Effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy in complex surgical treatment of necrotizing fasciitis of the upper limb.

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS World Journal of Orthopedics Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.5312/wjo.v15.i11.1015
Konstantin V Lipatov, Arthur Asatryan, George Melkonyan, Aleksandr D Kazantcev, Ekaterina I Solov'eva, Denis V Krivikhin, Irina V Gorbacheva, Urii E Cherkasov
{"title":"Effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy in complex surgical treatment of necrotizing fasciitis of the upper limb.","authors":"Konstantin V Lipatov, Arthur Asatryan, George Melkonyan, Aleksandr D Kazantcev, Ekaterina I Solov'eva, Denis V Krivikhin, Irina V Gorbacheva, Urii E Cherkasov","doi":"10.5312/wjo.v15.i11.1015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) of the upper extremities is a severe surgical pathology, and the incidence of this disease has been steadily increasing in recent decades. Surgical treatment is accompanied by the formation of extensive wounds, which can be treated with significant difficulties. In recent years, negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has proven to be highly effective. It is also promising for the treatment of NF.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the effectiveness of NPWT in the treatment of NF of the upper extremities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The results of the treatment of 36 patients with NF of the upper extremities in two groups (NPWT group and control group; 2022-2023) were retrospectively analyzed. In the NPWT group, the NPWT method (120 mmHg; constant mode) was used after surgical treatment. The number of vacuum-assisted dressings in patients ranged from 1 to 3, depending on the dynamics of the wound process. The duration of fixation of one bandage was up to 2-3 d. In the control group, conventional methods of local wound treatment were used. The following indicators were analyzed: The treatment delay, the prevalence of inflammation, the microbial landscape, the number of debridements, the duration of wound preparation for surgical closure, and the nature of skin plastic surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most patients experienced a significant treatment delay [4 d, interquartile range (IQR): 2-7 d], which led to the spread of the pathological process to the forearm and shoulder. The most common pathogens were <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (14; 38.9%) and <i>Streptococcus pyogenes</i> (22; 61.1%). The average number of debridements <i>per</i> patient was 5 (IQR: 3-7), with no difference between groups. The average time to prepare wounds for surgical closure was 11 ± 4 d in the NPWT group and 29 ± 10 d (<i>P</i> = 0.00001) in the control group. In the NPWT group, the wounds were more often closed with local tissues (15; 83.3%), and in the control group, split-thickness skin grafts were more often used (4; 50%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The predominant isolation of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and/or <i>Streptococcus pyogenes</i> from the lesions allowed us to classify these patients as NF type II. Multiple debridement procedures have become a feature of this disease treatment. The use of NPWT has significantly reduced the time required to prepare wounds for surgical closure. Early closure of wounds allows for more frequent use of local tissue repair, which ensures better results. NPWT is a highly effective way to prepare wounds for early surgical closure in patients with upper extremity NF.</p>","PeriodicalId":47843,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Orthopedics","volume":"15 11","pages":"1015-1022"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11586739/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v15.i11.1015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) of the upper extremities is a severe surgical pathology, and the incidence of this disease has been steadily increasing in recent decades. Surgical treatment is accompanied by the formation of extensive wounds, which can be treated with significant difficulties. In recent years, negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has proven to be highly effective. It is also promising for the treatment of NF.

Aim: To explore the effectiveness of NPWT in the treatment of NF of the upper extremities.

Methods: The results of the treatment of 36 patients with NF of the upper extremities in two groups (NPWT group and control group; 2022-2023) were retrospectively analyzed. In the NPWT group, the NPWT method (120 mmHg; constant mode) was used after surgical treatment. The number of vacuum-assisted dressings in patients ranged from 1 to 3, depending on the dynamics of the wound process. The duration of fixation of one bandage was up to 2-3 d. In the control group, conventional methods of local wound treatment were used. The following indicators were analyzed: The treatment delay, the prevalence of inflammation, the microbial landscape, the number of debridements, the duration of wound preparation for surgical closure, and the nature of skin plastic surgery.

Results: Most patients experienced a significant treatment delay [4 d, interquartile range (IQR): 2-7 d], which led to the spread of the pathological process to the forearm and shoulder. The most common pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus (14; 38.9%) and Streptococcus pyogenes (22; 61.1%). The average number of debridements per patient was 5 (IQR: 3-7), with no difference between groups. The average time to prepare wounds for surgical closure was 11 ± 4 d in the NPWT group and 29 ± 10 d (P = 0.00001) in the control group. In the NPWT group, the wounds were more often closed with local tissues (15; 83.3%), and in the control group, split-thickness skin grafts were more often used (4; 50%).

Conclusion: The predominant isolation of Staphylococcus aureus and/or Streptococcus pyogenes from the lesions allowed us to classify these patients as NF type II. Multiple debridement procedures have become a feature of this disease treatment. The use of NPWT has significantly reduced the time required to prepare wounds for surgical closure. Early closure of wounds allows for more frequent use of local tissue repair, which ensures better results. NPWT is a highly effective way to prepare wounds for early surgical closure in patients with upper extremity NF.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
负压伤口疗法在上肢坏死性筋膜炎复杂手术治疗中的效果。
背景:上肢坏死性筋膜炎(NF)是一种严重的外科病变,近几十年来发病率持续上升。手术治疗伴随着大面积伤口的形成,给治疗带来很大困难。近年来,负压伤口疗法(NPWT)被证明非常有效。目的:探讨负压伤口疗法治疗上肢 NF 的有效性:方法:回顾性分析两组(NPWT 组和对照组;2022-2023 年)36 例上肢 NF 患者的治疗结果。NPWT组在手术治疗后使用NPWT方法(120 mmHg;恒定模式)。患者的真空辅助敷料次数从1次到3次不等,取决于伤口的动态变化。对照组采用传统的局部伤口治疗方法。对以下指标进行了分析:治疗延迟、炎症发生率、微生物状况、清创次数、伤口准备手术缝合的时间以及皮肤整形手术的性质:结果:大多数患者的治疗延迟时间较长[4 d,四分位数间距(IQR):2-7 d],导致病理过程扩散到前臂和肩部。最常见的病原体是金黄色葡萄球菌(14;38.9%)和化脓性链球菌(22;61.1%)。每位患者平均清创次数为 5 次(IQR:3-7),组间无差异。NPWT 组准备手术闭合伤口的平均时间为 11 ± 4 d,对照组为 29 ± 10 d(P = 0.00001)。在 NPWT 组中,更常使用局部组织闭合伤口(15;83.3%),而在对照组中,更常使用分层厚皮移植(4;50%):结论:从创面中主要分离出金黄色葡萄球菌和/或化脓性链球菌,因此我们将这些患者归为 NF II 型。多次清创术已成为该病治疗的一个特点。NPWT 的使用大大缩短了准备手术闭合伤口所需的时间。早期闭合伤口可以更频繁地使用局部组织修复术,从而确保更好的效果。对于上肢 NF 患者来说,NPWT 是为早期手术闭合伤口做好准备的一种高效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
814
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence awareness and perceptions among pediatric orthopedic surgeons: A cross-sectional observational study. Cardiotoxicity concerns in total joint arthroplasty. Effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy in complex surgical treatment of necrotizing fasciitis of the upper limb. Ilizarov technique for treatment of a giant aneurysmal bone cyst at the distal femur: A case report. Gene expression analysis of cytokines and MMPs in melatonin and rhBMP-2 enhanced bone remodeling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1