Factors influencing white blood cell mobilisation in healthy granulocyte donors.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY Transfusion Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1111/tme.13115
Roman Gonta, Jason M Schenkel, Kimberly Klein, Fernando Martinez, Mayrin Correa Medina
{"title":"Factors influencing white blood cell mobilisation in healthy granulocyte donors.","authors":"Roman Gonta, Jason M Schenkel, Kimberly Klein, Fernando Martinez, Mayrin Correa Medina","doi":"10.1111/tme.13115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Granulocyte transfusions represent a therapeutic option for severely neutropenic patients with bacterial or fungal infections that are otherwise unresponsive to conventional therapy. Prior clinical studies suggest that patients receiving higher granulocyte doses achieve superior outcomes. Consequently, suboptimal donor stimulation and collection leading to lower granulocyte doses likely correlate with worse clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on mobilisation data from 312 granulocyte collections from healthy donors between January 2020 and May 2023. This study was performed in a single blood donor center exclusively supporting a comprehensive cancer center. Donors underwent stimulation with 480 mcg of filgrastim (granulocyte colony stimulating factor [G-CSF]) subcutaneously and 8 mg of dexamethasone orally administered 12 to 14 h before collection. The correlation between donor characteristics (age, gender, body weight (BW), body mass index (BMI), baseline haemoglobin (Hgb), and platelet (PLT) counts) and mobilisation efficiency (Δ WBC, defined as post-mobilisation WBC count-baseline WBC count) was examined to identify factors associated with enhanced mobilisation efficiency. Additionally, the impact of multiple donations on Δ WBC in repeat donors was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median donor age was 43 years (range 18-81), with 224 male and 88 female donors. Female donors exhibited significantly higher baseline PLT counts and post-mobilisation WBC counts. However, donor gender did not significantly affect Δ WBC. A negative correlation was observed between Δ WBC and age (r = -0.235, p = 0.001), with older donors (61-81 years) exhibiting significantly lower mobilisation efficiency. BW and BMI differences had no significant effect on Δ WBC. A positive correlation was identified between baseline PLT count and Δ WBC (r = 0.140, p = 0.014), with females having significantly higher baseline PLT counts (p = 0.0004). No correlation was found between Δ WBC and baseline Hgb (r = 0.004, p = 0.477). Repeat donors showed no statistically significant change in Δ WBC with subsequent donations, with a mean interval of 136.5 days between collections.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mobilisation efficiency was not impacted by donor BW or BMI suggesting that BW-based G-CSF stimulation is not essential for optimising WBC mobilisation. Rather, a fixed single dose of 480 mcg of G-CSF and 8 mg of dexamethasone was sufficient to mobilise donors, thus reducing the procedural costs and the potential risks for medication-related side effects. The positive correlation found between baseline PLT count and Δ WBC suggests that PLT count could be used as a potential predictor of mobilisation efficiency. Mobilisation response in up to four collections in repeat granulocytes donors was not affected in subsequent donations. However, sample size is a limitation, and more data is needed for a meaningful conclusion of whether frequent granulocyte donations are safe and effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":23306,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tme.13115","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Granulocyte transfusions represent a therapeutic option for severely neutropenic patients with bacterial or fungal infections that are otherwise unresponsive to conventional therapy. Prior clinical studies suggest that patients receiving higher granulocyte doses achieve superior outcomes. Consequently, suboptimal donor stimulation and collection leading to lower granulocyte doses likely correlate with worse clinical outcomes.

Study design: A retrospective analysis was conducted on mobilisation data from 312 granulocyte collections from healthy donors between January 2020 and May 2023. This study was performed in a single blood donor center exclusively supporting a comprehensive cancer center. Donors underwent stimulation with 480 mcg of filgrastim (granulocyte colony stimulating factor [G-CSF]) subcutaneously and 8 mg of dexamethasone orally administered 12 to 14 h before collection. The correlation between donor characteristics (age, gender, body weight (BW), body mass index (BMI), baseline haemoglobin (Hgb), and platelet (PLT) counts) and mobilisation efficiency (Δ WBC, defined as post-mobilisation WBC count-baseline WBC count) was examined to identify factors associated with enhanced mobilisation efficiency. Additionally, the impact of multiple donations on Δ WBC in repeat donors was assessed.

Results: The median donor age was 43 years (range 18-81), with 224 male and 88 female donors. Female donors exhibited significantly higher baseline PLT counts and post-mobilisation WBC counts. However, donor gender did not significantly affect Δ WBC. A negative correlation was observed between Δ WBC and age (r = -0.235, p = 0.001), with older donors (61-81 years) exhibiting significantly lower mobilisation efficiency. BW and BMI differences had no significant effect on Δ WBC. A positive correlation was identified between baseline PLT count and Δ WBC (r = 0.140, p = 0.014), with females having significantly higher baseline PLT counts (p = 0.0004). No correlation was found between Δ WBC and baseline Hgb (r = 0.004, p = 0.477). Repeat donors showed no statistically significant change in Δ WBC with subsequent donations, with a mean interval of 136.5 days between collections.

Conclusion: Mobilisation efficiency was not impacted by donor BW or BMI suggesting that BW-based G-CSF stimulation is not essential for optimising WBC mobilisation. Rather, a fixed single dose of 480 mcg of G-CSF and 8 mg of dexamethasone was sufficient to mobilise donors, thus reducing the procedural costs and the potential risks for medication-related side effects. The positive correlation found between baseline PLT count and Δ WBC suggests that PLT count could be used as a potential predictor of mobilisation efficiency. Mobilisation response in up to four collections in repeat granulocytes donors was not affected in subsequent donations. However, sample size is a limitation, and more data is needed for a meaningful conclusion of whether frequent granulocyte donations are safe and effective.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响健康粒细胞捐献者白细胞动员的因素。
背景:粒细胞输注是细菌或真菌感染的重度中性粒细胞减少患者的一种治疗选择,否则就会对常规治疗无效。先前的临床研究表明,接受高剂量粒细胞的患者可获得更好的疗效。因此,不合理的供体刺激和采集导致较低的粒细胞剂量可能与较差的临床结果相关:对 2020 年 1 月至 2023 年 5 月期间从健康献血者处采集的 312 个粒细胞的动员数据进行了回顾性分析。这项研究在一家专门支持综合癌症中心的献血中心进行。献血者在采集前 12 至 14 小时皮下注射 480 微克的非格司亭(粒细胞集落刺激因子 [G-CSF])和口服 8 毫克地塞米松。研究了捐献者特征(年龄、性别、体重 (BW)、体重指数 (BMI)、基线血红蛋白 (Hgb) 和血小板 (PLT) 计数)与动员效率(Δ WBC,定义为动员后 WBC 计数-基线 WBC 计数)之间的相关性,以确定与提高动员效率相关的因素。此外,还评估了多次捐献对重复捐献者Δ白细胞的影响:中位捐献者年龄为 43 岁(18-81 岁不等),其中男性捐献者 224 人,女性捐献者 88 人。女性捐献者的基线 PLT 计数和动员后白细胞计数明显更高。然而,捐献者的性别对Δ白细胞没有明显影响。Δ白细胞与年龄呈负相关(r = -0.235,p = 0.001),年龄较大的捐献者(61-81 岁)动员效率明显较低。体重和体重指数的差异对Δ白细胞无明显影响。基线 PLT 计数与Δ白细胞之间呈正相关(r = 0.140,p = 0.014),女性的基线 PLT 计数明显更高(p = 0.0004)。Δ白细胞与基线血红蛋白之间没有相关性(r = 0.004,p = 0.477)。重复捐献者的Δ白细胞在随后的捐献中没有统计学意义上的显著变化,两次捐献之间的平均间隔为 136.5 天:结论:白细胞动员效率不受捐献者体重或体重指数的影响,这表明基于体重的 G-CSF 刺激对优化白细胞动员并不重要。相反,单次固定剂量的 480 微克 G-CSF 和 8 毫克地塞米松就足以动员供体,从而降低了手术成本和药物相关副作用的潜在风险。基线PLT计数与Δ白细胞之间的正相关性表明,PLT计数可作为动员效率的潜在预测指标。重复粒细胞捐献者在最多四次采集中的动员反应在随后的捐献中没有受到影响。然而,样本量是一个限制因素,要想就频繁捐献粒细胞是否安全有效得出有意义的结论,还需要更多的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transfusion Medicine
Transfusion Medicine 医学-血液学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Transfusion Medicine publishes articles on transfusion medicine in its widest context, including blood transfusion practice (blood procurement, pharmaceutical, clinical, scientific, computing and documentary aspects), immunohaematology, immunogenetics, histocompatibility, medico-legal applications, and related molecular biology and biotechnology. In addition to original articles, which may include brief communications and case reports, the journal contains a regular educational section (based on invited reviews and state-of-the-art reports), technical section (including quality assurance and current practice guidelines), leading articles, letters to the editor, occasional historical articles and signed book reviews. Some lectures from Society meetings that are likely to be of general interest to readers of the Journal may be published at the discretion of the Editor and subject to the availability of space in the Journal.
期刊最新文献
Factors influencing white blood cell mobilisation in healthy granulocyte donors. Validation of current commercially-available devices to thaw pooled, solvent/detergent-treated human plasma. Acute normovolemic haemodilution to reduce allogeneic red blood cell transfusion in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. An observational study. An unusual case of reagent interference in transfusion medicine workup: Pan reactive indirect antiglobulin test caused by commercial saline solution. PacBio third-generation sequencing detects a new variant, c.27delC, in exon 1 of the ABO gene resulting in a weak B phenotype.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1