In search of a sound scientific basis for quantification of soil precompression stress

Per Schjønning, Mathieu Lamandé
{"title":"In search of a sound scientific basis for quantification of soil precompression stress","authors":"Per Schjønning,&nbsp;Mathieu Lamandé","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil compaction is a serious threat to soil functions and ecosystem services. Persistent soil deformation takes place when mechanical stress exceeds soil strength. Risk assessment models typically assume soil to be elastic to a precompression stress level and plastic above this threshold. Currently used procedures for estimating soil precompression stress imply applied stress in a logarithmic form that has been criticized. We performed uniaxial, confined compression tests on 117 soil samples with a well-defined stress history. Strain and stress were recorded at 200 levels of stress in the range of 0–1 MPa. Soil compressibility was calculated as incremental strain per incremental stress, using stress in arithmetic scale. For a given sample, a local minimum in compressibility appeared close to the preload applied to the sample prior to the compression test. This yield stress is suggested as an expression of soil precompression stress. Not all samples displayed a yield stress. Primarily soil exposed to a high preload did not exhibit a clear stress level with change in compressibility. This indicates that a physically based stress level pointing out a transition to plastic conditions will not exist for all soils. Our observation calls for new concepts in risk assessment. Tests with interpolation between a limited number of data points indicate that the yield stress—if existing—may be detected from classical compression data.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.20784","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil compaction is a serious threat to soil functions and ecosystem services. Persistent soil deformation takes place when mechanical stress exceeds soil strength. Risk assessment models typically assume soil to be elastic to a precompression stress level and plastic above this threshold. Currently used procedures for estimating soil precompression stress imply applied stress in a logarithmic form that has been criticized. We performed uniaxial, confined compression tests on 117 soil samples with a well-defined stress history. Strain and stress were recorded at 200 levels of stress in the range of 0–1 MPa. Soil compressibility was calculated as incremental strain per incremental stress, using stress in arithmetic scale. For a given sample, a local minimum in compressibility appeared close to the preload applied to the sample prior to the compression test. This yield stress is suggested as an expression of soil precompression stress. Not all samples displayed a yield stress. Primarily soil exposed to a high preload did not exhibit a clear stress level with change in compressibility. This indicates that a physically based stress level pointing out a transition to plastic conditions will not exist for all soils. Our observation calls for new concepts in risk assessment. Tests with interpolation between a limited number of data points indicate that the yield stress—if existing—may be detected from classical compression data.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为土壤预压缩应力的量化寻找可靠的科学依据
土壤板结是对土壤功能和生态系统服务的严重威胁。当机械应力超过土壤强度时,土壤会发生持续变形。风险评估模型通常假定土壤在预压缩应力水平下是弹性的,而在此临界值以上则是塑性的。目前使用的估算土壤预压缩应力的程序意味着以对数形式施加应力,这已受到批评。我们对 117 个具有明确应力历史的土壤样本进行了单轴封闭压缩试验。在 0-1 兆帕范围内的 200 个应力水平上记录了应变和应力。土壤的可压缩性是根据每增量应力的增量应变来计算的,应力按算术比例计算。对于给定的样本,压缩性的局部最小值出现在压缩试验前对样本施加的预紧力附近。这种屈服应力被认为是土壤预压缩应力的一种表现形式。并非所有样本都显示出屈服应力。主要是受到高预压的土壤并没有随着可压缩性的变化而表现出明显的应力水平。这表明,并不是所有的土壤都会出现基于物理的应力水平,指出向塑性条件的过渡。我们的观察结果要求在风险评估中采用新的概念。在有限的数据点之间进行内插法测试表明,屈服应力(如果存在)可以从传统的压缩数据中检测出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A portable low-cost incubation chamber for real-time characterization of soil respiration Novel slow-release fertilizer promotes nitrogen circularity while increasing soil organic carbon Erratum to: Effects of maize residue and biochar applications on soil δ13C and organic carbon sources in a subtropical paddy rice ecosystem Microbial inocula enhance effects of biochar amendments on crop productivity, soil health, and microbial communities: A meta-analysis Comparison of laser diffractometry and pipetting methods for particle size determination: A pilot study on the implications of result discrepancies on soil classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1