Reliability and validity of the Italian version of the Caregiver Priorities and Child Health Index of Life with Disabilities in children with cerebral palsy.

Federica Giorgi, Nicolò Sproccati, Corrado Zenesini, Francesca R Pulvirenti, Nicoletta Battisti, Nadia Sommella, Alessandra Feliciangeli, Antonella Cersosimo
{"title":"Reliability and validity of the Italian version of the Caregiver Priorities and Child Health Index of Life with Disabilities in children with cerebral palsy.","authors":"Federica Giorgi, Nicolò Sproccati, Corrado Zenesini, Francesca R Pulvirenti, Nicoletta Battisti, Nadia Sommella, Alessandra Feliciangeli, Antonella Cersosimo","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4806.24.09537-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Caregiver Priorities and Child Health Index of Life with Disabilities (CPCHILD™) questionnaire is a reliable indirect indicator of functional, health status and quality of life in children with severe Cerebral Palsy (CP), as well as the caregiving burden. The aim of the study is to validate the Italian translation of Caregiver Priorities and Child Health Index of Life with Disabilities (CPCHILD™) questionnaire and assess its reliability and validity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted. The study involved 60 caregivers of children with CP, classified according to the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels I-V. There was a self-compilation of the CPCHILD™ by primary caregivers during the clinical visit and a re-administration of the questionnaire 2-3 weeks after the first to a defined sample (N.=30, GMFCS IV-V). The Italian version of CPCHILD™'s psychometric properties were evaluated through internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and validity analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The translated CPCHILD™ questionnaire showed excellent test-retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient - ICC=0.97) across most sections, with significant construct validity, differentiating well between the various GMFCS levels. The internal consistency was robust (Cronbach's alpha=0.852) except for the health section. The face validity indicated high relevance of the questionnaire items to the caregivers, particularly in emotional well-being and social interaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Italian version of CPCHILD™ questionnaire is a reliable and valid tool for assessing the quality of life in children with severe CP, offering insights into the care burden and health status impacts perceived by caregivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":94143,"journal":{"name":"Minerva medica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4806.24.09537-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Caregiver Priorities and Child Health Index of Life with Disabilities (CPCHILD™) questionnaire is a reliable indirect indicator of functional, health status and quality of life in children with severe Cerebral Palsy (CP), as well as the caregiving burden. The aim of the study is to validate the Italian translation of Caregiver Priorities and Child Health Index of Life with Disabilities (CPCHILD™) questionnaire and assess its reliability and validity.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted. The study involved 60 caregivers of children with CP, classified according to the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels I-V. There was a self-compilation of the CPCHILD™ by primary caregivers during the clinical visit and a re-administration of the questionnaire 2-3 weeks after the first to a defined sample (N.=30, GMFCS IV-V). The Italian version of CPCHILD™'s psychometric properties were evaluated through internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and validity analyses.

Results: The translated CPCHILD™ questionnaire showed excellent test-retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient - ICC=0.97) across most sections, with significant construct validity, differentiating well between the various GMFCS levels. The internal consistency was robust (Cronbach's alpha=0.852) except for the health section. The face validity indicated high relevance of the questionnaire items to the caregivers, particularly in emotional well-being and social interaction.

Conclusions: The Italian version of CPCHILD™ questionnaire is a reliable and valid tool for assessing the quality of life in children with severe CP, offering insights into the care burden and health status impacts perceived by caregivers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意大利语版脑瘫儿童照顾者优先事项和残疾儿童生活健康指数的可靠性和有效性。
背景:照顾者优先事项和残疾儿童生活健康指数(CPCHILD™)问卷是一项可靠的间接指标,可反映重度脑瘫(CP)儿童的功能、健康状况和生活质量,以及照顾者的负担。本研究旨在验证意大利语翻译的照顾者优先事项和残疾儿童健康生活指数(CPCHILD™)问卷,并评估其可靠性和有效性:方法:进行了一项横断面研究。研究涉及 60 名根据粗大运动功能分级系统(GMFCS)I-V 级分类的 CP 儿童的照顾者。主要照护者在临床访问期间自行编制了 CPCHILD™,并在第一次问卷调查 2-3 周后对特定样本(N.=30,GMFCS IV-V)重新进行了问卷调查。通过内部一致性、重测信度和有效性分析,对意大利语版 CPCHILD™ 的心理测量特性进行了评估:结果:翻译后的 CPCHILD™ 问卷在大多数部分都显示出极佳的重测信度(类内相关系数 - ICC=0.97),并具有显著的建构效度,能很好地区分 GMFCS 各个级别。除健康部分外,其他部分的内部一致性很好(Cronbach's alpha=0.852)。表面效度表明,问卷项目与照顾者高度相关,尤其是在情绪健康和社会交往方面:意大利版 CPCHILD™ 问卷是评估重度脊柱侧弯症儿童生活质量的可靠而有效的工具,可帮助了解护理人员所感受到的护理负担和健康状况的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hemoptysis of unknown origin: let's put in order the puzzle pieces. Application of percutaneous intervertebral foraminoscopic discectomy in lumbar disc herniation. Diagnosis and treatment of periorbital and orbital cellulitis in children. Type 2 diabetes, heart failure and the treatment of their comorbidity. Fragmented QRS in dialysis patients: too simple to be truly useful or a potential prognostic and diagnostic tool?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1