The Impact of Cholecystectomy on Bile Reflux After One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Obesity Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1007/s11695-024-07560-3
Mohammad Javad Farzadmanesh, Masoumeh Shahsavan, Shahab Shahabi Shahmiri, Mahsa Ghorbani, Mohammad Fathi, Nariman Mehrnia, Abdolreza Pazouki, Mohammad Kermansaravi
{"title":"The Impact of Cholecystectomy on Bile Reflux After One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass.","authors":"Mohammad Javad Farzadmanesh, Masoumeh Shahsavan, Shahab Shahabi Shahmiri, Mahsa Ghorbani, Mohammad Fathi, Nariman Mehrnia, Abdolreza Pazouki, Mohammad Kermansaravi","doi":"10.1007/s11695-024-07560-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bile reflux (BR) is an issue after one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). Cholecystectomy can increase BR in patients without a history of metabolic and bariatric surgery. We aimed to evaluate the effect of cholecystectomy on BR after OAGB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational study was conducted between March 2017 and December 2022 including 34 matched adult individuals with a body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m<sup>2</sup> or ≥ 35 in the presence of comorbidities and gallstone disease in preop evaluations who underwent primary OAGB including 17 patients who had undergone cholecystectomy simultaneously or after OAGB (OAGB + LC) and 17 patients without cholecystectomy (OAGB). All patients underwent evaluations for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and bile reflux (BR) using various methods including esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), the GERD-Q questionnaire, and a hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid (HIDA) scan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-four patients were included in this study. BR into the esophagus was not detected in both groups. BR to the gastric pouch was observed in 4 patients (23.5%) of the OAGB group and 6 patients (35.3%) of the OAGB + LC group (P = 0.452). BR to gastric remnant was observed in 6 patients (one and five patients in OAGB and OAGB + LC groups respectively) (P = 0.072). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups, although it was clinically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cholecystectomy after OAGB is not associated with a change in the rate of BR in the gastric pouch but increases the incidence of BR into gastric remnant that may be harmful in the long term.</p>","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-024-07560-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bile reflux (BR) is an issue after one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). Cholecystectomy can increase BR in patients without a history of metabolic and bariatric surgery. We aimed to evaluate the effect of cholecystectomy on BR after OAGB.

Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted between March 2017 and December 2022 including 34 matched adult individuals with a body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m2 or ≥ 35 in the presence of comorbidities and gallstone disease in preop evaluations who underwent primary OAGB including 17 patients who had undergone cholecystectomy simultaneously or after OAGB (OAGB + LC) and 17 patients without cholecystectomy (OAGB). All patients underwent evaluations for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and bile reflux (BR) using various methods including esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), the GERD-Q questionnaire, and a hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid (HIDA) scan.

Results: Thirty-four patients were included in this study. BR into the esophagus was not detected in both groups. BR to the gastric pouch was observed in 4 patients (23.5%) of the OAGB group and 6 patients (35.3%) of the OAGB + LC group (P = 0.452). BR to gastric remnant was observed in 6 patients (one and five patients in OAGB and OAGB + LC groups respectively) (P = 0.072). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups, although it was clinically significant.

Conclusion: Cholecystectomy after OAGB is not associated with a change in the rate of BR in the gastric pouch but increases the incidence of BR into gastric remnant that may be harmful in the long term.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单吻合胃旁路术后胆囊切除术对胆汁反流的影响
背景:胆汁反流(BR)是单吻合胃旁路术(OAGB)后的一个问题。胆囊切除术会增加无代谢和减肥手术史患者的胆汁反流。我们旨在评估胆囊切除术对 OAGB 术后 BR 的影响:这项前瞻性观察研究在 2017 年 3 月至 2022 年 12 月期间进行,包括 34 名匹配的成人,他们在术前评估时体重指数≥ 40 kg/m2 或≥ 35 且存在合并症和胆石症,并接受了原发性 OAGB,其中 17 名患者在接受 OAGB 的同时或之后接受了胆囊切除术(OAGB + LC),17 名患者未接受胆囊切除术(OAGB)。所有患者都接受了胃食管反流病(GERD)和胆汁反流(BR)评估,评估方法包括食管胃十二指肠镜(EGD)、GERD-Q 问卷和肝胆亚氨基二醋酸(HIDA)扫描:本研究共纳入 34 名患者。两组患者均未检测到BR进入食管。OAGB组有4名患者(23.5%)和OAGB + LC组有6名患者(35.3%)观察到BR进入胃袋(P = 0.452)。有 6 例患者(OAGB 组和 OAGB + LC 组分别有 1 例和 5 例患者)观察到残胃 BR(P = 0.072)。两组之间没有统计学意义上的显著差异,但临床意义重大:结论:OAGB术后进行胆囊切除术与胃袋内BR发生率的变化无关,但会增加BR进入残胃的发生率,从长远来看可能是有害的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Surgery
Obesity Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
24.10%
发文量
567
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Obesity Surgery is the official journal of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO). A journal for bariatric/metabolic surgeons, Obesity Surgery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for communicating the latest research, surgical and laparoscopic techniques, for treatment of massive obesity and metabolic disorders. Topics covered include original research, clinical reports, current status, guidelines, historical notes, invited commentaries, letters to the editor, medicolegal issues, meeting abstracts, modern surgery/technical innovations, new concepts, reviews, scholarly presentations and opinions. Obesity Surgery benefits surgeons performing obesity/metabolic surgery, general surgeons and surgical residents, endoscopists, anesthetists, support staff, nurses, dietitians, psychiatrists, psychologists, plastic surgeons, internists including endocrinologists and diabetologists, nutritional scientists, and those dealing with eating disorders.
期刊最新文献
Correction: A Longer Biliopancreatic Limb and Shorter Common Channel Enhance Weight Loss But May Have Harmful Effects in Mouse Models of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. Use of Probiotics and Synbiotics in the Treatment of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth (SIBO) and Other Gastrointestinal Symptoms After Metabolic Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Further Exploration of Calibration Tube Usage in Sleeve Gastrectomy: Balancing Technology and Practice. Time to Put LDL Cholesterol on the Roadmap in Bariatric Surgery Guidelines. Applying the Principles of Trauma-Informed Care to the Evaluation and Management of Patients Who Undergo Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1