Visual and refractive outcomes after SMILE versus FS-LASIK: a paired-eye study.

Arturo Ramirez-Miranda, Angie De-la Mota, Guillermo García-De la Rosa, Juan C Serna-Ojeda, Jorge E Valdez-García, Daniela Fábregas-Sánchez-Woodworth, Alejandro Navas, Aida Jiménez-Corona, Enrique O Graue-Hernandez
{"title":"Visual and refractive outcomes after SMILE versus FS-LASIK: a paired-eye study.","authors":"Arturo Ramirez-Miranda, Angie De-la Mota, Guillermo García-De la Rosa, Juan C Serna-Ojeda, Jorge E Valdez-García, Daniela Fábregas-Sánchez-Woodworth, Alejandro Navas, Aida Jiménez-Corona, Enrique O Graue-Hernandez","doi":"10.24875/CIRU.23000261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare visual acuity, refraction, Schirmer test, tear break-up time (TBUT), esthesiometry, optical quality, higher order aberrations and posterior corneal elevation measurements before and after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Paired eye, randomized, cohort study. Follow-up was performed at days 1 and 7, and at months 1, 3, 6 and 12.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-two eyes were enrolled in the study. Over time, a difference in posterior corneal elevation was statistically significant (p < 0.01) with a greater change in patients treated with SMILE. There was no difference in corrected distance visual acuity and uncorrected distance visual acuity and cylinder between the two techniques; however, there was a statistical significant difference in spherical error and spherical equivalent (p < 0.01). There was no difference between the eyes with FS-LASIK and SMILE in the assessment regarding the TBUT, the Schirmer test and esthesiometry.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SMILE showed more changes in the posterior elevation with a progressive backward shift throughout time during follow-up. SMILE and FS-LASIK provides similar results in myopic patients regarding visual acuity, refraction, Schirmer test, TBUT and esthesiometry.</p>","PeriodicalId":93936,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia y cirujanos","volume":"92 6","pages":"758-768"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia y cirujanos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.23000261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare visual acuity, refraction, Schirmer test, tear break-up time (TBUT), esthesiometry, optical quality, higher order aberrations and posterior corneal elevation measurements before and after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK).

Method: Paired eye, randomized, cohort study. Follow-up was performed at days 1 and 7, and at months 1, 3, 6 and 12.

Results: Forty-two eyes were enrolled in the study. Over time, a difference in posterior corneal elevation was statistically significant (p < 0.01) with a greater change in patients treated with SMILE. There was no difference in corrected distance visual acuity and uncorrected distance visual acuity and cylinder between the two techniques; however, there was a statistical significant difference in spherical error and spherical equivalent (p < 0.01). There was no difference between the eyes with FS-LASIK and SMILE in the assessment regarding the TBUT, the Schirmer test and esthesiometry.

Conclusions: SMILE showed more changes in the posterior elevation with a progressive backward shift throughout time during follow-up. SMILE and FS-LASIK provides similar results in myopic patients regarding visual acuity, refraction, Schirmer test, TBUT and esthesiometry.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SMILE与FS-LASIK手术后的视觉和屈光效果:一项配对眼研究。
目的比较小切口皮瓣摘除术(SMILE)和飞秒激光辅助原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)前后的视力、屈光度、Schirmer试验、泪液破裂时间(TBUT)、雌激素测定、光学质量、高阶像差和角膜后隆测量结果:方法:配对眼、随机、队列研究。随访时间为第 1 天、第 7 天、第 1 个月、第 3 个月、第 6 个月和第 12 个月:结果:42 只眼睛参加了研究。随着时间的推移,角膜后隆起的差异有统计学意义(P < 0.01),接受 SMILE 治疗的患者变化更大。两种技术在矫正远距离视力、未矫正远距离视力和柱状体方面没有差异;但在球面误差和球面等值方面有显著统计学差异(p < 0.01)。FS-LASIK和SMILE在TBUT、Schirmer测试和esthesiometry评估方面没有差异:结论:SMILE术后眼球后方隆起的变化更大,在随访期间,后方隆起逐渐后移。SMILE和FS-LASIK在近视患者的视力、屈光度、Schirmer测试、TBUT和眼压测量方面结果相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Hepatocellular carcinoma in a high-complexity public center in Argentina: epidemiological characteristics and therapeutic outcomes]. [Hearing changes in pediatric cancer patients treated with cisplatin]. Kaiser model-based hazard vulnerability analysis in event risk assessment and emergency management of operating room in a hospital in China. The relationship between systemic inflammation response index and clinical and histopathological features in gastric cancer. A marker for acute cholecystitis severity: thiol-disulfide balance and ischemia-modified albumin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1