Correlation of perfusion index change and analgesic efficacy in transforaminal steroid injection for lumbosacral pain, a prospective observational study.

IF 1.3 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-02 DOI:10.4103/sja.sja_244_24
Heley Gatorwala, Ananda Bangera
{"title":"Correlation of perfusion index change and analgesic efficacy in transforaminal steroid injection for lumbosacral pain, a prospective observational study.","authors":"Heley Gatorwala, Ananda Bangera","doi":"10.4103/sja.sja_244_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Low back pain is a common problem and a major burden to society. Transforaminal epidural steroid injection is one of the most effective treatment modalities for back pain. We aim to objectively quantify pain relief of lumbosacral radicular pain post transforaminal steroid injection by correlating perfusion index (PI), reflecting real-time peripheral blood flow change at the site of monitoring, controlled by sympathetic system with Numerical rate score (NRS) and SLRT improvement.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A prospective observational study, conducted at K.S Hegde Medical Academy, Mangaluru, from June 2021 to June 2022 as a time-bound study. After IEC clearance (IEC certificate number) for the procedure and study, patients undergoing transforaminal epidural steroid injection for lumbosacral radicular pain were enrolled, excluding those meeting the exclusion criteria. PI change and NRS score improvement were noted at 0, 5, 10, 15, and 30 minutes along with pre and post-procedure SLRT. Results were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 40 patients were analyzed. PI change at 30 minutes was 2.113 from a baseline of 0.217. Median NRS of 5, improved to 0 and the mean SLRT of 45.17 to 61.45 at the end of 30 minutes. All changes are statistically significant with <i>P</i> (<0.01). correlation between the PI change with NRS is mild (-0.312).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PI change ratio shows an overall improvement in pain levels objectively, in a non-invasive, easy, and reliable way. Simultaneous improvement in both NRS and SLRT is clinically significant but cannot predict a correlated quantitative measure of pain relief.</p>","PeriodicalId":21533,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"18 4","pages":"509-515"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587962/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_244_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Low back pain is a common problem and a major burden to society. Transforaminal epidural steroid injection is one of the most effective treatment modalities for back pain. We aim to objectively quantify pain relief of lumbosacral radicular pain post transforaminal steroid injection by correlating perfusion index (PI), reflecting real-time peripheral blood flow change at the site of monitoring, controlled by sympathetic system with Numerical rate score (NRS) and SLRT improvement.

Material and methods: A prospective observational study, conducted at K.S Hegde Medical Academy, Mangaluru, from June 2021 to June 2022 as a time-bound study. After IEC clearance (IEC certificate number) for the procedure and study, patients undergoing transforaminal epidural steroid injection for lumbosacral radicular pain were enrolled, excluding those meeting the exclusion criteria. PI change and NRS score improvement were noted at 0, 5, 10, 15, and 30 minutes along with pre and post-procedure SLRT. Results were analyzed.

Results: A total of 40 patients were analyzed. PI change at 30 minutes was 2.113 from a baseline of 0.217. Median NRS of 5, improved to 0 and the mean SLRT of 45.17 to 61.45 at the end of 30 minutes. All changes are statistically significant with P (<0.01). correlation between the PI change with NRS is mild (-0.312).

Conclusion: PI change ratio shows an overall improvement in pain levels objectively, in a non-invasive, easy, and reliable way. Simultaneous improvement in both NRS and SLRT is clinically significant but cannot predict a correlated quantitative measure of pain relief.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经椎间孔注射类固醇治疗腰骶部疼痛的灌注指数变化与镇痛效果的相关性,一项前瞻性观察研究。
背景和目的:腰背痛是一个常见问题,也是社会的一大负担。经椎间孔硬膜外注射类固醇是治疗腰痛最有效的方法之一。我们旨在通过将反映监测部位实时外周血流变化的灌注指数(PI)、交感系统控制的数值率评分(NRS)和 SLRT 改善情况相关联,客观量化经椎间孔注射类固醇后腰骶部根性疼痛的疼痛缓解情况:这是一项前瞻性观察研究,于 2021 年 6 月至 2022 年 6 月在芒格鲁的 K.S Hegde 医学院进行。经 IEC 批准(IEC 证书编号)后,经椎间孔硬膜外注射类固醇治疗腰骶部根性疼痛的患者被纳入研究,排除了符合排除标准的患者。在 0、5、10、15 和 30 分钟时记录 PI 变化和 NRS 评分改善情况,同时记录术前和术后 SLRT 的情况。对结果进行了分析:结果:共对 40 名患者进行了分析。30 分钟时的 PI 变化为 2.113,而基线为 0.217。30 分钟后,NRS 中位数从 5 降为 0,SLRT 平均值从 45.17 降为 61.45。所有变化均具有统计学意义,P(结论:PI 变化率以一种无创、简单、可靠的方式客观地显示了疼痛水平的整体改善。NRS 和 SLRT 的同时改善具有临床意义,但无法预测疼痛缓解的相关量化指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
141
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant in transverse abdominal plane blocks for cesarean section pain management: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Efficacy of epidural anesthesia in minimally invasive cardiac surgery. ESP block with ropivacaine and magnesium sulfate allows opioid sparing after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Iatrogenic tracheobronchial rupture in a fragile patient: A case report. Management of complete heart block detected during labor: A case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1