Arturo Ramirez-Miranda, Angie De-la Mota, Guillermo García-De la Rosa, Juan C Serna-Ojeda, Jorge E Valdez-García, Daniela Fábregas-Sánchez-Woodworth, Alejandro Navas, Aida Jiménez-Corona, Enrique O Graue-Hernandez
{"title":"Visual and refractive outcomes after SMILE versus FS-LASIK: a paired-eye study.","authors":"Arturo Ramirez-Miranda, Angie De-la Mota, Guillermo García-De la Rosa, Juan C Serna-Ojeda, Jorge E Valdez-García, Daniela Fábregas-Sánchez-Woodworth, Alejandro Navas, Aida Jiménez-Corona, Enrique O Graue-Hernandez","doi":"10.24875/CIRU.23000261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare visual acuity, refraction, Schirmer test, tear break-up time (TBUT), esthesiometry, optical quality, higher order aberrations and posterior corneal elevation measurements before and after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Paired eye, randomized, cohort study. Follow-up was performed at days 1 and 7, and at months 1, 3, 6 and 12.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-two eyes were enrolled in the study. Over time, a difference in posterior corneal elevation was statistically significant (p < 0.01) with a greater change in patients treated with SMILE. There was no difference in corrected distance visual acuity and uncorrected distance visual acuity and cylinder between the two techniques; however, there was a statistical significant difference in spherical error and spherical equivalent (p < 0.01). There was no difference between the eyes with FS-LASIK and SMILE in the assessment regarding the TBUT, the Schirmer test and esthesiometry.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SMILE showed more changes in the posterior elevation with a progressive backward shift throughout time during follow-up. SMILE and FS-LASIK provides similar results in myopic patients regarding visual acuity, refraction, Schirmer test, TBUT and esthesiometry.</p>","PeriodicalId":93936,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia y cirujanos","volume":"92 6","pages":"758-768"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia y cirujanos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.23000261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To compare visual acuity, refraction, Schirmer test, tear break-up time (TBUT), esthesiometry, optical quality, higher order aberrations and posterior corneal elevation measurements before and after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK).
Method: Paired eye, randomized, cohort study. Follow-up was performed at days 1 and 7, and at months 1, 3, 6 and 12.
Results: Forty-two eyes were enrolled in the study. Over time, a difference in posterior corneal elevation was statistically significant (p < 0.01) with a greater change in patients treated with SMILE. There was no difference in corrected distance visual acuity and uncorrected distance visual acuity and cylinder between the two techniques; however, there was a statistical significant difference in spherical error and spherical equivalent (p < 0.01). There was no difference between the eyes with FS-LASIK and SMILE in the assessment regarding the TBUT, the Schirmer test and esthesiometry.
Conclusions: SMILE showed more changes in the posterior elevation with a progressive backward shift throughout time during follow-up. SMILE and FS-LASIK provides similar results in myopic patients regarding visual acuity, refraction, Schirmer test, TBUT and esthesiometry.