Comparative Pharmacokinetics and Egg Residues of Amoxicillin, Single and in Combination with Bromhexine, in Laying Hens.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY Pathogens Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.3390/pathogens13110982
Jeong-Won Kim, Ji-Soo Jeong, Jin-Hwa Kim, Chang-Yeop Kim, Eun-Hye Chung, So-Young Boo, Soo-Ha Lee, Je-Won Ko, Tae-Won Kim
{"title":"Comparative Pharmacokinetics and Egg Residues of Amoxicillin, Single and in Combination with Bromhexine, in Laying Hens.","authors":"Jeong-Won Kim, Ji-Soo Jeong, Jin-Hwa Kim, Chang-Yeop Kim, Eun-Hye Chung, So-Young Boo, Soo-Ha Lee, Je-Won Ko, Tae-Won Kim","doi":"10.3390/pathogens13110982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The need for antibiotics in commercial laying hens is increasing owing to intensive farming systems. Amoxicillin trihydrate (AMX), an aminopenicillin β-lactam antibiotic, exerts broad bactericidal activity. However, its short half-life necessitates frequent administration to ensure efficacy, thus limiting its use. Herein, we investigated the effect of concurrent administration of bromhexine hydrochloride (BRM), a mucolytic agent, on AMX pharmacokinetics, performing a comparative pharmacokinetic analysis of AMX administration alone and in combination with BRM. AMX (50 mg/kg) was administered by oral gavage once daily for three days alone or in combination with 10 mg/kg BRM. Plasma and egg samples were collected to evaluate pharmacokinetic profiles and egg residues. The area under the curve and maximum plasma concentration values were significantly higher in the AMX + BRM group than the AMX only group. However, there were no significant differences in AMX half-life in the elimination phase (T<sub>1/2</sub>), elimination rate constant (k<sub>el</sub>), or apparent clearance (CL/F) values. In the egg residue study, the withdrawal period for AMX was 5 days in both groups, with no significant difference when using the maximum residue limit (MRL) of 10 μg/kg. The concentration of BRM in the eggs remained at 100 μg/kg up to the fourth day following drug administration. Conclusion: These results confirmed that BRM co-administration increased systemic exposure to AMX, with a negligible residual impact of amoxicillin in eggs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19758,"journal":{"name":"Pathogens","volume":"13 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11597875/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathogens","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13110982","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The need for antibiotics in commercial laying hens is increasing owing to intensive farming systems. Amoxicillin trihydrate (AMX), an aminopenicillin β-lactam antibiotic, exerts broad bactericidal activity. However, its short half-life necessitates frequent administration to ensure efficacy, thus limiting its use. Herein, we investigated the effect of concurrent administration of bromhexine hydrochloride (BRM), a mucolytic agent, on AMX pharmacokinetics, performing a comparative pharmacokinetic analysis of AMX administration alone and in combination with BRM. AMX (50 mg/kg) was administered by oral gavage once daily for three days alone or in combination with 10 mg/kg BRM. Plasma and egg samples were collected to evaluate pharmacokinetic profiles and egg residues. The area under the curve and maximum plasma concentration values were significantly higher in the AMX + BRM group than the AMX only group. However, there were no significant differences in AMX half-life in the elimination phase (T1/2), elimination rate constant (kel), or apparent clearance (CL/F) values. In the egg residue study, the withdrawal period for AMX was 5 days in both groups, with no significant difference when using the maximum residue limit (MRL) of 10 μg/kg. The concentration of BRM in the eggs remained at 100 μg/kg up to the fourth day following drug administration. Conclusion: These results confirmed that BRM co-administration increased systemic exposure to AMX, with a negligible residual impact of amoxicillin in eggs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产蛋母鸡体内阿莫西林(单独使用或与溴己新联合使用)的药代动力学和卵残留比较
由于采用集约化养殖系统,商品蛋鸡对抗生素的需求与日俱增。三水阿莫西林(AMX)是一种氨基青霉素类β-内酰胺抗生素,具有广泛的杀菌活性。然而,由于其半衰期短,必须频繁用药才能确保疗效,因此限制了其使用。在此,我们研究了同时服用粘液溶解剂盐酸溴己新(BRM)对 AMX 药代动力学的影响,并对 AMX 单独服用和与 BRM 联合服用进行了药代动力学比较分析。AMX(50 毫克/千克)单独或与 10 毫克/千克 BRM 联合口服,每天一次,连续三天。收集血浆和鸡蛋样本以评估药代动力学特征和鸡蛋残留。AMX+BRM组的曲线下面积和最大血浆浓度值明显高于仅使用AMX组。然而,AMX 的消除期半衰期(T1/2)、消除速率常数(kel)或表观清除率(CL/F)值均无明显差异。在鸡蛋残留研究中,两组的 AMX 停药期均为 5 天,在使用最大残留限量(MRL)10 μg/kg 时无显著差异。直到用药后第四天,鸡蛋中的 BRM 浓度仍为 100 μg/kg。结论这些结果证实,联合使用 BRM 会增加 AMX 的全身暴露量,而鸡蛋中阿莫西林的残留影响可以忽略不计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pathogens
Pathogens Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
1285
审稿时长
17.75 days
期刊介绍: Pathogens (ISSN 2076-0817) publishes reviews, regular research papers and short notes on all aspects of pathogens and pathogen-host interactions. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodical details must be provided for research articles.
期刊最新文献
Coxsackievirus A6 U.K. Genetic and Clinical Epidemiology Pre- and Post-SARS-CoV-2 Emergence. Analysis of the Correlation Between Toxoplasma gondii Seropositivity and Alzheimer's Disease. Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP): An Innovative Approach for the Environmental Monitoring of SARS-CoV-2. Method to Generate Chlorine Dioxide Gas In Situ for Sterilization of Automated Incubators. Auditory and Vestibular Involvement in Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1