Factors Associated With Patient Portal Engagement in Otolaryngology.

IF 1.8 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY OTO Open Pub Date : 2024-11-26 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1002/oto2.70050
Jesse K Siegel, Chloe Verducci, Agnes Hurtuk
{"title":"Factors Associated With Patient Portal Engagement in Otolaryngology.","authors":"Jesse K Siegel, Chloe Verducci, Agnes Hurtuk","doi":"10.1002/oto2.70050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Online patient portals are important tools for patient engagement, and their use has increased particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic and the 21st Century Cures Act. However, prior work across various specialties has demonstrated disparities in patient portal usage with respect to age, gender, race, and insurance status. However, this has not been studied in the field of otolaryngology, and not since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single tertiary care outpatient otolaryngology practice over a 3-year period (December 2019-December 2022).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used univariate and multivariate analyses to measure how patient portal use for appointment scheduling varied before and after the COVID-19 pandemic and across demographic groups including gender, race, age, primary language, insurance type, and primary care physician (PCP) status (Loyola vs non-Loyola).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From December 2019 to December 2022, 49,462 unique patients scheduled 221,611 otolaryngology clinic visits. Significantly more online scheduling occurred after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (10.7% vs 1.9%, <i>P</i> < .01). In multivariate analysis, male gender, age <18 or >65 years, non-English primary language, and outside PCP were all associated with a lower likelihood of online appointment scheduling (<i>P</i> < .01 for each). Patients with Medicare had higher odds of portal use than commercially insured patients when controlling for other demographic variables (<i>P</i> = .034).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patient portal use in otolaryngology has markedly increased over the last 3 years, but utilization varies across demographic groups. This provides an opportunity to improve patient portal content and outreach, and ultimately make portals more accessible to diverse patient populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"8 4","pages":"e70050"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11589654/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OTO Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/oto2.70050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Online patient portals are important tools for patient engagement, and their use has increased particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic and the 21st Century Cures Act. However, prior work across various specialties has demonstrated disparities in patient portal usage with respect to age, gender, race, and insurance status. However, this has not been studied in the field of otolaryngology, and not since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Study design: Retrospective study.

Setting: Single tertiary care outpatient otolaryngology practice over a 3-year period (December 2019-December 2022).

Methods: We used univariate and multivariate analyses to measure how patient portal use for appointment scheduling varied before and after the COVID-19 pandemic and across demographic groups including gender, race, age, primary language, insurance type, and primary care physician (PCP) status (Loyola vs non-Loyola).

Results: From December 2019 to December 2022, 49,462 unique patients scheduled 221,611 otolaryngology clinic visits. Significantly more online scheduling occurred after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (10.7% vs 1.9%, P < .01). In multivariate analysis, male gender, age <18 or >65 years, non-English primary language, and outside PCP were all associated with a lower likelihood of online appointment scheduling (P < .01 for each). Patients with Medicare had higher odds of portal use than commercially insured patients when controlling for other demographic variables (P = .034).

Conclusion: Patient portal use in otolaryngology has markedly increased over the last 3 years, but utilization varies across demographic groups. This provides an opportunity to improve patient portal content and outreach, and ultimately make portals more accessible to diverse patient populations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
耳鼻喉科患者门户网站参与度的相关因素。
目的:在线患者门户网站是促进患者参与的重要工具,尤其是在 COVID-19 大流行和《21 世纪治愈法案》颁布后,其使用率有所上升。然而,此前在各专科开展的工作表明,患者门户网站的使用与年龄、性别、种族和保险状况有关,存在差异。然而,耳鼻喉科领域尚未对此进行过研究,而且自 COVID-19 大流行以来也未进行过研究:研究设计:回顾性研究:研究设计:回顾性研究。研究地点:单一三级医院耳鼻喉科门诊,为期 3 年(2019 年 12 月至 2022 年 12 月):我们使用单变量和多变量分析来衡量在 COVID-19 大流行前后以及不同人口群体(包括性别、种族、年龄、主要语言、保险类型和初级保健医生(PCP)身份(洛约拉与非洛约拉))之间,患者门户网站在预约安排方面的使用情况有何变化:从 2019 年 12 月到 2022 年 12 月,49,462 名患者预约了 221,611 次耳鼻喉科门诊。COVID-19大流行后,在线安排就诊的患者明显增多(10.7% vs 1.9%,P 65岁、非英语主要语言和外部初级保健医生都与在线预约安排就诊的可能性较低有关(P P = .034)):耳鼻喉科患者门户网站的使用率在过去 3 年中显著提高,但不同人群的使用率各不相同。这为改进患者门户网站的内容和推广提供了机会,最终使门户网站更容易为不同的患者群体所使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
OTO Open
OTO Open Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Factors Associated With Patient Portal Engagement in Otolaryngology. Effects of Music on Pain and Anxiety During Otolaryngology Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Impact of Language Barriers and Age on English Hearing Test App Accuracy for Polish Users. Epidemiology of Barbell Weightlifting-Related Head and Neck Injuries in the United States: A 10-Year Analysis of National Injury Data. Beyond Tobacco: Bridging Gaps in Social History Records for Tobacco-Free Nicotine Pouch Consumers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1