Performance of questionnaires to predict sleep-disordered breathing in acute stroke patients.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Sleep Research Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1111/jsr.14416
Martijn Petrus Josephus Dekkers, Christian Michael Horvath, Vanessa S Woerz, Corrado Bernasconi, Simone B Duss, Markus H Schmidt, Mauro Manconi, Anne-Kathrin Brill, Claudio L A Bassetti
{"title":"Performance of questionnaires to predict sleep-disordered breathing in acute stroke patients.","authors":"Martijn Petrus Josephus Dekkers, Christian Michael Horvath, Vanessa S Woerz, Corrado Bernasconi, Simone B Duss, Markus H Schmidt, Mauro Manconi, Anne-Kathrin Brill, Claudio L A Bassetti","doi":"10.1111/jsr.14416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sleep-disordered breathing is common in stroke and may negatively affect its outcome. Screening for sleep-disordered breathing in this setting is of interest but poorly studied. We aimed to evaluate the performance of eight obstructive sleep apnea screening questionnaires to predict sleep-disordered breathing in acute stroke or transient ischaemic attack patients, and to assess the impact of stroke/transient ischaemic attack-specific factors on sleep-disordered breathing prediction. We analysed acute stroke/transient ischaemic attack patients (N = 195) from a prospective cohort (\"Sleep Deficiency and Stroke Outcome study\"). Assessments included anthropometrics, stroke-specific parameters, sleep history, an in-hospital respiratory polygraphy within the first week after stroke, and obstructive sleep apnea screening questionnaires (Berlin Questionnaire, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, STOP-BANG, NoSAS, Sleep Apnea Clinical Score, No-Apnea, Sleep Obstructive apnea score optimized for Stroke, SLEEP-IN). In a binary classification task for respiratory event index ≥ 15 per hr, we evaluated the performance of the above-mentioned questionnaires. We used logistic regression to identify predictors for sleep-disordered breathing in this cohort. The areas under the curve for respiratory event index ≥ 15 per hr were: Berlin Questionnaire 0.60; STOP-BANG 0.72; NoSAS 0.69; No-Apnea 0.69; Sleep Apnea Clinical Score 0.75; Epworth Sleepiness Scale 0.50; Sleep Obstructive apnea score optimized for Stroke 0.58; and SLEEP-IN 0.67. The No-Apnea had the lowest false omission rate (0.13), a sensitivity of 0.97 and a specificity of 0.12. In multiple logistic regression analysis (respiratory event index ≥ 15 per hr), age, neck circumference, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at admission, prior stroke, cardioembolic stroke aetiology and observed apneas were associated with sleep-disordered breathing. The logistic regression model performed similar (area under the curve 0.80) to Sleep Apnea Clinical Score (p = 0.402) and STOP-BANG (p = 0.127), but outperformed the other questionnaires. Neither existing questionnaires nor our statistical model are sufficient to accurately diagnose sleep-disordered breathing after stroke, thus requiring sleep study evaluation. The No-Apnea questionnaire may help to identify patients amenable to sleep testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":17057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sleep Research","volume":" ","pages":"e14416"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sleep Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.14416","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sleep-disordered breathing is common in stroke and may negatively affect its outcome. Screening for sleep-disordered breathing in this setting is of interest but poorly studied. We aimed to evaluate the performance of eight obstructive sleep apnea screening questionnaires to predict sleep-disordered breathing in acute stroke or transient ischaemic attack patients, and to assess the impact of stroke/transient ischaemic attack-specific factors on sleep-disordered breathing prediction. We analysed acute stroke/transient ischaemic attack patients (N = 195) from a prospective cohort ("Sleep Deficiency and Stroke Outcome study"). Assessments included anthropometrics, stroke-specific parameters, sleep history, an in-hospital respiratory polygraphy within the first week after stroke, and obstructive sleep apnea screening questionnaires (Berlin Questionnaire, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, STOP-BANG, NoSAS, Sleep Apnea Clinical Score, No-Apnea, Sleep Obstructive apnea score optimized for Stroke, SLEEP-IN). In a binary classification task for respiratory event index ≥ 15 per hr, we evaluated the performance of the above-mentioned questionnaires. We used logistic regression to identify predictors for sleep-disordered breathing in this cohort. The areas under the curve for respiratory event index ≥ 15 per hr were: Berlin Questionnaire 0.60; STOP-BANG 0.72; NoSAS 0.69; No-Apnea 0.69; Sleep Apnea Clinical Score 0.75; Epworth Sleepiness Scale 0.50; Sleep Obstructive apnea score optimized for Stroke 0.58; and SLEEP-IN 0.67. The No-Apnea had the lowest false omission rate (0.13), a sensitivity of 0.97 and a specificity of 0.12. In multiple logistic regression analysis (respiratory event index ≥ 15 per hr), age, neck circumference, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at admission, prior stroke, cardioembolic stroke aetiology and observed apneas were associated with sleep-disordered breathing. The logistic regression model performed similar (area under the curve 0.80) to Sleep Apnea Clinical Score (p = 0.402) and STOP-BANG (p = 0.127), but outperformed the other questionnaires. Neither existing questionnaires nor our statistical model are sufficient to accurately diagnose sleep-disordered breathing after stroke, thus requiring sleep study evaluation. The No-Apnea questionnaire may help to identify patients amenable to sleep testing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测急性脑卒中患者睡眠呼吸障碍的问卷性能。
睡眠呼吸障碍在中风中很常见,可能会对中风的预后产生负面影响。在这种情况下筛查睡眠呼吸障碍很有意义,但研究很少。我们旨在评估八种阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停筛查问卷在预测急性中风或短暂性脑缺血发作患者睡眠呼吸障碍方面的性能,并评估中风/短暂性脑缺血发作特定因素对睡眠呼吸障碍预测的影响。我们分析了前瞻性队列("睡眠不足与中风结果研究")中的急性中风/短暂性脑缺血发作患者(N = 195)。评估内容包括人体测量、中风特异性参数、睡眠史、中风后一周内的院内呼吸测谎以及阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停筛查问卷(柏林问卷、埃普沃斯嗜睡量表、STOP-BANG、NoSAS、睡眠呼吸暂停临床评分、No-Apnea、针对中风优化的睡眠呼吸暂停评分、SLEEP-IN)。在呼吸事件指数≥ 15 次/小时的二元分类任务中,我们评估了上述问卷的性能。我们使用逻辑回归法来确定该队列中睡眠呼吸障碍的预测因素。呼吸事件指数≥15 次/小时的曲线下面积分别为柏林问卷 0.60;STOP-BANG 0.72;NoSAS 0.69;No-Apnea 0.69;睡眠呼吸暂停临床评分 0.75;Epworth 嗜睡量表 0.50;针对中风优化的睡眠呼吸暂停评分 0.58;SLEEP-IN 0.67。无呼吸暂停的错误遗漏率最低(0.13),灵敏度为 0.97,特异性为 0.12。在多重逻辑回归分析中(呼吸事件指数≥ 15 次/小时),年龄、颈围、入院时美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表、既往卒中、心肌栓塞性卒中病因和观察到的呼吸暂停与睡眠呼吸障碍有关。逻辑回归模型的表现与睡眠呼吸暂停临床评分(p = 0.402)和 STOP-BANG (p = 0.127)相似(曲线下面积为 0.80),但优于其他问卷。现有的问卷和我们的统计模型都不足以准确诊断中风后的睡眠呼吸障碍,因此需要进行睡眠研究评估。无呼吸暂停问卷可帮助识别适合进行睡眠测试的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sleep Research
Journal of Sleep Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
6.80%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sleep Research is dedicated to basic and clinical sleep research. The Journal publishes original research papers and invited reviews in all areas of sleep research (including biological rhythms). The Journal aims to promote the exchange of ideas between basic and clinical sleep researchers coming from a wide range of backgrounds and disciplines. The Journal will achieve this by publishing papers which use multidisciplinary and novel approaches to answer important questions about sleep, as well as its disorders and the treatment thereof.
期刊最新文献
Promoting vocabulary learning during sleep at home using closed-loop targeted memory reactivation. The endothelin-1 system among high-risk pregnant women with obstructive sleep apnea. Cognitive and psychological factors associated with treatment response in ACT-I and CBT-I for insomnia. Co-production in sleep research: A scoping review of current practices and future directions. The cathartic dream: Using a large language model to study a new type of functional dream in healthy and clinical populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1