Strong evidence of an association between hysterectomy and urinary incontinence

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1111/aogs.15024
Karen Ruben Husby, Niels Klarskov
{"title":"Strong evidence of an association between hysterectomy and urinary incontinence","authors":"Karen Ruben Husby,&nbsp;Niels Klarskov","doi":"10.1111/aogs.15024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sir,</p><p>We would like to express our gratitude to the authors for publishing their important and thought-provoking study on risk of urinary incontinence (UI) subsequent to hysterectomy.<span><sup>1</sup></span></p><p>We agree with the authors on the need for a thorough investigation into long-term complications after hysterectomy including risk of subsequent urinary incontinence.</p><p>However, we have concerns regarding the study's methodology, which may account for the study's finding of no association between hysterectomy and UI, in contrast to the robust evidence supporting such an association in previous well-designed population-based studies.<span><sup>2, 3</sup></span></p><p>First, we note that women in the hysterectomy group with a pre-existing diagnosis of UI were excluded (7.8%), while no such exclusions were applied to the control group. This creates a substantial imbalance between the compared groups, as the hysterectomy cohort is selectively screened to include only women without UI at the time of surgery. While we understand the authors' intention to isolate the effect of the hysterectomy itself by excluding pre-existing symptoms, such an approach necessitates similar exclusion criteria for the control group to ensure comparability between the two groups.</p><p>Secondly, there is a notable difference in the timeframes during which women in the two groups were eligible to be diagnosed with UI or to undergo UI surgery. The study includes women up to the age of 54, while the mean age for hysterectomy in the group is 45 years. This leaves limited follow-up time after hysterectomy and may skew the risk of being diagnosed or undergo surgery for UI in the two groups. It does not appear that the authors have adjusted for timeframes or differences in age distribution between the two groups.</p><p>The authors themselves acknowledge that the evidence on the association between hysterectomy and UI is conflicting. However, this is largely due to two smaller studies of questionable nature including one study following women for 30 days post hysterectomy only<span><sup>4</sup></span> and one study excluding all women undergoing a UI surgery post hysterectomy (5%) in the hysterectomy group.<span><sup>5</sup></span> In contrast, larger, well-designed studies have consistently found a significant association,<span><sup>2, 3</sup></span> providing robust evidence of the increased risk of UI following hysterectomy.</p><p>Given the substantial evidence supporting an association between hysterectomy and subsequent UI, it is essential for gynecologists to be aware of this risk and to discuss it with patients as part of the decision-making process when considering hysterectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":6990,"journal":{"name":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","volume":"104 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aogs.15024","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aogs.15024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sir,

We would like to express our gratitude to the authors for publishing their important and thought-provoking study on risk of urinary incontinence (UI) subsequent to hysterectomy.1

We agree with the authors on the need for a thorough investigation into long-term complications after hysterectomy including risk of subsequent urinary incontinence.

However, we have concerns regarding the study's methodology, which may account for the study's finding of no association between hysterectomy and UI, in contrast to the robust evidence supporting such an association in previous well-designed population-based studies.2, 3

First, we note that women in the hysterectomy group with a pre-existing diagnosis of UI were excluded (7.8%), while no such exclusions were applied to the control group. This creates a substantial imbalance between the compared groups, as the hysterectomy cohort is selectively screened to include only women without UI at the time of surgery. While we understand the authors' intention to isolate the effect of the hysterectomy itself by excluding pre-existing symptoms, such an approach necessitates similar exclusion criteria for the control group to ensure comparability between the two groups.

Secondly, there is a notable difference in the timeframes during which women in the two groups were eligible to be diagnosed with UI or to undergo UI surgery. The study includes women up to the age of 54, while the mean age for hysterectomy in the group is 45 years. This leaves limited follow-up time after hysterectomy and may skew the risk of being diagnosed or undergo surgery for UI in the two groups. It does not appear that the authors have adjusted for timeframes or differences in age distribution between the two groups.

The authors themselves acknowledge that the evidence on the association between hysterectomy and UI is conflicting. However, this is largely due to two smaller studies of questionable nature including one study following women for 30 days post hysterectomy only4 and one study excluding all women undergoing a UI surgery post hysterectomy (5%) in the hysterectomy group.5 In contrast, larger, well-designed studies have consistently found a significant association,2, 3 providing robust evidence of the increased risk of UI following hysterectomy.

Given the substantial evidence supporting an association between hysterectomy and subsequent UI, it is essential for gynecologists to be aware of this risk and to discuss it with patients as part of the decision-making process when considering hysterectomy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有确凿证据表明,子宫切除术与尿失禁之间存在关联。
先生,我们非常感谢作者发表了他们关于子宫切除术后尿失禁(UI)风险的重要且发人深省的研究。我们同意作者的观点,需要对子宫切除术后的长期并发症进行彻底的调查,包括随后尿失禁的风险。然而,我们对该研究的方法表示担忧,这可能解释了该研究发现子宫切除术与UI之间没有关联,而之前设计良好的基于人群的研究中有强有力的证据支持这种关联。2,3首先,我们注意到子宫切除术组中已有尿失禁诊断的妇女被排除在外(7.8%),而对照组中没有这样的排除。这在比较组之间造成了实质性的不平衡,因为子宫切除术队列是选择性筛选的,只包括手术时没有尿失禁的妇女。虽然我们理解作者的意图是通过排除预先存在的症状来分离子宫切除术本身的影响,但这种方法需要对对照组采用类似的排除标准,以确保两组之间的可比性。其次,两组女性有资格被诊断为尿失禁或接受尿失禁手术的时间范围存在显著差异。该研究包括54岁以下的女性,而接受子宫切除术的平均年龄为45岁。这使得子宫切除术后随访时间有限,可能会影响两组患者因尿失禁被诊断或接受手术的风险。作者似乎没有对两组之间的时间框架或年龄分布差异进行调整。作者自己也承认,关于子宫切除术和子宫内膜炎之间关系的证据是相互矛盾的。然而,这主要是由于两项性质可疑的小型研究,其中一项研究仅对子宫切除术后30天的女性进行了随访4,另一项研究排除了子宫切除术组中所有在子宫切除术后接受尿失禁手术的女性(5%)相比之下,规模更大、设计良好的研究一致发现了显著的关联,提供了子宫切除术后UI风险增加的有力证据。鉴于有大量证据支持子宫切除术与随后的尿失道之间存在关联,妇科医生在考虑子宫切除术时必须意识到这种风险,并与患者讨论这一风险,作为决策过程的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
180
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Published monthly, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica is an international journal dedicated to providing the very latest information on the results of both clinical, basic and translational research work related to all aspects of women’s health from around the globe. The journal regularly publishes commentaries, reviews, and original articles on a wide variety of topics including: gynecology, pregnancy, birth, female urology, gynecologic oncology, fertility and reproductive biology.
期刊最新文献
Impact of combined oral contraceptives and progestin-only pills on psychological and sexual well-being of women with endometriosis: A systematic review. Current practice of colposuspension in the United Kingdom: Results of a national survey. Clinical characteristics of adolescents and young adults requesting labiaplasty - A Finnish cross-sectional study. Port-site hernia following laparoscopic gynecological surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing in detecting persistent or recurrent disease at follow-up after conization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1