Fei Mao, Luyao Cai, Dan Pan, Mei Huang, Qing Wang, Qianming Chen, Ruixue Ai, Yu Zhou
{"title":"Burning Mouth Syndrome May Essentially Be Related To Psychoneuroimmunology: Mechanism Hypothesis.","authors":"Fei Mao, Luyao Cai, Dan Pan, Mei Huang, Qing Wang, Qianming Chen, Ruixue Ai, Yu Zhou","doi":"10.1111/joor.13893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is a chronic intraoral dysesthesia with elusive aetiology, only few studies have been carried out on immune function in BMS patients. We aimed to investigate the role immune function paly in the pathogenesis of BMS by psychoneuroimmunology (PNI).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We recruited 44 BMS patients and 31 controls. We measured the anxiety and depression levels by the Zung' Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Zung' Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS), respectively. Serological immunity included cellular immunity, humoral immunity and autoantibody. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to quantify pain levels. We used the Pearson correlation analysis to analyse the relationship between pain, psychology and immune function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BMS exhibited higher levels of anxiety and depression (***p < 0.001 for both). In BMS, the CD3<sup>+</sup> cells, CD4<sup>+</sup> cells were lower (*p = 0.028, 0.046 and 0.033, respectively), IgE and antinuclear antibody (ANA) was higher (*p = 0.035). The average VAS score among BMS was approximately 3.7. Pearson correlation analysis revealed positive correlations between VAS, SAS and SDS; negative correlations between these scores of VAS, SAS, SDS and the levels of CD3<sup>+</sup> cells, CD4<sup>+</sup> cells, CD8<sup>+</sup> cells.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BMS were more painful, anxious, depressive, and immunity dysfunction than controls. We proposed a mechanism hypothesis that the BMS may essentially be an immunological disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":16605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.13893","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is a chronic intraoral dysesthesia with elusive aetiology, only few studies have been carried out on immune function in BMS patients. We aimed to investigate the role immune function paly in the pathogenesis of BMS by psychoneuroimmunology (PNI).
Method: We recruited 44 BMS patients and 31 controls. We measured the anxiety and depression levels by the Zung' Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Zung' Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS), respectively. Serological immunity included cellular immunity, humoral immunity and autoantibody. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to quantify pain levels. We used the Pearson correlation analysis to analyse the relationship between pain, psychology and immune function.
Results: BMS exhibited higher levels of anxiety and depression (***p < 0.001 for both). In BMS, the CD3+ cells, CD4+ cells were lower (*p = 0.028, 0.046 and 0.033, respectively), IgE and antinuclear antibody (ANA) was higher (*p = 0.035). The average VAS score among BMS was approximately 3.7. Pearson correlation analysis revealed positive correlations between VAS, SAS and SDS; negative correlations between these scores of VAS, SAS, SDS and the levels of CD3+ cells, CD4+ cells, CD8+ cells.
Conclusions: BMS were more painful, anxious, depressive, and immunity dysfunction than controls. We proposed a mechanism hypothesis that the BMS may essentially be an immunological disease.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation aims to be the most prestigious journal of dental research within all aspects of oral rehabilitation and applied oral physiology. It covers all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to re-establish a subjective and objective harmonious oral function.
Oral rehabilitation may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, orofacial traumas, or a variety of dental and oral diseases (primarily dental caries and periodontal diseases) and orofacial pain conditions. As such, oral rehabilitation in the twenty-first century is a matter of skilful diagnosis and minimal, appropriate intervention, the nature of which is intimately linked to a profound knowledge of oral physiology, oral biology, and dental and oral pathology.
The scientific content of the journal therefore strives to reflect the best of evidence-based clinical dentistry. Modern clinical management should be based on solid scientific evidence gathered about diagnostic procedures and the properties and efficacy of the chosen intervention (e.g. material science, biological, toxicological, pharmacological or psychological aspects). The content of the journal also reflects documentation of the possible side-effects of rehabilitation, and includes prognostic perspectives of the treatment modalities chosen.