Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the persian version of the functional assessment scale for acute hamstring injuries.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1186/s13018-024-05252-3
Mohammad Hadadi, Farzaneh Haghighat
{"title":"Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the persian version of the functional assessment scale for acute hamstring injuries.","authors":"Mohammad Hadadi, Farzaneh Haghighat","doi":"10.1186/s13018-024-05252-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Functional Assessment Scale for Acute Hamstring Injuries (FASH) which measure symptom's severity and impact on physical activity and sports ability in individuals with acute hamstring muscle injury, is not available in Persian. The aim of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the FASH questionnaire to Persian and to assess the psychometric properties of the translated version.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Persian-translation and cross-cultural adaptation processes were based on World Health Organization method. A total of 160 participants compromising of four groups: (1) acute hamstring injury (N = 40), (2) other lower extremity injury (N = 40), (3) risk of acute injury (N = 40), and (4) healthy control (N = 40) were recruited to complete the Persian version of FASH (FASH-P) questionnaire twice with an interval of 48-60 h. The Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) were used to assess the criterion validity. Test-retest reliability, internal consistency, criterion validity, Dimensionality and floor/ceiling effects were evaluated to assess the FASH-P psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FASH questionnaire were translated to Persian without any major problems. The FASH-P showed excellent power of differentiation because the scores were significantly different among the four groups. Regarding psychometric performances, excellent test-retest reliability (Intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.997) and a high level of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha of 0.966) were observed. The FASH-P total score was significantly correlated with SF-36 and LEFS questionnaires representing an excellent criterion validity. No floor or ceiling effect were found for total score in Hamstring muscle injury group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Due to the excellent psychometric performance, the FASH-P can be used as a reliable and valid tool for evaluating the severity of symptoms and sports ability in Persian-speaking patients with hamstring muscle injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"19 1","pages":"794"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11590248/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05252-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Functional Assessment Scale for Acute Hamstring Injuries (FASH) which measure symptom's severity and impact on physical activity and sports ability in individuals with acute hamstring muscle injury, is not available in Persian. The aim of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the FASH questionnaire to Persian and to assess the psychometric properties of the translated version.

Methods: The Persian-translation and cross-cultural adaptation processes were based on World Health Organization method. A total of 160 participants compromising of four groups: (1) acute hamstring injury (N = 40), (2) other lower extremity injury (N = 40), (3) risk of acute injury (N = 40), and (4) healthy control (N = 40) were recruited to complete the Persian version of FASH (FASH-P) questionnaire twice with an interval of 48-60 h. The Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) were used to assess the criterion validity. Test-retest reliability, internal consistency, criterion validity, Dimensionality and floor/ceiling effects were evaluated to assess the FASH-P psychometric properties.

Results: The FASH questionnaire were translated to Persian without any major problems. The FASH-P showed excellent power of differentiation because the scores were significantly different among the four groups. Regarding psychometric performances, excellent test-retest reliability (Intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.997) and a high level of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha of 0.966) were observed. The FASH-P total score was significantly correlated with SF-36 and LEFS questionnaires representing an excellent criterion validity. No floor or ceiling effect were found for total score in Hamstring muscle injury group.

Conclusions: Due to the excellent psychometric performance, the FASH-P can be used as a reliable and valid tool for evaluating the severity of symptoms and sports ability in Persian-speaking patients with hamstring muscle injury.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波斯语版急性腿筋损伤功能评估量表的跨文化适应性、可靠性和有效性。
背景:急性腘绳肌损伤功能评估量表(FASH)可测量急性腘绳肌损伤患者症状的严重程度以及对体力活动和运动能力的影响,但目前还没有波斯语版本。本研究旨在将 FASH 问卷翻译成波斯语并进行跨文化改编,同时评估翻译版本的心理测量特性:方法:波斯语翻译和跨文化改编过程以世界卫生组织的方法为基础。共招募了 160 名参与者,分为四组:(1) 急性腿筋损伤组(40 人);(2) 其他下肢损伤组(40 人);(3) 急性损伤风险组(40 人);(4) 健康对照组(40 人)。通过评估重测信度、内部一致性、标准效度、维度和地板/天花板效应来评估 FASH-P 的心理测量学特性:结果:FASH 问卷被翻译成波斯文后没有出现任何重大问题。FASH-P显示出很好的区分能力,因为四组之间的得分有显著差异。在心理测量学方面,FASH-P 的测试-重复测试可靠性(类内相关系数为 0.997)和内部一致性(克朗巴赫α为 0.966)都非常好。FASH-P 总分与 SF-36 和 LEFS 问卷有明显的相关性,具有很好的标准效度。腘绳肌损伤组的总分没有发现下限或上限效应:结论:FASH-P 具有良好的心理测量性能,可作为一种可靠有效的工具,用于评估波斯语腘绳肌损伤患者的症状严重程度和运动能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
期刊最新文献
Advancements in the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. Exploration and breakthrough in the mode of intervertebral disc cell death may lead to significant advances in treatments for intervertebral disc degeneration. WTAP mediates IL-1β-induced chondrocyte injury by enhancing CA12 mRNA stability depending on m6A modification. A systematic comparative analysis of gait characteristics in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a review study. Biofilm and the effect of sonication in a chronic Staphylococcus epidermidis orthopedic in vivo implant infection model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1