Exploring the effects of RNNs and deep learning frameworks on real-time, lightweight, adaptive time series anomaly detection

IF 1.5 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience Pub Date : 2024-11-03 DOI:10.1002/cpe.8288
Ming-Chang Lee, Jia-Chun Lin, Sokratis Katsikas
{"title":"Exploring the effects of RNNs and deep learning frameworks on real-time, lightweight, adaptive time series anomaly detection","authors":"Ming-Chang Lee,&nbsp;Jia-Chun Lin,&nbsp;Sokratis Katsikas","doi":"10.1002/cpe.8288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Real-time, lightweight, adaptive time series anomaly detection is increasingly critical in cybersecurity, industrial control, finance, healthcare, and many other domains due to its capability to promptly process time series and detect anomalies without requiring extensive computation resources. While numerous anomaly detection approaches have emerged recently, they generally employ a single type of recurrent neural network (RNN) and are implemented using a single type of deep learning framework. The impacts of using various RNN types across different deep learning frameworks on the performance of these approaches remain unclear due to a lack of comprehensive evaluations. In this article, we aim to investigate the impact of different RNN variants and deep learning frameworks on real-time, lightweight, and adaptive time series anomaly detection. We reviewed several state-of-the-art anomaly detection approaches and implemented a representative approach using several RNN variants supported by three popular deep learning frameworks. A thorough evaluation was conducted to analyze the detection accuracy, time efficiency, and resource consumption of each implementation using four real-world, open-source time series datasets. The results show that RNN variants and deep learning frameworks have a significant impact. Therefore, it is crucial to carefully select appropriate RNN variants and deep learning frameworks for the implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":55214,"journal":{"name":"Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience","volume":"36 28","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpe.8288","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpe.8288","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Real-time, lightweight, adaptive time series anomaly detection is increasingly critical in cybersecurity, industrial control, finance, healthcare, and many other domains due to its capability to promptly process time series and detect anomalies without requiring extensive computation resources. While numerous anomaly detection approaches have emerged recently, they generally employ a single type of recurrent neural network (RNN) and are implemented using a single type of deep learning framework. The impacts of using various RNN types across different deep learning frameworks on the performance of these approaches remain unclear due to a lack of comprehensive evaluations. In this article, we aim to investigate the impact of different RNN variants and deep learning frameworks on real-time, lightweight, and adaptive time series anomaly detection. We reviewed several state-of-the-art anomaly detection approaches and implemented a representative approach using several RNN variants supported by three popular deep learning frameworks. A thorough evaluation was conducted to analyze the detection accuracy, time efficiency, and resource consumption of each implementation using four real-world, open-source time series datasets. The results show that RNN variants and deep learning frameworks have a significant impact. Therefore, it is crucial to carefully select appropriate RNN variants and deep learning frameworks for the implementation.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索 RNN 和深度学习框架对实时、轻量级、自适应时间序列异常检测的影响
实时、轻量级、自适应时间序列异常检测在网络安全、工业控制、金融、医疗保健和许多其他领域越来越重要,因为它能够在不需要大量计算资源的情况下及时处理时间序列并检测异常。虽然最近出现了许多异常检测方法,但它们一般都采用单一类型的循环神经网络(RNN),并使用单一类型的深度学习框架来实现。由于缺乏全面的评估,在不同深度学习框架中使用不同类型的 RNN 对这些方法性能的影响仍不清楚。本文旨在研究不同 RNN 变体和深度学习框架对实时、轻量级和自适应时间序列异常检测的影响。我们回顾了几种最先进的异常检测方法,并使用三种流行的深度学习框架支持的几种 RNN 变体实施了一种具有代表性的方法。我们使用四个真实世界的开源时间序列数据集进行了全面评估,分析了每种实现方法的检测精度、时间效率和资源消耗。结果表明,RNN 变体和深度学习框架具有重大影响。因此,仔细选择合适的 RNN 变体和深度学习框架进行实施至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience
Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
664
审稿时长
9.6 months
期刊介绍: Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience (CCPE) publishes high-quality, original research papers, and authoritative research review papers, in the overlapping fields of: Parallel and distributed computing; High-performance computing; Computational and data science; Artificial intelligence and machine learning; Big data applications, algorithms, and systems; Network science; Ontologies and semantics; Security and privacy; Cloud/edge/fog computing; Green computing; and Quantum computing.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Exploring the effects of RNNs and deep learning frameworks on real-time, lightweight, adaptive time series anomaly detection Improving QoS in cloud resources scheduling using dynamic clustering algorithm and SM-CDC scheduling model Mapping Health Pathways: A Network Analysis for Improved Illness Prediction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1