Retrospective Analysis of Grip and Index Finger Strength, Job-Specific Scenario, and Shooting Performance in Incumbent Law Enforcement Personnel and Cadets.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1519/JSC.0000000000005028
Robert G Lockie, Michael A Young, Sarah N Lanham, Robin M Orr, J Jay Dawes, Thomas R Nagel
{"title":"Retrospective Analysis of Grip and Index Finger Strength, Job-Specific Scenario, and Shooting Performance in Incumbent Law Enforcement Personnel and Cadets.","authors":"Robert G Lockie, Michael A Young, Sarah N Lanham, Robin M Orr, J Jay Dawes, Thomas R Nagel","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Lockie, RG, Young, MA, Lanham, SN, Orr, RM, Dawes, JJ, and Nagel, TR. Retrospective analysis of grip and index finger strength, job-specific scenario, and shooting performance in incumbent law enforcement personnel and cadets. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-This study investigated grip and index finger strength, and scenario performance, of incumbent deputy sheriffs/police officers. All personnel (incumbents; n = 15) and cadets (n = 44) completed a job-specific scenario (step-ups, jumping jacks, sprawls, strikes, drags, carries, simulated fight) for time. Dominant grip strength (DGS) and nondominant grip strength (NDGS) and dominant index finger strength (DIFS) nondominant index finger strength (NDIFS) were measured pre- and postscenario. Incumbents and cadets then completed a 6-steel plate shooting test. Steel time (time to hit all plates) and number of shots required were recorded. Between-group differences in scenario time, steel time, and shots fired were analyzed by a univariate analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) (p < 0.05; covariates: sex, age). Relationships between grip and index finger strength with scenario variables were derived with partial correlations controlling for sex and age (p < 0.05; incumbents and cadets analyzed separately). A repeated measures ANCOVA (p < 0.05; covariates: sex, age) investigated between-group differences in grip and index finger strength, and whether there were changes postscenario. Cadets completed the scenario faster than the incumbents (p = 0.045). The incumbent group had a nonsignificant 71% faster steel time and required 40% fewer shots, and experienced a decrease in DGS and NDGS (p ≤ 0.013) postscenario. Pre- and post-DGS and NDGS, pre-DIFS, and post-NDIFS significantly related to scenario time for the cadets (r = -0.311 to -0.503). Incumbents had fitness limitations that affected scenario time but demonstrated better shooting skills. Even with grip strength decreases postscenario, incumbents likely had sufficient strength to complete the shooting task. Cadets may be more reliant on general fitness when completing job-specific scenarios because they require further skill development.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005028","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Lockie, RG, Young, MA, Lanham, SN, Orr, RM, Dawes, JJ, and Nagel, TR. Retrospective analysis of grip and index finger strength, job-specific scenario, and shooting performance in incumbent law enforcement personnel and cadets. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-This study investigated grip and index finger strength, and scenario performance, of incumbent deputy sheriffs/police officers. All personnel (incumbents; n = 15) and cadets (n = 44) completed a job-specific scenario (step-ups, jumping jacks, sprawls, strikes, drags, carries, simulated fight) for time. Dominant grip strength (DGS) and nondominant grip strength (NDGS) and dominant index finger strength (DIFS) nondominant index finger strength (NDIFS) were measured pre- and postscenario. Incumbents and cadets then completed a 6-steel plate shooting test. Steel time (time to hit all plates) and number of shots required were recorded. Between-group differences in scenario time, steel time, and shots fired were analyzed by a univariate analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) (p < 0.05; covariates: sex, age). Relationships between grip and index finger strength with scenario variables were derived with partial correlations controlling for sex and age (p < 0.05; incumbents and cadets analyzed separately). A repeated measures ANCOVA (p < 0.05; covariates: sex, age) investigated between-group differences in grip and index finger strength, and whether there were changes postscenario. Cadets completed the scenario faster than the incumbents (p = 0.045). The incumbent group had a nonsignificant 71% faster steel time and required 40% fewer shots, and experienced a decrease in DGS and NDGS (p ≤ 0.013) postscenario. Pre- and post-DGS and NDGS, pre-DIFS, and post-NDIFS significantly related to scenario time for the cadets (r = -0.311 to -0.503). Incumbents had fitness limitations that affected scenario time but demonstrated better shooting skills. Even with grip strength decreases postscenario, incumbents likely had sufficient strength to complete the shooting task. Cadets may be more reliant on general fitness when completing job-specific scenarios because they require further skill development.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对在职执法人员和学员的握力和食指力量、特定工作场景和射击成绩的回顾性分析。
Abstract: Lockie, RG, Young, MA, Lanham, SN, Orr, RM, Dawes, JJ, and Nagel, TR.在职执法人员和学员的握力和食指力量、特定工作场景和射击成绩的回顾性分析。J Strength Cond Res XX(X):000-000,2024--本研究调查了现任副警长/警官的握力和食指力量以及情景表现。所有人员(在职人员;n = 15)和学员(n = 44)都完成了特定工作场景(跨步、跳高、匍匐前进、打击、拖拽、搬运、模拟格斗)的计时。在情景前和情景后测量优势握力(DGS)和非优势握力(NDGS)以及优势食指力量(DIFS)和非优势食指力量(NDIFS)。然后,在职者和学员完成 6 块钢板射击测试。记录钢板射击时间(击中所有钢板的时间)和所需射击次数。通过单变量协方差分析(ANCOVA)分析了组间在情景时间、钢板时间和射击次数上的差异(P < 0.05;协变量:性别、年龄)。握力和食指力量与场景变量之间的关系是通过控制性别和年龄的偏相关性得出的(p < 0.05;在职者和学员分别分析)。重复测量方差分析(p < 0.05;协变量:性别、年龄)研究了组间握力和食指力量的差异,以及情景模拟后是否有变化。学员完成情景模拟的速度比在职人员快(p = 0.045)。现任组的钢时间比现任组快 71%,所需的射击次数减少 40%,但无显著性差异;情景模拟后,DGS 和 NDGS 均有所下降(p ≤ 0.013)。DGS 和 NDGS 前、后、DIFS 前和-NDIFS 后与学员的场景时间有显著关系(r = -0.311 至 -0.503)。在职学员的体能限制影响了情景模拟时间,但他们的射击技能更出色。即使在情景模拟后握力下降,在职者也可能有足够的力量完成射击任务。学员在完成特定工作场景时可能更依赖于一般体能,因为这些场景需要进一步的技能发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.
期刊最新文献
Comparison Between Eccentric vs. Concentric Muscle Actions On Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Linear and Multidirectional Speed Testing (On-Field and Off-Field) Protocols in Senior and Elite Female Football. Understanding Training Load in Golf: A Survey of Swing Coaches, Performance Practitioners, and Medical Staff. Self-Regulated Learning Assessment in Young Soccer Players: Beyond Competitive Levels. Ventilatory and Perceived Ergogenic Effects of Mandibular Forward Repositioning During Running at Maximal Oxygen Uptake Intensity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1