Indicators of clinical deterioration in adult general ward patients from nurses' perspectives: a mixed-methods systematic review.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING BMC Nursing Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1186/s12912-024-02531-6
Jeehae Chung, Hyesil Jung
{"title":"Indicators of clinical deterioration in adult general ward patients from nurses' perspectives: a mixed-methods systematic review.","authors":"Jeehae Chung, Hyesil Jung","doi":"10.1186/s12912-024-02531-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early recognition and response to deteriorating patients in general wards are core competencies for nurses. Clinical deterioration is a worsening condition that increases the risk of morbidity and mortality. Although objective measures are commonly used, recent research suggests that subjective data and nurses' intuitions can serve as valuable indicators for early detection of deterioration in patients. This study aims to comprehensively identify and classify the indicators used to detect clinical deterioration in patients hospitalized in general wards from nurses' perspectives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a mixed-methods systematic review followed a Joanna Briggs Institute Methodology convergent integrated approach. Four electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Scopus) were searched. Studies were screened based on the population of interest (nurses), the phenomenon of interest (patient deterioration), the context (adult care in acute hospital settings), the study type (original studies), and publication in English peer-reviewed journals from January 2014 to December 2023. Two authors independently conducted all screening steps and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies. Any disagreements were resolved through discussion. This review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one studies met the eligibility criteria. Key indicators included vital signs, intake and output, laboratory data, and observational data. Nurses also relied on subjective data from patients' complaints and their own intuition to predict patient deterioration. The frequency and pattern of specific nursing interventions also play an important role.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review identified vital indicators from nurses' perspectives, underscoring the value of subjective observations, intuition, and specific nursing interventions in predicting patient deterioration. Integrating subjective factors with objective data can improve early recognition of and response to clinical deterioration, thereby enhancing patient safety and outcomes. This review provides a foundation for future research aimed at quantifying subjective elements, such as patient complaints and nurses' intuitions, to be included in nursing records as key indicators for predicting patient deterioration.</p><p><strong>Trials registration: </strong>This study was registered with PROSPERO under the registration number CRD42024552344.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"23 1","pages":"861"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02531-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early recognition and response to deteriorating patients in general wards are core competencies for nurses. Clinical deterioration is a worsening condition that increases the risk of morbidity and mortality. Although objective measures are commonly used, recent research suggests that subjective data and nurses' intuitions can serve as valuable indicators for early detection of deterioration in patients. This study aims to comprehensively identify and classify the indicators used to detect clinical deterioration in patients hospitalized in general wards from nurses' perspectives.

Methods: This is a mixed-methods systematic review followed a Joanna Briggs Institute Methodology convergent integrated approach. Four electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Scopus) were searched. Studies were screened based on the population of interest (nurses), the phenomenon of interest (patient deterioration), the context (adult care in acute hospital settings), the study type (original studies), and publication in English peer-reviewed journals from January 2014 to December 2023. Two authors independently conducted all screening steps and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies. Any disagreements were resolved through discussion. This review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis.

Results: Twenty-one studies met the eligibility criteria. Key indicators included vital signs, intake and output, laboratory data, and observational data. Nurses also relied on subjective data from patients' complaints and their own intuition to predict patient deterioration. The frequency and pattern of specific nursing interventions also play an important role.

Conclusions: This review identified vital indicators from nurses' perspectives, underscoring the value of subjective observations, intuition, and specific nursing interventions in predicting patient deterioration. Integrating subjective factors with objective data can improve early recognition of and response to clinical deterioration, thereby enhancing patient safety and outcomes. This review provides a foundation for future research aimed at quantifying subjective elements, such as patient complaints and nurses' intuitions, to be included in nursing records as key indicators for predicting patient deterioration.

Trials registration: This study was registered with PROSPERO under the registration number CRD42024552344.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从护士角度看成人普通病房病人临床病情恶化的指标:混合方法系统综述。
背景:早期识别和应对普通病房病情恶化的病人是护士的核心能力。临床病情恶化会增加发病和死亡风险。虽然客观测量是常用的方法,但最近的研究表明,主观数据和护士的直觉可以作为早期发现患者病情恶化的重要指标。本研究旨在从护士的角度出发,对用于检测普通病房住院患者临床病情恶化的指标进行全面识别和分类:这是一项混合方法的系统性综述,采用了乔安娜-布里格斯研究所的聚合综合方法。检索了四个电子数据库(PubMed、CINAHL、Embase 和 Scopus)。根据研究对象(护士)、研究现象(患者病情恶化)、研究背景(急症医院中的成人护理)、研究类型(原创研究)以及 2014 年 1 月至 2023 年 12 月期间在英文同行评审期刊上的发表情况对研究进行筛选。两位作者独立完成了所有筛选步骤,并对纳入研究的方法学质量进行了评估。任何分歧均通过讨论解决。本综述根据《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》进行报告:21项研究符合资格标准。主要指标包括生命体征、摄入量和排出量、实验室数据和观察数据。护士还依靠病人主诉的主观数据和自己的直觉来预测病人的病情恶化。具体护理干预的频率和模式也起着重要作用:本综述从护士的角度确定了重要指标,强调了主观观察、直觉和特定护理干预在预测患者病情恶化方面的价值。将主观因素与客观数据相结合,可以提高对临床病情恶化的早期识别和应对能力,从而提高患者的安全和治疗效果。本综述为今后的研究奠定了基础,这些研究旨在量化主观因素,如患者投诉和护士的直觉,并将其纳入护理记录,作为预测患者病情恶化的关键指标:本研究已在 PROSPERO 注册,注册号为 CRD42024552344。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
期刊最新文献
Understanding patients' decision to leave hospital care in Ghana: clinical cases and underlying determinants. Association between interpersonal sensitivity and loneliness in college nursing students based on a network approach. Bridging cultural gaps in end-of-life care: the experiences of international charge nurses in Saudi Arabia. Fear of progression in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a cross-sectional study. Correlation between ethical sensitivity and humanistic care ability among undergraduate nursing students: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1