Achieving Better Clinical Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Knees with Valgus Deformity: The Role of Alignment Strategies.

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.24.00207
Cécile Batailler, Timothy Lording, Thibaut Libert, Elvire Servien, Sébastien Lustig
{"title":"Achieving Better Clinical Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Knees with Valgus Deformity: The Role of Alignment Strategies.","authors":"Cécile Batailler, Timothy Lording, Thibaut Libert, Elvire Servien, Sébastien Lustig","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Personalized alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has demonstrated good functional outcomes for knees with varus alignment. However, limited research has explicitly addressed optimal alignment strategies for valgus knees. The aims of the current study were to assess the impact of the postoperative knee alignment and of the degree of correction of knee alignment on functional outcomes and satisfaction in a population with preoperative valgus and to evaluate the complication and revision rates based on postoperative alignment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included primary posterior-stabilized TKA with a preoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle of ≥180°, with a minimum follow-up of 32 months. There were 460 knees included, divided into 3 groups: (1) preoperative neutral alignment (180° to 183°) (n = 162), (2) preoperative mild valgus (184° to 190°) (n = 204), and (3) preoperative severe valgus (>190°) (n = 94). A standardized surgical technique was employed with a goal of achieving neutral postoperative alignment. Data on radiographs, Knee Society Scores (KSS), range of motion, satisfaction, complications, and revisions were collected at the last follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean follow-up was 74.3 ± 12.4 months. In the preoperative mild valgus group, 10.8% of patients had postoperative varus, 81.4% had postoperative neutral alignment, and 7.8% had postoperative valgus. In the preoperative severe valgus group, 4.3% had postoperative varus, 83.0% had postoperative neutral alignment, and 12.8% had postoperative valgus. In the preoperative mild valgus group, patients with postoperative neutral alignment had significantly higher satisfaction (p = 0.0004) and KSS function score (p = 0.031) than patients with postoperative valgus alignment. In the preoperative severe valgus group, patients with postoperative valgus alignment had significantly higher satisfaction (p = 0.035) and greater improvement of the KSS knee score (p = 0.014) than patients with postoperative neutral alignment. Functional outcomes were not impacted by the degree of HKA angle correction. There were significantly fewer complications (p = 0.022) and revisions (p = 0.007) in the preoperative mild valgus group when patients had a postoperative neutral alignment compared with a postoperative valgus alignment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For preoperative mild valgus, correction to neutral alignment achieved better outcomes and fewer complications than leaving residual valgus. For preoperative severe valgus, retaining residual valgus postoperatively ensured satisfactory functional outcomes without increased complications.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.00207","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Personalized alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has demonstrated good functional outcomes for knees with varus alignment. However, limited research has explicitly addressed optimal alignment strategies for valgus knees. The aims of the current study were to assess the impact of the postoperative knee alignment and of the degree of correction of knee alignment on functional outcomes and satisfaction in a population with preoperative valgus and to evaluate the complication and revision rates based on postoperative alignment.

Methods: This retrospective study included primary posterior-stabilized TKA with a preoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle of ≥180°, with a minimum follow-up of 32 months. There were 460 knees included, divided into 3 groups: (1) preoperative neutral alignment (180° to 183°) (n = 162), (2) preoperative mild valgus (184° to 190°) (n = 204), and (3) preoperative severe valgus (>190°) (n = 94). A standardized surgical technique was employed with a goal of achieving neutral postoperative alignment. Data on radiographs, Knee Society Scores (KSS), range of motion, satisfaction, complications, and revisions were collected at the last follow-up.

Results: The mean follow-up was 74.3 ± 12.4 months. In the preoperative mild valgus group, 10.8% of patients had postoperative varus, 81.4% had postoperative neutral alignment, and 7.8% had postoperative valgus. In the preoperative severe valgus group, 4.3% had postoperative varus, 83.0% had postoperative neutral alignment, and 12.8% had postoperative valgus. In the preoperative mild valgus group, patients with postoperative neutral alignment had significantly higher satisfaction (p = 0.0004) and KSS function score (p = 0.031) than patients with postoperative valgus alignment. In the preoperative severe valgus group, patients with postoperative valgus alignment had significantly higher satisfaction (p = 0.035) and greater improvement of the KSS knee score (p = 0.014) than patients with postoperative neutral alignment. Functional outcomes were not impacted by the degree of HKA angle correction. There were significantly fewer complications (p = 0.022) and revisions (p = 0.007) in the preoperative mild valgus group when patients had a postoperative neutral alignment compared with a postoperative valgus alignment.

Conclusions: For preoperative mild valgus, correction to neutral alignment achieved better outcomes and fewer complications than leaving residual valgus. For preoperative severe valgus, retaining residual valgus postoperatively ensured satisfactory functional outcomes without increased complications.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
膝关节外翻畸形者全膝关节置换术后获得更好的临床疗效:对位策略的作用。
背景:全膝关节置换术(TKA)中的个性化对位已证明对膝关节内翻对位具有良好的功能效果。然而,针对膝关节外翻的最佳对位策略的研究还很有限。本研究的目的是评估膝关节术后对位和膝关节对位矫正程度对术前膝外翻人群的功能预后和满意度的影响,并根据术后对位评估并发症和翻修率:这项回顾性研究包括术前髋-膝-踝(HKA)夹角≥180°、随访至少32个月的初次后固定TKA。共纳入460个膝关节,分为3组:(1) 术前中立对位(180°至183°)(n = 162),(2) 术前轻度外翻(184°至190°)(n = 204),(3) 术前严重外翻(>190°)(n = 94)。手术采用标准化手术技术,目标是实现术后中立对齐。在最后一次随访时收集了有关X光片、膝关节社会评分(KSS)、活动范围、满意度、并发症和翻修的数据:平均随访时间为 74.3 ± 12.4 个月。在术前轻度外翻组中,10.8%的患者术后出现膝关节屈曲,81.4%的患者术后呈中立位,7.8%的患者术后出现膝关节外翻。在术前重度外翻组中,4.3%的患者术后出现屈曲,83.0%的患者术后中立对齐,12.8%的患者术后出现外翻。在术前轻度外翻组中,术后中性对位的患者的满意度(p = 0.0004)和 KSS 功能评分(p = 0.031)明显高于术后外翻对位的患者。在术前严重外翻组中,术后外翻对位患者的满意度(p = 0.035)和 KSS 膝关节评分(p = 0.014)的改善程度均明显高于术后中性对位患者。功能结果不受 HKA 角度矫正程度的影响。术前轻度外翻组患者术后采用中性对位的并发症(p = 0.022)和翻修(p = 0.007)明显少于术后采用外翻对位的患者:结论:对于术前轻度外翻的患者,与保留残余外翻相比,矫正为中性对位能取得更好的疗效,并发症也更少。对于术前严重外翻的患者,术后保留残余外翻可确保满意的功能效果,同时不会增加并发症:证据等级:治疗三级。有关证据等级的完整描述,请参阅 "作者须知"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.50%
发文量
660
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (JBJS) has been the most valued source of information for orthopaedic surgeons and researchers for over 125 years and is the gold standard in peer-reviewed scientific information in the field. A core journal and essential reading for general as well as specialist orthopaedic surgeons worldwide, The Journal publishes evidence-based research to enhance the quality of care for orthopaedic patients. Standards of excellence and high quality are maintained in everything we do, from the science of the content published to the customer service we provide. JBJS is an independent, non-profit journal.
期刊最新文献
Achieving Better Clinical Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Knees with Valgus Deformity: The Role of Alignment Strategies. Blood and Bone-Derived DNA Methylation Ages Predict Mortality After Geriatric Hip Fracture: A Pilot Study. Development and Validation of Objective and Subjective Osteoporosis Knowledge Instruments Among Chinese Orthopaedic Surgeons. Radiographic Outcome Following Treatment of Residual Hip Dysplasia with Pemberton Versus Salter Osteotomy: Comparison of Results in Patients Followed to Skeletal Maturity. What's Important (Arts & Humanities): Temple of Healing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1