Development and Testing of the Aftercare Problem List, a Burn Aftercare Screening Instrument.

IF 1 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE European burn journal Pub Date : 2024-03-29 DOI:10.3390/ebj5020008
Nancy E E Van Loey, Elise Boersma-van Dam, Anita Boekelaar, Anneke van de Steenoven, Alette E E de Jong, Helma W C Hofland
{"title":"Development and Testing of the Aftercare Problem List, a Burn Aftercare Screening Instrument.","authors":"Nancy E E Van Loey, Elise Boersma-van Dam, Anita Boekelaar, Anneke van de Steenoven, Alette E E de Jong, Helma W C Hofland","doi":"10.3390/ebj5020008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A growing interest in person-centered care from a biopsychosocial perspective has led to increased attention to structural screening. The aim of this study was to develop an easy-to-comprehend screening instrument using single items to identify a broad range of health-related problems in adult burn survivors. This study builds on earlier work regarding content generation. Focus groups and expert meetings with healthcare providers informed content refinement, resulting in the Aftercare Problem List (APL). The instrument consists of 43 items divided into nine health domains: scars, daily life functioning, scars treatment, body perceptions, stigmatization, intimacy, mental health, relationships, financial concerns, and a positive coping domain. The APL also includes a Distress Thermometer and a question inquiring about preference to discuss the results with a healthcare provider. Subsequently, the APL was completed by 102 outpatients. To test face validity, a linear regression analysis showed that problems in three health domains, i.e., scars, mental health, and body perceptions, were significantly related to higher distress. Qualitative results revealed that a minority found the items difficult which led to further adjustment of the wording and the addition of illustrations. In summation, this study subscribes to the validity of using single items to screen for burn-related problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":72961,"journal":{"name":"European burn journal","volume":"5 2","pages":"90-103"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11545676/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European burn journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ebj5020008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A growing interest in person-centered care from a biopsychosocial perspective has led to increased attention to structural screening. The aim of this study was to develop an easy-to-comprehend screening instrument using single items to identify a broad range of health-related problems in adult burn survivors. This study builds on earlier work regarding content generation. Focus groups and expert meetings with healthcare providers informed content refinement, resulting in the Aftercare Problem List (APL). The instrument consists of 43 items divided into nine health domains: scars, daily life functioning, scars treatment, body perceptions, stigmatization, intimacy, mental health, relationships, financial concerns, and a positive coping domain. The APL also includes a Distress Thermometer and a question inquiring about preference to discuss the results with a healthcare provider. Subsequently, the APL was completed by 102 outpatients. To test face validity, a linear regression analysis showed that problems in three health domains, i.e., scars, mental health, and body perceptions, were significantly related to higher distress. Qualitative results revealed that a minority found the items difficult which led to further adjustment of the wording and the addition of illustrations. In summation, this study subscribes to the validity of using single items to screen for burn-related problems.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
烧伤后护理筛查工具 "烧伤后护理问题清单 "的开发与测试。
从生物心理社会学的角度来看,以人为本的护理越来越受到人们的关注,因此结构性筛查也越来越受到重视。本研究旨在开发一种易于理解的筛查工具,使用单个项目来识别成年烧伤幸存者的各种健康相关问题。本研究建立在先前有关内容生成的工作基础之上。通过与医疗服务提供者进行焦点小组讨论和专家会议,对内容进行了完善,最终形成了 "烧伤后护理问题清单"(APL)。该工具由 43 个项目组成,分为九个健康领域:疤痕、日常生活功能、疤痕治疗、身体感知、耻辱感、亲密关系、心理健康、人际关系、财务问题和积极应对领域。APL 还包括一个压力温度计和一个询问是否愿意与医疗保健提供者讨论结果的问题。随后,102 名门诊患者填写了 APL。为了检验表面效度,线性回归分析表明,三个健康领域(即疤痕、心理健康和身体感知)的问题与较高的痛苦度有显著关系。定性结果表明,少数人认为这些项目比较困难,因此需要进一步调整措辞并增加插图。总之,这项研究证实了使用单一项目筛查烧伤相关问题的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnosis and Treatment of Infections in the Burn Patient. High-Voltage Electrical Burn Requiring Urgent Scalp Reconstruction after Developing a Brain Abscess. Introduction to the Special Issue on Wars and Disasters: Advancing Care during Times of Crisis. The Successful Treatment of Multi-Resistant Colonized Burns with Large-Area Atmospheric Cold Plasma Therapy and Dermis Substitute Matrix-A Case Report. Sustainable Primary Cell Banking for Topical Compound Cytotoxicity Assays: Protocol Validation on Novel Biocides and Antifungals for Optimized Burn Wound Care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1