Outpatient Medications Deimplemented by the AAP Bronchiolitis Guidelines: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pediatric Pulmonology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1002/ppul.27391
Larry Mellick, Paul Walsh, Clista Clanton, Sarathi Kalra, Shane McKinney
{"title":"Outpatient Medications Deimplemented by the AAP Bronchiolitis Guidelines: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses.","authors":"Larry Mellick, Paul Walsh, Clista Clanton, Sarathi Kalra, Shane McKinney","doi":"10.1002/ppul.27391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The 2014 AAP Bronchiolitis Guidelines deimplemented or recommended against the routine therapeutic use of albuterol, hypertonic saline, and epinephrine for infants and children presenting in the outpatient setting. Our objective was to perform an umbrella review of all meta-analyses that included outpatient subanalyses or network meta-analyses with medication treatment comparisons to study the clinical benefits of these deimplemented medications in the outpatient (i.e., primary care, urgent care, and emergency department) setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Searches were performed in the databases PubMed and Scopus and the Web search engine Google Scholar on the following three topics: albuterol and bronchiolitis, epinephrine and bronchiolitis, and hypertonic saline and bronchiolitis. Article types were limited to systematic reviews and meta-analyses with outpatient subanalyses, with English language and age restrictions. The search strategy was based on the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes, Studies (PICOS) framework. The studies were uploaded to Rayyan, a Web-based platform for managing articles of systematic reviews. Citation tracking and manual review of references were performed for the included studies. The meta-analyses and network meta-analyses were reviewed for outpatient subanalyses focused on clinical responses and risk of hospital admission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6 meta-analyses for albuterol, 4 meta-analyses for epinephrine, and 11 meta-analyses for hypertonic saline were included. Our review identified evidence from predominantly low and moderate evidence meta-analyses (assessed using GRADE and AMSTAR 2) indicating that all three deimplemented medications exhibit one or more therapeutic effects and benefits for infants with the bronchiolitis syndrome in the outpatient setting. Effect sizes ranged from medium to near medium. These clinical benefits include decreased hospital admissions and lower clinical severity scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the heterogeneity of patients under the umbrella term \"acute bronchiolitis\" and the potential for some patients to respond clinically to albuterol, hypertonic saline, and epinephrine, current evidence supports conducting therapeutic trials in infants with acute bronchiolitis in outpatient settings. However, further well-designed and adequately powered randomized controlled trials and high-quality meta-analyses are still needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19932,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Pulmonology","volume":" ","pages":"e27391"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.27391","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The 2014 AAP Bronchiolitis Guidelines deimplemented or recommended against the routine therapeutic use of albuterol, hypertonic saline, and epinephrine for infants and children presenting in the outpatient setting. Our objective was to perform an umbrella review of all meta-analyses that included outpatient subanalyses or network meta-analyses with medication treatment comparisons to study the clinical benefits of these deimplemented medications in the outpatient (i.e., primary care, urgent care, and emergency department) setting.

Methods: Searches were performed in the databases PubMed and Scopus and the Web search engine Google Scholar on the following three topics: albuterol and bronchiolitis, epinephrine and bronchiolitis, and hypertonic saline and bronchiolitis. Article types were limited to systematic reviews and meta-analyses with outpatient subanalyses, with English language and age restrictions. The search strategy was based on the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes, Studies (PICOS) framework. The studies were uploaded to Rayyan, a Web-based platform for managing articles of systematic reviews. Citation tracking and manual review of references were performed for the included studies. The meta-analyses and network meta-analyses were reviewed for outpatient subanalyses focused on clinical responses and risk of hospital admission.

Results: A total of 6 meta-analyses for albuterol, 4 meta-analyses for epinephrine, and 11 meta-analyses for hypertonic saline were included. Our review identified evidence from predominantly low and moderate evidence meta-analyses (assessed using GRADE and AMSTAR 2) indicating that all three deimplemented medications exhibit one or more therapeutic effects and benefits for infants with the bronchiolitis syndrome in the outpatient setting. Effect sizes ranged from medium to near medium. These clinical benefits include decreased hospital admissions and lower clinical severity scores.

Conclusions: Given the heterogeneity of patients under the umbrella term "acute bronchiolitis" and the potential for some patients to respond clinically to albuterol, hypertonic saline, and epinephrine, current evidence supports conducting therapeutic trials in infants with acute bronchiolitis in outpatient settings. However, further well-designed and adequately powered randomized controlled trials and high-quality meta-analyses are still needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AAP 支气管炎指南中未执行的门诊用药:综合分析综述》。
背景:2014 AAP 支气管炎指南》取消或建议不要对门诊就诊的婴幼儿常规使用阿布特罗、高渗盐水和肾上腺素。我们的目标是对所有包含门诊子分析或网络荟萃分析的荟萃分析进行总体回顾,这些荟萃分析包含药物治疗比较,研究了在门诊(即初级保健、紧急护理和急诊科)环境中取消使用这些药物的临床益处:在 PubMed 和 Scopus 数据库以及网络搜索引擎 Google Scholar 中对以下三个主题进行了检索:盐酸克仑特罗与支气管炎、肾上腺素与支气管炎、高渗盐水与支气管炎。文章类型仅限于系统综述和荟萃分析,以及门诊病人子分析,并有英语和年龄限制。检索策略基于人群、干预、比较者、结果、研究(PICOS)框架。这些研究被上传到Rayyan平台,这是一个管理系统性综述文章的网络平台。对纳入的研究进行了引文追踪和人工审阅参考文献。荟萃分析和网络荟萃分析针对门诊病人进行了子分析,重点关注临床反应和入院风险:共纳入了 6 项关于阿布特罗的荟萃分析、4 项关于肾上腺素的荟萃分析和 11 项关于高渗盐水的荟萃分析。我们的综述发现了主要来自低度和中度证据荟萃分析的证据(使用 GRADE 和 AMSTAR 2 进行评估),这些证据表明,这三种去势药物在门诊环境中对患有支气管炎综合征的婴儿具有一种或多种治疗效果和益处。疗效大小从中等到接近中等不等。这些临床益处包括减少入院次数和降低临床严重程度评分:鉴于 "急性支气管炎 "这一总称下患者的异质性,以及部分患者可能对阿布特罗、高渗盐水和肾上腺素产生临床反应,目前的证据支持在门诊环境下对患有急性支气管炎的婴儿进行治疗试验。不过,仍需进一步开展设计合理、充分有效的随机对照试验和高质量的荟萃分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Pulmonology
Pediatric Pulmonology 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.90%
发文量
468
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Pulmonology (PPUL) is the foremost global journal studying the respiratory system in disease and in health as it develops from intrauterine life though adolescence to adulthood. Combining explicit and informative analysis of clinical as well as basic scientific research, PPUL provides a look at the many facets of respiratory system disorders in infants and children, ranging from pathological anatomy, developmental issues, and pathophysiology to infectious disease, asthma, cystic fibrosis, and airborne toxins. Focused attention is given to the reporting of diagnostic and therapeutic methods for neonates, preschool children, and adolescents, the enduring effects of childhood respiratory diseases, and newly described infectious diseases. PPUL concentrates on subject matters of crucial interest to specialists preparing for the Pediatric Subspecialty Examinations in the United States and other countries. With its attentive coverage and extensive clinical data, this journal is a principle source for pediatricians in practice and in training and a must have for all pediatric pulmonologists.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor in a Cystic Fibrosis Child With L1077P Mutation. Hamman's Sign and Syndrome: A Reminder of Important Clinical Clues. Impact of Positive Expiratory Pressure Breathing on Gastroesophageal Reflux in Patients With Esophageal Atresia. Implementation of Cystic Fibrosis Responsibility, Independence, Self-Care, Education Program Enhances Cystic Fibrosis Knowledge in Limited Resource Country: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial. Initial Antibiotic Selection Based on Microbiologic History in Pediatric Cystic Fibrosis-Related Pulmonary Exacerbations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1