Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on People with Dementia and their Caregivers: A Multiphase Observational Study from India.

Faheem Arshad, Saadiya Hurzuk, Megha Tiwari, Feba Varghese, Rakshith Maneshwar Hoskeri, Avanthi Paplikar, Sheetal Goyal, Shah Rutul Dhiren, Patel Vishal Ganeshbhai, Mohammed Farhan Ansari, Shashidhar Komaravolu, Chandrashekar Kammammettu, Priya Treesa Thomas, Girish N Rao, Suvarna Alladi
{"title":"Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on People with Dementia and their Caregivers: A Multiphase Observational Study from India.","authors":"Faheem Arshad, Saadiya Hurzuk, Megha Tiwari, Feba Varghese, Rakshith Maneshwar Hoskeri, Avanthi Paplikar, Sheetal Goyal, Shah Rutul Dhiren, Patel Vishal Ganeshbhai, Mohammed Farhan Ansari, Shashidhar Komaravolu, Chandrashekar Kammammettu, Priya Treesa Thomas, Girish N Rao, Suvarna Alladi","doi":"10.2174/0115672050346469241112115052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has had multifaceted and enduring impacts on people with dementia and their caregivers; however, our understanding of the long-term outcomes remains limited. We aimed to explore the long-term effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on cognitive symptoms and vaccination rates in people living with dementia.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study was conducted as a part of a longitudinal study design in two specialized hospitals in South India. In this study, patients with dementia and their caregivers assessed in earlier phases ('period of lockdown with phased relaxations - phase-I' and 'cluster of cases transmission phase - phase-II') were telephonically interviewed. We adopted a quantitative approach to understand disease progression during the three-year course of the pandemic. Changes in cognition and disease severity were measured using the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale. In brief, semistructured interviews were carried out with caregivers of people with dementia to gain insights into vaccination rates. Data obtained from the current study (phase III) were compared against phase I data, which served as the baseline. Among the 72 participants contacted in the current phase, 59 (81·9%) could be reevaluated for dementia severity and vaccination status, whereas 13 (18·0%) had died. Among the 59 participants, 33 (55·9%) had severe dementia (CDR 3). This is in contrast to phases I and II, when 17·6% and 19·2% of the participants, respectively, were classified as CDR 3.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A significant difference in dementia severity between the two phases (phases I and III) was observed. In addition, we observed vaccination hesitancy among caregivers of patients with dementia. This study would provide valuable insights into the long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the cognitive outcomes and vaccination status of patients with dementia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This overall longitudinal study has compared dementia severity between different phases throughout the pandemic, with implications for future studies to tailor home-based support and healthcare interventions in order to meet these evolving needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":94309,"journal":{"name":"Current Alzheimer research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Alzheimer research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115672050346469241112115052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has had multifaceted and enduring impacts on people with dementia and their caregivers; however, our understanding of the long-term outcomes remains limited. We aimed to explore the long-term effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on cognitive symptoms and vaccination rates in people living with dementia.

Method: This study was conducted as a part of a longitudinal study design in two specialized hospitals in South India. In this study, patients with dementia and their caregivers assessed in earlier phases ('period of lockdown with phased relaxations - phase-I' and 'cluster of cases transmission phase - phase-II') were telephonically interviewed. We adopted a quantitative approach to understand disease progression during the three-year course of the pandemic. Changes in cognition and disease severity were measured using the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale. In brief, semistructured interviews were carried out with caregivers of people with dementia to gain insights into vaccination rates. Data obtained from the current study (phase III) were compared against phase I data, which served as the baseline. Among the 72 participants contacted in the current phase, 59 (81·9%) could be reevaluated for dementia severity and vaccination status, whereas 13 (18·0%) had died. Among the 59 participants, 33 (55·9%) had severe dementia (CDR 3). This is in contrast to phases I and II, when 17·6% and 19·2% of the participants, respectively, were classified as CDR 3.

Result: A significant difference in dementia severity between the two phases (phases I and III) was observed. In addition, we observed vaccination hesitancy among caregivers of patients with dementia. This study would provide valuable insights into the long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the cognitive outcomes and vaccination status of patients with dementia.

Conclusion: This overall longitudinal study has compared dementia severity between different phases throughout the pandemic, with implications for future studies to tailor home-based support and healthcare interventions in order to meet these evolving needs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 大流行对痴呆症患者及其护理人员的影响:印度的一项多阶段观察研究。
导言:COVID-19 大流行对痴呆症患者及其护理者产生了多方面的持久影响;然而,我们对其长期结果的了解仍然有限。我们旨在探讨 COVID-19 大流行对痴呆症患者认知症状和疫苗接种率的长期影响:本研究是纵向研究设计的一部分,在南印度的两家专科医院进行。在这项研究中,我们通过电话采访了在早期阶段("阶段性放松的封锁期--第一阶段 "和 "病例群传播阶段--第二阶段")接受评估的痴呆症患者及其护理人员。我们采用定量方法来了解大流行三年期间的疾病进展情况。认知能力和疾病严重程度的变化采用临床痴呆评定量表(CDR)进行测量。此外,还对痴呆症患者的护理人员进行了简短的半结构式访谈,以了解疫苗接种率。本次研究(第三阶段)获得的数据与作为基线的第一阶段数据进行了比较。在本阶段接触的 72 名参与者中,59 人(81-9%)可以重新评估痴呆症的严重程度和疫苗接种情况,而 13 人(18-0%)已经死亡。在 59 名参与者中,33 人(55-9%)患有严重痴呆症(CDR 3)。这与第一阶段和第二阶段的情况截然不同,当时分别有 17-6% 和 19-2% 的参与者被归类为 CDR 3.结果:结果:两个阶段(第一阶段和第三阶段)的痴呆症严重程度存在明显差异。此外,我们还观察到痴呆症患者的护理人员对疫苗接种犹豫不决。这项研究将为了解 COVID-19 大流行对痴呆症患者认知结果和疫苗接种情况的长期影响提供宝贵的见解:这项全面的纵向研究比较了整个大流行期间不同阶段痴呆症的严重程度,这对今后的研究具有重要意义,有助于调整家庭支持和医疗保健干预措施,以满足这些不断变化的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on People with Dementia and their Caregivers: A Multiphase Observational Study from India. A Cross-Sectional Study on the Association between Physical Activity and Cognitive Function Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Tianjin. Correlations between SHBG, Sex Hormones, Inflammation, and Neurocognitive Decline in Alzheimer's Disease:A Retrospective Study. Transforming Alzheimer's Digital Caregiving through Large Language Models. Age-Related Differences in the Association between Life's Essential 8 and Cognition in Cognitively Normal Adults: The CABLE Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1