Depuration of Aliarcobacter butzleri and Malaciobacter molluscorum in Comparison with Escherichia coli in Mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis) and Oysters (Crassostrea gigas).

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY Pathogens Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.3390/pathogens13110973
Nuria Salas-Massó, Ana Fernández-Bravo, Edgar Bertomeu, Karl B Andree, Maria José Figueras, Dolors Furones
{"title":"Depuration of <i>Aliarcobacter butzleri</i> and <i>Malaciobacter molluscorum</i> in Comparison with <i>Escherichia coli</i> in Mussels (<i>Mytilus galloprovincialis</i>) and Oysters (<i>Crassostrea gigas</i>).","authors":"Nuria Salas-Massó, Ana Fernández-Bravo, Edgar Bertomeu, Karl B Andree, Maria José Figueras, Dolors Furones","doi":"10.3390/pathogens13110973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Arcobacter</i>-related species are considered emerging food-borne and waterborne pathogens, with shellfish being a suggested reservoir. In a published study that investigated 204 shellfish samples and 476 isolates, the species <i>Arcobacter butzleri</i> (now known as <i>Aliarcobacter butzleri</i>) and <i>Arcobacter molluscorum</i> (now known as <i>Malaciobacter molluscorum</i>) have been isolated as the most dominant species. However, the efficiency of depuration for eliminating <i>A. butzleri</i> and <i>M. molluscorum</i> in comparison with <i>Escherichia coli</i> from mussels and oysters is unknown and is therefore the objective of this investigation. The shellfish depuration process was evaluated in the laboratory, in summer and winter, using mussels and oysters collected from the Ebro Delta harvesting areas after performing a natural contamination and an artificial contamination using the same conditions for both mollusk and seasons. The natural contamination was performed by exposing the shellfish to a freshwater channel that receives untreated sewage from the village of Poble Nou (PNC) and that had a salinity of 10.7-16.8‱. The artificial contamination exposed the shellfish to <i>A. butzleri</i> and <i>E. coli</i> (in one tank) and to <i>M. molluscorum</i> and <i>E. coli</i> in another tank under controlled conditions of salinity (34.5‱) and temperature (20 °C summer and 14 °C winter). When evaluating the reduction in the bacteria load (every 24 h) throughout 120 h, the naturally contaminated shellfish at the PNC showed a higher reduction than the shellfish contaminated at the laboratory, with the exception of <i>M. molluscorum</i>, that at 24 h could not be detected in summer, neither in mussels nor in oysters. This may be attributed to the fact that the bacteria from the PNC were less adapted to the conditions of high salinity (34.5‱) in which the depuration process was performed. Although temperature did not statistically make a difference in depuration, at 20 °C a higher elimination of all bacteria was recorded relative to 14 °C. In general, <i>E. coli</i> survived more in mussels than in oysters, and <i>M. molluscorum</i> suffered in both mollusks a higher reduction than <i>A. butzleri.</i> New studies are required to determine further the safety of bivalves regarding the presence of <i>Arcobacter</i>-related species.</p>","PeriodicalId":19758,"journal":{"name":"Pathogens","volume":"13 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11597588/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathogens","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13110973","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Arcobacter-related species are considered emerging food-borne and waterborne pathogens, with shellfish being a suggested reservoir. In a published study that investigated 204 shellfish samples and 476 isolates, the species Arcobacter butzleri (now known as Aliarcobacter butzleri) and Arcobacter molluscorum (now known as Malaciobacter molluscorum) have been isolated as the most dominant species. However, the efficiency of depuration for eliminating A. butzleri and M. molluscorum in comparison with Escherichia coli from mussels and oysters is unknown and is therefore the objective of this investigation. The shellfish depuration process was evaluated in the laboratory, in summer and winter, using mussels and oysters collected from the Ebro Delta harvesting areas after performing a natural contamination and an artificial contamination using the same conditions for both mollusk and seasons. The natural contamination was performed by exposing the shellfish to a freshwater channel that receives untreated sewage from the village of Poble Nou (PNC) and that had a salinity of 10.7-16.8‱. The artificial contamination exposed the shellfish to A. butzleri and E. coli (in one tank) and to M. molluscorum and E. coli in another tank under controlled conditions of salinity (34.5‱) and temperature (20 °C summer and 14 °C winter). When evaluating the reduction in the bacteria load (every 24 h) throughout 120 h, the naturally contaminated shellfish at the PNC showed a higher reduction than the shellfish contaminated at the laboratory, with the exception of M. molluscorum, that at 24 h could not be detected in summer, neither in mussels nor in oysters. This may be attributed to the fact that the bacteria from the PNC were less adapted to the conditions of high salinity (34.5‱) in which the depuration process was performed. Although temperature did not statistically make a difference in depuration, at 20 °C a higher elimination of all bacteria was recorded relative to 14 °C. In general, E. coli survived more in mussels than in oysters, and M. molluscorum suffered in both mollusks a higher reduction than A. butzleri. New studies are required to determine further the safety of bivalves regarding the presence of Arcobacter-related species.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将贻贝(Mytilus galloprovincialis)和牡蛎(Crassostrea gigas)中的布氏阿里卡菌(Aliarcobacter butzleri)和软体动物马拉奇菌(Malaciobacter molluscorum)与大肠杆菌(Escherichia coli)进行比较。
Arcobacter 相关菌种被认为是新出现的食源性和水传播病原体,贝类可能是其中的一种。一项已发表的研究调查了 204 个贝类样本和 476 个分离菌株,结果发现,最主要的分离菌株是 Arcobacter butzleri(现名 Aliarcobacter butzleri)和 Arcobacter molluscorum(现名 Malaciobacter molluscorum)。然而,与贻贝和牡蛎中的大肠埃希氏菌相比,去除贝类中的丁兹勒氏菌和软体动物弧菌的效率尚不清楚,因此这也是本次调查的目的所在。在对软体动物和季节采用相同的条件进行自然污染和人工污染后,在实验室对夏季和冬季使用从埃布罗河三角洲收获区采集的贻贝和牡蛎进行贝类净化过程评估。自然污染是将贝类暴露在一条淡水河道中,该河道接收来自 Poble Nou 村(PNC)的未经处理的污水,盐度为 10.7-16.8‱。在盐度(34.5‱)和温度(夏季 20 °C,冬季 14 °C)受控的条件下,人工污染使贝类接触到 A. butzleri 和大肠杆菌(在一个水槽中),以及 M. molluscorum 和大肠杆菌(在另一个水槽中)。在评估整个 120 小时内细菌量(每 24 小时一次)的减少情况时,PNC 天然污染的贝类比实验室污染的贝类细菌量减少得更多,但软体动物甲壳纲除外,在夏季的 24 小时内,无论是在贻贝还是在牡蛎中都检测不到软体动物甲壳纲。这可能是由于来自 PNC 的细菌对高盐度(34.5‱)条件的适应性较差,而净化过程就是在这种条件下进行的。虽然温度对净化没有统计学上的影响,但与 14 °C 相比,在 20 °C 下所有细菌的清除率更高。一般来说,大肠杆菌在贻贝中的存活率高于牡蛎,而在两种软体动物中,M. molluscorum 的减少率高于 A. butzleri。需要进行新的研究,以进一步确定双壳类动物中与弓形杆菌有关的物种的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pathogens
Pathogens Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
1285
审稿时长
17.75 days
期刊介绍: Pathogens (ISSN 2076-0817) publishes reviews, regular research papers and short notes on all aspects of pathogens and pathogen-host interactions. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodical details must be provided for research articles.
期刊最新文献
Coxsackievirus A6 U.K. Genetic and Clinical Epidemiology Pre- and Post-SARS-CoV-2 Emergence. Analysis of the Correlation Between Toxoplasma gondii Seropositivity and Alzheimer's Disease. Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP): An Innovative Approach for the Environmental Monitoring of SARS-CoV-2. Method to Generate Chlorine Dioxide Gas In Situ for Sterilization of Automated Incubators. Auditory and Vestibular Involvement in Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1