Individual and unit level insights from hospital staff ratings on structural empowerment, leadership-management performance, well-being, and quality of care.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Health Services Research Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-11945-6
Karin Lundin, Maria Engström, Bernice Skytt, Annika Strömberg, Marit Silén
{"title":"Individual and unit level insights from hospital staff ratings on structural empowerment, leadership-management performance, well-being, and quality of care.","authors":"Karin Lundin, Maria Engström, Bernice Skytt, Annika Strömberg, Marit Silén","doi":"10.1186/s12913-024-11945-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Leadership and access to structural empowerment are known to influence the work life experiences of staff and quality of care. Knowledge about relationships between specific factors of structural empowerment, leadership and management, staff well-being and quality of care at both an individual and unit level is scarce.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To study the relationship between staff-rated access to empowering structures, leadership and management performance, well-being, and quality of care in hospital settings measured at the individual level and aggregated at the unit level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional correlative design was applied. Questionnaire data from 331 randomized hospital nursing staff working at 38 units in 25 hospitals in Sweden were analyzed using bivariate correlations and general estimation equation (GEE) models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results from the bivariate analysis of relationships confirmed earlier research. In the GEE models, some unexpected results were found and differences between the individual and unit levels. Adding management and leadership as independent factors in the second model showed few relationships of significance to the outcome variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results confirm the importance of staff access to empowering structures in relation to well-being and quality of care. Differences and similarities were shown when studying these relationships at both the individual and unit level. The findings feature implications for hospital management to promote staff access to empowering structures. The findings provide information on how these structures relate to the individual and the unit; information that could be useful when planning or implementing strategies with the aim to promote staff well-being and care quality. The non-significant results for leadership and management in relation to staff outcomes in the GEE-models, raise questions for further research where a shift from individual to organizational focused performances within the field of leadership is implied.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"24 1","pages":"1491"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11603840/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11945-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Leadership and access to structural empowerment are known to influence the work life experiences of staff and quality of care. Knowledge about relationships between specific factors of structural empowerment, leadership and management, staff well-being and quality of care at both an individual and unit level is scarce.

Aim: To study the relationship between staff-rated access to empowering structures, leadership and management performance, well-being, and quality of care in hospital settings measured at the individual level and aggregated at the unit level.

Methods: A cross-sectional correlative design was applied. Questionnaire data from 331 randomized hospital nursing staff working at 38 units in 25 hospitals in Sweden were analyzed using bivariate correlations and general estimation equation (GEE) models.

Results: Results from the bivariate analysis of relationships confirmed earlier research. In the GEE models, some unexpected results were found and differences between the individual and unit levels. Adding management and leadership as independent factors in the second model showed few relationships of significance to the outcome variables.

Conclusion: Results confirm the importance of staff access to empowering structures in relation to well-being and quality of care. Differences and similarities were shown when studying these relationships at both the individual and unit level. The findings feature implications for hospital management to promote staff access to empowering structures. The findings provide information on how these structures relate to the individual and the unit; information that could be useful when planning or implementing strategies with the aim to promote staff well-being and care quality. The non-significant results for leadership and management in relation to staff outcomes in the GEE-models, raise questions for further research where a shift from individual to organizational focused performances within the field of leadership is implied.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从医院员工对结构授权、领导管理绩效、福利和医疗质量的评分中,了解个人和单位层面的情况。
背景:众所周知,领导力和获得结构性授权会影响员工的工作生活体验和护理质量。目的:研究在医院环境中,从个人层面和单位层面综合衡量员工对赋权结构、领导和管理绩效、员工福利和护理质量之间的关系:方法:采用横断面相关设计。采用双变量相关分析和一般估计方程(GEE)模型对瑞典 25 家医院 38 个科室 331 名随机医院护理人员的问卷数据进行了分析:双变量关系分析的结果证实了之前的研究。在 GEE 模型中,发现了一些意想不到的结果以及个人和单位层面的差异。在第二个模型中,将管理和领导力作为独立因素,结果显示与结果变量之间的显著关系很少:结论:研究结果证实了员工获得授权结构对福利和护理质量的重要性。在研究个人和单位层面的这些关系时,显示出了差异和相似性。研究结果对医院管理层促进员工参与授权结构具有重要意义。研究结果提供了有关这些结构与个人和单位之间关系的信息;这些信息在规划或实施旨在促进员工福利和护理质量的战略时可能非常有用。在 GEE 模型中,领导力和管理对员工结果的影响并不显著,这就提出了进一步研究的问题,即在领导力领域,应将重点从个人转向组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
期刊最新文献
Correlates associated with health insurance on cervical cancer screening in Tanzania: a comparison between the insured and uninsured women using demographic and health survey 2022. Let this be a safe place: a qualitative study into midwifery care for forcibly displaced women in the Netherlands. Feeling valued at work: a qualitative exploration of allied health profession support workers. Improving medical certification of cause of death in Assiut University Children Hospital: an intervention study. Investigation of treatment delay in a complex healthcare process using physician insurance claims data: an application to symptomatic carotid artery stenosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1