The effect of the combined application of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and local injection of botulinum neurotoxin versus their individual use in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy.
Karim Sami Elsaharty, Ahmed Fekry Salman, Islam H Fayed, Rawda S Ahmed, Rana Nabil Hussien
{"title":"The effect of the combined application of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and local injection of botulinum neurotoxin versus their individual use in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy.","authors":"Karim Sami Elsaharty, Ahmed Fekry Salman, Islam H Fayed, Rawda S Ahmed, Rana Nabil Hussien","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2024.2433596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) is frequently utilized for localized spasticity in patients with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy (CP), while repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) offers a potential therapeutic option.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess and compare BoNT and rTMS effects among children with spastic diplegic CP on spasticity and motor function. Additionally, investigate the potential advantages of combining these therapeutic modalities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy five children (aged 4-8 years) with moderate spastic diplegia, were allocated to one of three groups (25 children in each group): the rTMS group (received 10 hz rTMS, 1500 pulses, two sessions per week for 3 months), the BoNT group (received single BoNT injection), and the combined BoNT-rTMS group. All groups underwent a 3-month physical therapy program. Baseline and post-3-month assessments included the motor function by using Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), and spasticity by using Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), and electromyography (i.e. the ratio between the amplitude of both Hoffman response to muscle response (H/M ratio)).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were a statistically significant difference between groups regarding H/M ratio and GMFCS where <i>p</i> values were (<0.001 and 0.009) respectively. Multivariate regression analysis favored combination therapy over BoNT alone, showing lower odds ratios for MAS (OR = 0.47, <i>p</i> = .04), GMFCS (OR = 0.171, <i>p</i> < .001), and a negative beta coefficient for H/M ratio (Beta = -0.137, <i>p</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BoNT and rTMS reduce CP-related spasticity and improve motor function, however the combined therapy of these modalities demonstrates an additive effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2024.2433596","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) is frequently utilized for localized spasticity in patients with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy (CP), while repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) offers a potential therapeutic option.
Objective: To assess and compare BoNT and rTMS effects among children with spastic diplegic CP on spasticity and motor function. Additionally, investigate the potential advantages of combining these therapeutic modalities.
Methods: Seventy five children (aged 4-8 years) with moderate spastic diplegia, were allocated to one of three groups (25 children in each group): the rTMS group (received 10 hz rTMS, 1500 pulses, two sessions per week for 3 months), the BoNT group (received single BoNT injection), and the combined BoNT-rTMS group. All groups underwent a 3-month physical therapy program. Baseline and post-3-month assessments included the motor function by using Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), and spasticity by using Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), and electromyography (i.e. the ratio between the amplitude of both Hoffman response to muscle response (H/M ratio)).
Results: There were a statistically significant difference between groups regarding H/M ratio and GMFCS where p values were (<0.001 and 0.009) respectively. Multivariate regression analysis favored combination therapy over BoNT alone, showing lower odds ratios for MAS (OR = 0.47, p = .04), GMFCS (OR = 0.171, p < .001), and a negative beta coefficient for H/M ratio (Beta = -0.137, p < .001).
Conclusion: BoNT and rTMS reduce CP-related spasticity and improve motor function, however the combined therapy of these modalities demonstrates an additive effect.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.