How much should the resting heart rate be controlled in patients with atrial fibrillation and coronary heart disease?

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS BMC Cardiovascular Disorders Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1186/s12872-024-04349-1
Yan-Bo Wang, Qing-Hua Yuan, Jie Yuan, Zhi-Min Du, Xiao-Dong Zhuang, Xin-Xue Liao
{"title":"How much should the resting heart rate be controlled in patients with atrial fibrillation and coronary heart disease?","authors":"Yan-Bo Wang, Qing-Hua Yuan, Jie Yuan, Zhi-Min Du, Xiao-Dong Zhuang, Xin-Xue Liao","doi":"10.1186/s12872-024-04349-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current guidelines recommend maintaining a resting heart rate below 100-110 beats per minute (bpm) for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there is a lack of research on various treatment approaches for patients with both atrial fibrillation and coronary heart disease (AF&CHD). We have discussed the primary therapeutic options for controlling resting heart rate in patients with AF&CHD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a post hoc analysis of the AFFIRM (Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management) trial. Our study included 3986(98.2%) participants with AF, of which 1522 had AF&CHD. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. We utilized the chi-squared test to identify significant differences in categorical variables. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to compare the risk of death by standard deviation of heart rate visit to visit variability quartile.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the AF group, a higher proportion of patients in the AF&CHD group had histories of smoking, hypertension, diabetes, heart failure, cardiomyopathy, valvular heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, bradycardia, hepatic or renal disease, pulmonary disease, and stroke (all P < 0.001). Additionally, patients with AF&CHD were more likely to undergo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and pacemaker surgeries than those with AF alone. After adjusting for multiple clinical variables, patients with AF&CHD had a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality compared to the AF group (RR = 1.79, 95% CI: 1.49-2.60; P < 0.01). Nonlinear multivariate curve-fitting analysis identified an optimal resting heart rate of 70 bpm for patients with AF&CHD (P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with a resting heart rate below 70 bpm had lower all-cause mortality than those with a resting heart rate above 70 bpm (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For resting heart rates below 70 bpm, our results suggest an inverse causal relationship between genetically determined resting heart rate and all-cause mortality in patients with AF&CHD.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9195,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders","volume":"24 1","pages":"684"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-024-04349-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current guidelines recommend maintaining a resting heart rate below 100-110 beats per minute (bpm) for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there is a lack of research on various treatment approaches for patients with both atrial fibrillation and coronary heart disease (AF&CHD). We have discussed the primary therapeutic options for controlling resting heart rate in patients with AF&CHD.

Methods: We conducted a post hoc analysis of the AFFIRM (Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management) trial. Our study included 3986(98.2%) participants with AF, of which 1522 had AF&CHD. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. We utilized the chi-squared test to identify significant differences in categorical variables. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to compare the risk of death by standard deviation of heart rate visit to visit variability quartile.

Results: Compared to the AF group, a higher proportion of patients in the AF&CHD group had histories of smoking, hypertension, diabetes, heart failure, cardiomyopathy, valvular heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, bradycardia, hepatic or renal disease, pulmonary disease, and stroke (all P < 0.001). Additionally, patients with AF&CHD were more likely to undergo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and pacemaker surgeries than those with AF alone. After adjusting for multiple clinical variables, patients with AF&CHD had a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality compared to the AF group (RR = 1.79, 95% CI: 1.49-2.60; P < 0.01). Nonlinear multivariate curve-fitting analysis identified an optimal resting heart rate of 70 bpm for patients with AF&CHD (P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with a resting heart rate below 70 bpm had lower all-cause mortality than those with a resting heart rate above 70 bpm (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: For resting heart rates below 70 bpm, our results suggest an inverse causal relationship between genetically determined resting heart rate and all-cause mortality in patients with AF&CHD.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心房颤动和冠心病患者的静息心率应控制在多少?
背景:现行指南建议将心房颤动(房颤)患者的静息心率维持在每分钟 100-110 次(bpm)以下。然而,对于同时患有心房颤动和冠心病(AF&CHD)的患者,目前还缺乏各种治疗方法的研究。我们讨论了控制心房颤动合并冠心病患者静息心率的主要治疗方案:我们对 AFFIRM(心房颤动节律管理随访调查)试验进行了事后分析。我们的研究纳入了 3986 名(98.2%)房颤患者,其中 1522 人患有房颤合并慢性阻塞性肺病。主要结果是全因死亡率。我们采用卡方检验来确定分类变量的显著差异。我们进行了多变量 Cox 回归分析,以比较心率标准偏差访视变异性四分位数的死亡风险:与房颤组相比,房颤合并慢性阻塞性肺病组中有吸烟、高血压、糖尿病、心力衰竭、心肌病、瓣膜性心脏病、外周血管疾病、心动过缓、肝病或肾病、肺病和中风病史的患者比例更高(均为 P 结论:房颤合并慢性阻塞性肺病组中有吸烟、高血压、糖尿病、心力衰竭、心肌病、瓣膜性心脏病、外周血管疾病、心动过缓、肝病或肾病、肺病和中风病史的患者比例更高:对于静息心率低于 70 bpm 的患者,我们的研究结果表明,由基因决定的静息心率与房颤和慢性阻塞性心脏病患者的全因死亡率之间存在反向因果关系:临床试验编号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
480
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cardiovascular Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the heart and circulatory system, as well as related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology, epidemiology, and controlled trials.
期刊最新文献
Association of gene polymorphism in ERG rs2836411 with anemia and susceptibility to aortic dissection. Dietary patterns and premature coronary artery disease: result from the Iran premature coronary artery disease (IPAD) study. How much should the resting heart rate be controlled in patients with atrial fibrillation and coronary heart disease? Are socio-economic inequalities related to cardiovascular disease risk? A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Prognostic value of mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with heart failure: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1