Bruna Rainho Rocha, Vanessa Veis Ribeiro, Claudia Pacheco, Glaucya Madazio, Elisabeth Amin, Felipe Moreti, Mara Behlau
{"title":"Validation and Cutoff Value of the Brazilian Version of the Evaluation of the Ability to Sing Easily-EASE.","authors":"Bruna Rainho Rocha, Vanessa Veis Ribeiro, Claudia Pacheco, Glaucya Madazio, Elisabeth Amin, Felipe Moreti, Mara Behlau","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.11.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To validate the Evaluation of the Ability to Sing Easily (EASE) scale for Brazilian Portuguese.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 391 singers participated in the study-192 females and 198 males, with a mean age of 33 years. Validation was performed according to the criteria recommended by the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments, evaluating the following domains, properties, and measurement: reliability (reliability and internal consistency), construct validity (transcultural validity and structural validity), and criterion validity (concurrent criterion validity). Hence, participants responded to the EASE for Brazil (EASE-BR), the Voice Symptoms Scale (VoiSS), the list of signs and symptoms (LSS), and a vocal self-assessment. The EASE-BR was answered a second time 2-15 days after the first application.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Brazilian version of the EASE scale, called EASE-BR, was found to have adequate cross-cultural validity. In construct validity, the 22-item, three-factor model had its structure validated in confirmatory factor analysis with an standardized root mean square residual of 0.066; internal consistency with a high Cronbach's coefficient between 0.902 and 0.779; test-retest reliability with an ICC between 0.72 and 0.52; and concurrent criterion validity significantly correlated with the VoiSS, LSS, and vocal self-assessment (P < 0.05). The cutoff values that differentiated individuals with and without risk for voice changes were 10.5 points for the total, 4.5 for vocal fatigue, 5.5 for the vocal risk index, and 1.5 for vocal concern.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The EASE-BR proved to be a valid and reliable vocal self-assessment instrument in its structure with 22 items and three factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.11.015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To validate the Evaluation of the Ability to Sing Easily (EASE) scale for Brazilian Portuguese.
Methods: A total of 391 singers participated in the study-192 females and 198 males, with a mean age of 33 years. Validation was performed according to the criteria recommended by the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments, evaluating the following domains, properties, and measurement: reliability (reliability and internal consistency), construct validity (transcultural validity and structural validity), and criterion validity (concurrent criterion validity). Hence, participants responded to the EASE for Brazil (EASE-BR), the Voice Symptoms Scale (VoiSS), the list of signs and symptoms (LSS), and a vocal self-assessment. The EASE-BR was answered a second time 2-15 days after the first application.
Results: The Brazilian version of the EASE scale, called EASE-BR, was found to have adequate cross-cultural validity. In construct validity, the 22-item, three-factor model had its structure validated in confirmatory factor analysis with an standardized root mean square residual of 0.066; internal consistency with a high Cronbach's coefficient between 0.902 and 0.779; test-retest reliability with an ICC between 0.72 and 0.52; and concurrent criterion validity significantly correlated with the VoiSS, LSS, and vocal self-assessment (P < 0.05). The cutoff values that differentiated individuals with and without risk for voice changes were 10.5 points for the total, 4.5 for vocal fatigue, 5.5 for the vocal risk index, and 1.5 for vocal concern.
Conclusions: The EASE-BR proved to be a valid and reliable vocal self-assessment instrument in its structure with 22 items and three factors.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.