Ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block with lidocaine vs. saline combined with physical exercises for the rehabilitation of supraspinatus tendinitis: a randomized double-blind controlled trial.

IF 2.5 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) Pub Date : 2024-11-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpain.2024.1490320
Pericles Tey Otani, Roberto Del Valhe Abi Rached, Fabio Marcon Alfieri, Raymundo Soares de Azevedo Neto, Wu Tu Hsing, Linamara Rizzo Battistella, Marta Imamura
{"title":"Ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block with lidocaine vs. saline combined with physical exercises for the rehabilitation of supraspinatus tendinitis: a randomized double-blind controlled trial.","authors":"Pericles Tey Otani, Roberto Del Valhe Abi Rached, Fabio Marcon Alfieri, Raymundo Soares de Azevedo Neto, Wu Tu Hsing, Linamara Rizzo Battistella, Marta Imamura","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2024.1490320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Shoulder pain is the third leading cause of musculoskeletal complaints in primary care clinics. Its prevalence varies from 14% to 34%. Among all the structures that can cause shoulder pain, the most vulnerable to injury is the tendon of the supraspinatus muscle. The ideal management protocol is still unknown. To date, little is known in the literature about the use of ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block as a treatment for supraspinatus muscle tendinitis. Our objective was to assess the effects of the association of a single ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block combined with home-based rotator cuff exercises to reduce pain and improve shoulder functioning in patients with supraspinatus tendinitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated the effect of a single ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block on pain and functioning of people with supraspinatus tendinitis. Diagnosis was performed using the positive Jobe test. Due to large disparity between clinical and radiological findings, only clinical diagnostic criteria were used to select patients. This was a double-blind, randomized, controlled, clinical study in which patients in the intervention group (<i>n</i> = 42) received a single injection of 5 ml of 2% lidocaine, while in the control group (<i>n</i> = 41) patients underwent the same procedure receiving saline solution 0.9%. All patients received face to face instructions by an experienced physiotherapist and a leaflet explaining home-based exercises. Pain and functioning were assessed using the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) questionnaire before the procedure, one week and 12 weeks after the procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in both groups improved significantly since the initial evaluation until the 12th week. Intervention group SPADI (pre, 1 week, 12 weeks): 75.80 ± 18.96, 56.25 ± 31.37, 46.31 ± 31.41 (<i>p</i> < 0.001); Control group SPADI: 75.49 ± 16.67, 50.51 ± 27.58, 49.37 ± 30.90 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences between groups (<i>p</i> = 0.291).</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>We concluded that both lidocaine and saline ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve blocks reduce pain and improve shoulder functioning in patients with supraspinatus tendinitis. Unexpectedly, the same block performed with saline showed similar results and effects.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier [NCT02495818].</p>","PeriodicalId":73097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":"5 ","pages":"1490320"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11588745/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2024.1490320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Shoulder pain is the third leading cause of musculoskeletal complaints in primary care clinics. Its prevalence varies from 14% to 34%. Among all the structures that can cause shoulder pain, the most vulnerable to injury is the tendon of the supraspinatus muscle. The ideal management protocol is still unknown. To date, little is known in the literature about the use of ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block as a treatment for supraspinatus muscle tendinitis. Our objective was to assess the effects of the association of a single ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block combined with home-based rotator cuff exercises to reduce pain and improve shoulder functioning in patients with supraspinatus tendinitis.

Methods: We evaluated the effect of a single ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block on pain and functioning of people with supraspinatus tendinitis. Diagnosis was performed using the positive Jobe test. Due to large disparity between clinical and radiological findings, only clinical diagnostic criteria were used to select patients. This was a double-blind, randomized, controlled, clinical study in which patients in the intervention group (n = 42) received a single injection of 5 ml of 2% lidocaine, while in the control group (n = 41) patients underwent the same procedure receiving saline solution 0.9%. All patients received face to face instructions by an experienced physiotherapist and a leaflet explaining home-based exercises. Pain and functioning were assessed using the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) questionnaire before the procedure, one week and 12 weeks after the procedure.

Results: Patients in both groups improved significantly since the initial evaluation until the 12th week. Intervention group SPADI (pre, 1 week, 12 weeks): 75.80 ± 18.96, 56.25 ± 31.37, 46.31 ± 31.41 (p < 0.001); Control group SPADI: 75.49 ± 16.67, 50.51 ± 27.58, 49.37 ± 30.90 (p < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences between groups (p = 0.291).

Discussion/conclusion: We concluded that both lidocaine and saline ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve blocks reduce pain and improve shoulder functioning in patients with supraspinatus tendinitis. Unexpectedly, the same block performed with saline showed similar results and effects.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier [NCT02495818].

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声引导下使用利多卡因进行肩胛上神经阻滞与使用生理盐水结合体育锻炼进行冈上肌腱炎康复治疗:随机双盲对照试验。
简介肩部疼痛是基层医疗诊所肌肉骨骼疾病的第三大主因。其发病率从 14% 到 34% 不等。在所有可能导致肩痛的结构中,最容易受伤的是冈上肌肌腱。理想的治疗方案仍是未知数。迄今为止,关于在超声引导下使用肩胛上神经阻滞治疗冈上肌肌腱炎的文献还很少。我们的目的是评估单次超声引导下肩胛上神经阻滞结合家庭肩袖锻炼对冈上肌腱炎患者减轻疼痛和改善肩关节功能的效果:我们评估了单次超声引导下肩胛上神经阻滞对冈上肌腱炎患者疼痛和功能的影响。诊断采用阳性乔布试验。由于临床和放射学检查结果之间存在巨大差异,因此仅使用临床诊断标准来选择患者。这是一项双盲、随机对照临床研究,干预组患者(42 人)接受一次 5 毫升 2% 利多卡因注射,而对照组患者(41 人)接受同样的手术,注射 0.9% 生理盐水。所有患者都接受了由经验丰富的物理治疗师提供的面对面指导,以及一份解释家庭锻炼方法的宣传单。术前、术后一周和术后12周,使用肩部疼痛和残疾指数(SPADI)问卷对患者的疼痛和功能进行评估:结果:两组患者自初次评估至术后第12周均有明显改善。干预组 SPADI(术前、术后一周、术后 12 周)75.80±18.96、56.25±31.37、46.31±31.41(P P = 0.291):我们得出的结论是,利多卡因和生理盐水超声引导下的肩胛上神经阻滞都能减轻冈上肌腱炎患者的疼痛并改善肩部功能。出乎意料的是,用生理盐水进行同样的阻滞也显示出相似的结果和效果:临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov,标识符[NCT02495818]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block with lidocaine vs. saline combined with physical exercises for the rehabilitation of supraspinatus tendinitis: a randomized double-blind controlled trial. Functional outcomes and healthcare utilization trends in postsurgical and nonsurgical patients following high-frequency (10 kHz) spinal cord stimulation therapy. The effects of maternal voice on pain during placement of peripherally inserted central catheter in neonates. Vascular and nerve biomarkers in thigh skin biopsies differentiate painful from painless diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Investigating conditioned pain modulation in horses: can the lip-twitch be used as a conditioning stimulus?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1