Drill-seeding rice reduces global warming potential but increases nitrogen loss potential compared to water-seeding

Peter J. Geoghan, Bruce A. Linquist
{"title":"Drill-seeding rice reduces global warming potential but increases nitrogen loss potential compared to water-seeding","authors":"Peter J. Geoghan,&nbsp;Bruce A. Linquist","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Flooded rice (<i>Oryza sativa</i> L.) systems are critical for global food security but contribute significantly to anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions due to high methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions from anaerobic soils. Drill-seeding (DS) rice, which in California includes early-season irrigation flushes to establish the rice, has been shown to reduce CH<sub>4</sub> emissions compared to water-seeded (WS) systems. The effect of these early-season flushes on nitrogen (N) fertilizer losses and nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) emissions, however, is not well understood. In a 2-year study, we quantitatively compared DS to WS systems with respect to their global warming potential (GWP) (CH<sub>4</sub> + N<sub>2</sub>O in CO<sub>2</sub> eq.), nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>) accumulation during flushes, and crop N-uptake. Despite 0.68 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> more N<sub>2</sub>O–N emissions in the DS system, GWP was 3700 CO<sub>2</sub> eq. kg ha<sup>−1</sup>, a 42% reduction compared to 6340 CO<sub>2</sub> eq. kg ha<sup>−1</sup> in the WS system. This was due to a 46% reduction in CH<sub>4</sub> in the DS (94.5 CH<sub>4</sub>–C kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) relative to the WS (175.7 CH<sub>4</sub>–C kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) system. Nitrate accumulation in the DS system amounted to 26.2 kg NO<sub>3</sub>–N ha<sup>−1</sup>, and subsequent N losses via denitrification likely contributed to the 22.4 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> less crop N-uptake in the DS system. These results suggest that DS rice has potential for improved environmental impact via GWP reductions but will require increased N inputs. Future efforts should focus on reducing N losses, which have a negative economic impact for the farmer and contribute to N<sub>2</sub>O emissions.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.20783","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Flooded rice (Oryza sativa L.) systems are critical for global food security but contribute significantly to anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions due to high methane (CH4) emissions from anaerobic soils. Drill-seeding (DS) rice, which in California includes early-season irrigation flushes to establish the rice, has been shown to reduce CH4 emissions compared to water-seeded (WS) systems. The effect of these early-season flushes on nitrogen (N) fertilizer losses and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, however, is not well understood. In a 2-year study, we quantitatively compared DS to WS systems with respect to their global warming potential (GWP) (CH4 + N2O in CO2 eq.), nitrate (NO3) accumulation during flushes, and crop N-uptake. Despite 0.68 kg ha−1 more N2O–N emissions in the DS system, GWP was 3700 CO2 eq. kg ha−1, a 42% reduction compared to 6340 CO2 eq. kg ha−1 in the WS system. This was due to a 46% reduction in CH4 in the DS (94.5 CH4–C kg ha−1) relative to the WS (175.7 CH4–C kg ha−1) system. Nitrate accumulation in the DS system amounted to 26.2 kg NO3–N ha−1, and subsequent N losses via denitrification likely contributed to the 22.4 kg N ha−1 less crop N-uptake in the DS system. These results suggest that DS rice has potential for improved environmental impact via GWP reductions but will require increased N inputs. Future efforts should focus on reducing N losses, which have a negative economic impact for the farmer and contribute to N2O emissions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与水稻播种相比,水稻钻播降低了全球变暖的可能性,但增加了氮损失的可能性
淹水水稻(Oryza sativa L.)系统对全球粮食安全至关重要,但由于厌氧土壤的甲烷(CH4)排放量高,因此大大增加了人为温室气体(GHG)排放量。在加利福尼亚,钻播(DS)水稻(包括早季灌溉以建立水稻)与水播(WS)系统相比,可减少甲烷(CH4)排放。然而,这些早季灌溉对氮(N)肥损失和一氧化二氮(N2O)排放的影响尚不十分清楚。在一项为期两年的研究中,我们定量比较了DS与WS系统的全球升温潜能值(GWP)(CH4 + N2O,以CO2当量计)、冲施期间硝酸盐(NO3-)的累积量以及作物的氮吸收量。尽管 DS 系统的 N2O-N 排放量比 WS 系统多 0.68 千克/公顷,但 GWP 为 3700 二氧化碳当量千克/公顷,比 WS 系统的 6340 二氧化碳当量千克/公顷减少了 42%。这是因为 DS 系统中的 CH4(94.5 CH4-C kg ha-1)比 WS 系统(175.7 CH4-C kg ha-1)减少了 46%。在 DS 系统中,硝酸盐累积量为 26.2 千克 NO3-N ha-1,随后通过反硝化作用造成的氮损失可能是 DS 系统中作物氮吸收量减少 22.4 千克 N ha-1 的原因。这些结果表明,DS 稻有可能通过降低全球升温潜能值来改善对环境的影响,但需要增加氮的投入。未来的工作重点应放在减少氮的损失上,因为氮的损失会对农民的经济产生负面影响,并造成一氧化二氮的排放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A portable low-cost incubation chamber for real-time characterization of soil respiration Novel slow-release fertilizer promotes nitrogen circularity while increasing soil organic carbon Erratum to: Effects of maize residue and biochar applications on soil δ13C and organic carbon sources in a subtropical paddy rice ecosystem Microbial inocula enhance effects of biochar amendments on crop productivity, soil health, and microbial communities: A meta-analysis Comparison of laser diffractometry and pipetting methods for particle size determination: A pilot study on the implications of result discrepancies on soil classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1