Inhalation corticosteroids for COVID-19 - a real world data analysis on guideline adherence.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE BJGP Open Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0135
Jasper Wa van Egeraat, Ton Kuijpers, Jako Burgers, Hendrikus van Os, Niels H Chavannes, Tobias N Bonten
{"title":"Inhalation corticosteroids for COVID-19 - a real world data analysis on guideline adherence.","authors":"Jasper Wa van Egeraat, Ton Kuijpers, Jako Burgers, Hendrikus van Os, Niels H Chavannes, Tobias N Bonten","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The recommendation to consider prescribing inhalation corticosteroids to a subgroup of vulnerable COVID-19 patients was added to the Dutch medical guideline on November 11, 2021, and was also adopted by other countries during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the adherence of general practitioners to this guideline, and whether real-world data quality is sufficient to study the effect of revised guidelines on prescribing behaviour.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>A retrospective cohort study using Dutch primary care data from the Extramural LUMC Academic Network database, containing patient data of 129 general practices in the Leiden - The Hague area.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We performed an interrupted time series analysis to measure the effect of the new guideline on the prescription rate of ICS, accounting for general trend and seasonal fluctuations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between July 1, 2020 to August 1, 2022, 131,482 patients had 164,098 COVID-19 consultations. During this period, 1,709 patients received 2094 ICS prescriptions for COVID-19. After the guideline update, there was an instantaneous decrease in prescription rate (IRR 0.47, 95% CI 0.32-0.69). Prescription rate in the subgroup of vulnerable patients did not change significantly (IRR 0.93, 95% CI 0.66-1.32), while less vulnerable patients were significantly prescribed less (IRR 0.29, 95% CI 0.14-0.59).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The revision to COVID-19 guidelines had significant impact on general practitioners' prescription behaviour soon after publication: prescription rate remained constant for vulnerable patients, while less vulnerable patient were significantly prescribed less often. Using electronic health records it is feasible to assess changes in guideline adherence using interrupted time series.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The recommendation to consider prescribing inhalation corticosteroids to a subgroup of vulnerable COVID-19 patients was added to the Dutch medical guideline on November 11, 2021, and was also adopted by other countries during the pandemic.

Aim: To evaluate the adherence of general practitioners to this guideline, and whether real-world data quality is sufficient to study the effect of revised guidelines on prescribing behaviour.

Design & setting: A retrospective cohort study using Dutch primary care data from the Extramural LUMC Academic Network database, containing patient data of 129 general practices in the Leiden - The Hague area.

Method: We performed an interrupted time series analysis to measure the effect of the new guideline on the prescription rate of ICS, accounting for general trend and seasonal fluctuations.

Results: Between July 1, 2020 to August 1, 2022, 131,482 patients had 164,098 COVID-19 consultations. During this period, 1,709 patients received 2094 ICS prescriptions for COVID-19. After the guideline update, there was an instantaneous decrease in prescription rate (IRR 0.47, 95% CI 0.32-0.69). Prescription rate in the subgroup of vulnerable patients did not change significantly (IRR 0.93, 95% CI 0.66-1.32), while less vulnerable patients were significantly prescribed less (IRR 0.29, 95% CI 0.14-0.59).

Conclusion: The revision to COVID-19 guidelines had significant impact on general practitioners' prescription behaviour soon after publication: prescription rate remained constant for vulnerable patients, while less vulnerable patient were significantly prescribed less often. Using electronic health records it is feasible to assess changes in guideline adherence using interrupted time series.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于 COVID-19 的吸入皮质类固醇--关于指南遵守情况的真实世界数据分析。
背景:2021年11月11日,荷兰医疗指南中增加了考虑为COVID-19易感人群开具吸入性皮质类固醇处方的建议,其他国家在大流行期间也采用了该建议。目的:评估全科医生对该指南的遵守情况,以及真实世界的数据质量是否足以研究修订后的指南对处方行为的影响:这是一项回顾性队列研究,使用的荷兰初级保健数据来自校外 LUMC 学术网络数据库,其中包含莱顿-海牙地区 129 家全科诊所的患者数据:我们进行了间断时间序列分析,以衡量新指南对 ICS 处方率的影响,并考虑了总体趋势和季节性波动:从 2020 年 7 月 1 日到 2022 年 8 月 1 日,131482 名患者接受了 164098 次 COVID-19 咨询。在此期间,1709 名患者接受了 2094 份 COVID-19 ICS 处方。指南更新后,处方率瞬间下降(IRR 0.47,95% CI 0.32-0.69)。易感患者亚组的处方率没有明显变化(IRR 0.93,95% CI 0.66-1.32),而较少易感患者的处方显著减少(IRR 0.29,95% CI 0.14-0.59):结论:COVID-19指南修订版发布后不久就对全科医生的处方行为产生了重大影响:易受影响患者的处方率保持不变,而易受影响程度较低的患者的处方次数明显减少。利用电子健康记录,采用间断时间序列评估指南遵守情况的变化是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Lifestyle interventions for depression in primary care: a qualitative study. Factors associated with link workers considering leaving their role: a cross-sectional survey. Adjusting primary-care funding by deprivation: a cross-sectional study of Lower layer Super Output Areas in England. Identifying impaired mental health in patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study in general practice. Utilisation and consequences of CRP point-of-care-testing in primary care practices: a real-world multicentre observational study with 1740 patient cases in Germany.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1