Learning tracheal intubation with a hyperangulated videolaryngoscopy blade: sub-analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1111/anae.16491
Sascha Ott, Lukas M Müller-Wirtz, Sergio Bustamante, Julian Rössler, Nikolaos J Skubas, Karan Shah, Daniel I Sessler, Alparslan Turan, Kurt Ruetzler
{"title":"Learning tracheal intubation with a hyperangulated videolaryngoscopy blade: sub-analysis of a randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Sascha Ott, Lukas M Müller-Wirtz, Sergio Bustamante, Julian Rössler, Nikolaos J Skubas, Karan Shah, Daniel I Sessler, Alparslan Turan, Kurt Ruetzler","doi":"10.1111/anae.16491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The number of tracheal intubation attempts required to reach proficiency in videolaryngoscopy with hyperangulated blades is unknown. Understanding this training requirement might guide training for clinicians who perform laryngoscopy. We therefore performed a planned sub-analysis of a randomised controlled trial comparing tracheal intubation success with videolaryngoscopy vs. direct laryngoscopy to determine the number of tracheal intubations with a hyperangulated videolaryngoscope blade needed to provide an acceptable first-attempt success rate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included clinicians from a randomised controlled trial who were familiar with direct laryngoscopy and Macintosh-blade videolaryngoscopy but inexperienced with hyperangulated videolaryngoscopy. Cumulative sum statistics were used to generate learning curves with acceptable success rates of 85% and unacceptable success rates of 70% for the primary outcome of first-attempt tracheal intubation success.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 223 clinicians (25 consultants; 35 certified registered nurse anaesthetists; 36 student registered nurse anaesthetists; 46 fellows; and 81 residents) who attempted tracheal intubation in 4312 procedures. The median (IQR [range]) number of tracheal intubations per clinician was 15 (8-25 [1-77]). First-attempt failure was low, with only 72 failed first attempts overall, and was comparable across clinician groups. In total, 133 (60%) clinicians crossed the acceptable success rate boundary while the remaining 90 (40%) clinicians crossed neither the acceptable nor unacceptable success rate boundaries. Among clinicians who crossed the acceptance boundary, the median (IQR [range]) number of attempts for learning was 12 (12-12 [12-26]).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Clinicians experienced in tracheal intubation with direct laryngoscopy but unfamiliar with hyperangulated-blade videolaryngoscopy can achieve proficiency after approximately 12 attempts.</p>","PeriodicalId":7742,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16491","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The number of tracheal intubation attempts required to reach proficiency in videolaryngoscopy with hyperangulated blades is unknown. Understanding this training requirement might guide training for clinicians who perform laryngoscopy. We therefore performed a planned sub-analysis of a randomised controlled trial comparing tracheal intubation success with videolaryngoscopy vs. direct laryngoscopy to determine the number of tracheal intubations with a hyperangulated videolaryngoscope blade needed to provide an acceptable first-attempt success rate.

Methods: We included clinicians from a randomised controlled trial who were familiar with direct laryngoscopy and Macintosh-blade videolaryngoscopy but inexperienced with hyperangulated videolaryngoscopy. Cumulative sum statistics were used to generate learning curves with acceptable success rates of 85% and unacceptable success rates of 70% for the primary outcome of first-attempt tracheal intubation success.

Results: We included 223 clinicians (25 consultants; 35 certified registered nurse anaesthetists; 36 student registered nurse anaesthetists; 46 fellows; and 81 residents) who attempted tracheal intubation in 4312 procedures. The median (IQR [range]) number of tracheal intubations per clinician was 15 (8-25 [1-77]). First-attempt failure was low, with only 72 failed first attempts overall, and was comparable across clinician groups. In total, 133 (60%) clinicians crossed the acceptable success rate boundary while the remaining 90 (40%) clinicians crossed neither the acceptable nor unacceptable success rate boundaries. Among clinicians who crossed the acceptance boundary, the median (IQR [range]) number of attempts for learning was 12 (12-12 [12-26]).

Discussion: Clinicians experienced in tracheal intubation with direct laryngoscopy but unfamiliar with hyperangulated-blade videolaryngoscopy can achieve proficiency after approximately 12 attempts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用超切口视频喉镜刀片学习气管插管:随机对照试验的子分析。
介绍:要熟练掌握使用超切口刀片进行视频喉镜检查,需要尝试多少次气管插管尚不清楚。了解这一培训要求可为临床医生的喉镜检查培训提供指导。因此,我们对一项随机对照试验进行了计划中的子分析,该试验比较了使用视频喉镜与直接喉镜进行气管插管的成功率,以确定使用超切口视频喉镜刀片进行气管插管所需的次数,从而提供可接受的首次尝试成功率:我们纳入了来自随机对照试验的临床医生,他们熟悉直接喉镜检查和麦氏刀片视频喉镜检查,但对超切口视频喉镜检查缺乏经验。在首次尝试气管插管成功率这一主要结果上,我们使用累积总和统计法生成学习曲线,可接受的成功率为 85%,不可接受的成功率为 70%:我们共纳入了 223 名临床医生(25 名顾问、35 名注册麻醉师、36 名注册麻醉师学生、46 名研究员和 81 名住院医师),他们在 4312 次手术中尝试了气管插管。每位临床医生的气管插管次数中位数(IQR [范围])为 15 次(8-25 [1-77])。首次尝试失败率较低,总体上只有 72 例首次尝试失败,各临床医生组之间的失败率相当。共有 133 名临床医生(60%)超过了可接受的成功率界限,其余 90 名临床医生(40%)既没有超过可接受的成功率界限,也没有超过不可接受的成功率界限。在超过可接受范围的临床医生中,尝试学习的中位数(IQR [范围])为 12(12-12 [12-26]):讨论:有直接喉镜气管插管经验,但不熟悉超切口视频喉镜的临床医生在尝试大约 12 次后即可达到熟练程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anaesthesia
Anaesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Association of Anaesthetists is Anaesthesia. It is a comprehensive international publication that covers a wide range of topics. The journal focuses on general and regional anaesthesia, as well as intensive care and pain therapy. It includes original articles that have undergone peer review, covering all aspects of these fields, including research on equipment.
期刊最新文献
Influence of the type of anaesthesia on acute kidney injury after nephrectomy: a randomised controlled trial Augmented reality laryngoscopy and ergonomics: a different stance Efficacy of high‐flow nasal oxygenation during induction of general anaesthesia in parturients living with obesity: a two‐centre, prospective, randomised clinical trial Learning tracheal intubation with a hyperangulated videolaryngoscopy blade: sub-analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Association between self-reported pain experiences in hospital and ratings of care, readmission and emergency department visits: a population-based study from New South Wales, Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1