异很大。PCATa 与斑块总负荷(β = 3.6)和非钙化斑块负荷(β = 7.0)呈正相关,但与钙化斑块负荷(β = -3.5)呈负相关,与临床因素和导管电压无关(p < 0.05)。当没有不同成分的斑块时,PCATa 的影响更强。不同 CCS 组间的 PCATa 没有明显差异。与软斑块相比,钙化斑块的 PCATa 增加。非钙化斑块负荷与较高的 PCATa 相关,而钙化斑块负荷与较低的 PCATa 相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
381
期刊最新文献
Cardiac Rehabilitation After Open Heart Surgery: A Narrative Systematic Review. Different Proteins as Biomarkers for Sac Shrinkage After Endovascular Aortic Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. Predictive Value of Preoperative Morphology Parameters in Patients Undergoing On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. Sex Differences Among Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Repair Using the Edge-to-Edge Technique. Females at a Clear Disadvantage with Postoperative Myocardial Infarction Symptoms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1