Standardization and Evaluation of the LAMP Technique for the Diagnosis of Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis in Conjunctival Swab Samples Using DNA Extracted by a Silica Column and Boiling.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.3390/tropicalmed9110277
Isabela C S Santos, Daniel M Avelar, Luciana F C Miranda, Cintia X de Mello, Lucas Keidel, Maria Inês F Pimentel, Luanna S Ventura, Aline Fagundes, Fernanda N Santos, Liliane F A Oliveira, Shanna A Santos, Sandro Antonio Pereira, Rodrigo C Menezes, Andreza P Marcelino
{"title":"Standardization and Evaluation of the LAMP Technique for the Diagnosis of Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis in Conjunctival Swab Samples Using DNA Extracted by a Silica Column and Boiling.","authors":"Isabela C S Santos, Daniel M Avelar, Luciana F C Miranda, Cintia X de Mello, Lucas Keidel, Maria Inês F Pimentel, Luanna S Ventura, Aline Fagundes, Fernanda N Santos, Liliane F A Oliveira, Shanna A Santos, Sandro Antonio Pereira, Rodrigo C Menezes, Andreza P Marcelino","doi":"10.3390/tropicalmed9110277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The diagnosis of canine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL) presents a challenge due to a variety of non-specific clinical signs. The available tests have low sensitivity. This study aimed to standardize and evaluate the loop-mediated isothermal amplification technique with K26 target (K26-LAMP) for diagnosis of CVL in conjunctival swab (CS) DNA samples extracted through a silica column commercial kit (SW-kit) and boiling (SW-DB) and to compare sensitivity with conventional PCR (kDNA-cPCR) and quantitative real-time PCR (18S-qPCR). Clinical samples of CSs were collected from 54 dogs after reactive serology tests. Positive parasitological and/or histological tests were used as inclusion criteria for a sensitivity analysis. A total of 79.2% (43/54) of dogs without clinical signs or with mild, moderate, or severe clinical signs were included in the study. The sensitivity results of K26-LAMP, kDNA-cPCR, and 18S-qPCR were 72.1%, 81.4%, and 80.5% with the SW-kit and 97.2%, 95.2%, and 57.1% with SW-DB, respectively. In all techniques, the proportion of positives was higher in the group with severe clinical disease, with statistically significant differences in the K26-LAMP and 18S-qPCR techniques being seen with the SW-kit. The results obtained with LAMP for CS samples are promising and its performance is similar to other techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":23330,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease","volume":"9 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11598160/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed9110277","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The diagnosis of canine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL) presents a challenge due to a variety of non-specific clinical signs. The available tests have low sensitivity. This study aimed to standardize and evaluate the loop-mediated isothermal amplification technique with K26 target (K26-LAMP) for diagnosis of CVL in conjunctival swab (CS) DNA samples extracted through a silica column commercial kit (SW-kit) and boiling (SW-DB) and to compare sensitivity with conventional PCR (kDNA-cPCR) and quantitative real-time PCR (18S-qPCR). Clinical samples of CSs were collected from 54 dogs after reactive serology tests. Positive parasitological and/or histological tests were used as inclusion criteria for a sensitivity analysis. A total of 79.2% (43/54) of dogs without clinical signs or with mild, moderate, or severe clinical signs were included in the study. The sensitivity results of K26-LAMP, kDNA-cPCR, and 18S-qPCR were 72.1%, 81.4%, and 80.5% with the SW-kit and 97.2%, 95.2%, and 57.1% with SW-DB, respectively. In all techniques, the proportion of positives was higher in the group with severe clinical disease, with statistically significant differences in the K26-LAMP and 18S-qPCR techniques being seen with the SW-kit. The results obtained with LAMP for CS samples are promising and its performance is similar to other techniques.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用硅胶柱和煮沸提取的 DNA 诊断犬结膜拭子样本中的内脏利什曼病的 LAMP 技术的标准化和评估。
由于犬内脏利什曼病(CVL)有多种非特异性临床症状,因此其诊断是一项挑战。现有的检测方法灵敏度较低。本研究旨在标准化和评估通过硅胶柱商业试剂盒(SW-kit)和沸腾(SW-DB)提取的结膜拭子(CS)DNA样本中的 K26 靶点环介导等温扩增技术(K26-LAMP),并比较其与传统 PCR(kDNA-cPCR)和定量实时 PCR(18S-qPCR)的灵敏度。在进行反应性血清学检测后,从 54 只狗身上采集了 CS 的临床样本。将寄生虫学和/或组织学检测阳性作为敏感性分析的纳入标准。共有 79.2%(43/54)的无临床症状或有轻度、中度或重度临床症状的狗被纳入研究。K26-LAMP、kDNA-cPCR 和 18S-qPCR 的灵敏度结果分别为:SW-kit 72.1%、81.4% 和 80.5%;SW-DB 97.2%、95.2% 和 57.1%。在所有技术中,临床疾病严重组的阳性比例都较高,K26-LAMP 和 18S-qPCR 技术与 SW 套件的差异在统计学上有显著性。对 CS 样本进行 LAMP 检测的结果很有希望,其性能与其他技术相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.30%
发文量
353
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Serological Tests for Different Disease Stages of Leptospirosis Infection in Humans. Genotyping and Characterizing Plasmodium falciparum to Reveal Genetic Diversity and Multiplicity of Infection by Merozoite Surface Proteins 1 and 2 (msp-1 and msp-2) and Glutamate-Rich Protein (glurp) Genes. Surveillance of Emerging Rodent-Borne Pathogens in Wastewater in Taiwan: A One Health Approach. A Risk Management Approach to Global Pandemics of Infectious Disease and Anti-Microbial Resistance. Community Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices About Malaria: Insights from a Northwestern Colombian Endemic Locality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1