Correlations of strength, proprioception, and dynamic balance to the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool Score among patients with chronic ankle instability: a cross-sectional study.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1186/s12891-024-08092-8
Dehao Peng, Huiru Tang, Min Mao, Qipeng Song, Dewei Mao, Jiangna Wang, Wei Sun
{"title":"Correlations of strength, proprioception, and dynamic balance to the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool Score among patients with chronic ankle instability: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Dehao Peng, Huiru Tang, Min Mao, Qipeng Song, Dewei Mao, Jiangna Wang, Wei Sun","doi":"10.1186/s12891-024-08092-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) is used to screen patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI) and to quantify the severity of ankle instability. Neuromuscular deficits are common in CAI, including proprioception, strength, and balance issues. The relationship between CAIT scores and neuromuscular factors is unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation between ankle instability and ankle muscle strength, proprioception, and dynamic balance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-four individuals with chronic ankle instability were included in this study. The participants' CAIT scores, muscle strength (isokinetic) and proprioception in plantarflexion (PF), dorsiflexion (DF), inversion (IV), and eversion (EV), and dynamic balance (Star Excursion Balance Test in anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral directions) were assessed. Bivariate correlations were used to determine the relationship between CAIT scores and ankle muscle strength, proprioception, and dynamic balance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In terms of muscle strength, ankle PF (r = 0.378, 95%CI: 0.046-0.635, P = 0.027) and IV (r = 0.527, 95%CI: 0.233-0.736, P = 0.001) strength were positively correlated with CAIT Score, whereas ankle DF and EV strength had no significant correlation with CAIT Score. In terms of proprioception, ankle IV proprioception (r = -0.340, 95%CI: -0.608-0.002, P = 0.027) was negatively correlated with CAIT Score, while ankle PF, DF, and EV proprioception had no significant correlation with CAIT Score. In terms of dynamic balance, the SEBT posteromedial (r = 0.444, 95%CI: 0.124-0.680, P = 0.001) was positively correlated with CAIT Score. The SEBT anterior and posterolateral were not significantly correlated with the CAIT Score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found that increasing ankle plantarflexion and inversion muscle strength, improving dynamic balance in the posteromedial direction, and decreasing ankle inversion proprioceptive thresholds may help improve the subjective stability of CAI. This provides data support for targeted ankle neuromuscular function rehabilitation training for patients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2100044089. Registered on 10 March 2021.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"25 1","pages":"970"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-08092-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) is used to screen patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI) and to quantify the severity of ankle instability. Neuromuscular deficits are common in CAI, including proprioception, strength, and balance issues. The relationship between CAIT scores and neuromuscular factors is unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation between ankle instability and ankle muscle strength, proprioception, and dynamic balance.

Methods: Thirty-four individuals with chronic ankle instability were included in this study. The participants' CAIT scores, muscle strength (isokinetic) and proprioception in plantarflexion (PF), dorsiflexion (DF), inversion (IV), and eversion (EV), and dynamic balance (Star Excursion Balance Test in anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral directions) were assessed. Bivariate correlations were used to determine the relationship between CAIT scores and ankle muscle strength, proprioception, and dynamic balance.

Results: In terms of muscle strength, ankle PF (r = 0.378, 95%CI: 0.046-0.635, P = 0.027) and IV (r = 0.527, 95%CI: 0.233-0.736, P = 0.001) strength were positively correlated with CAIT Score, whereas ankle DF and EV strength had no significant correlation with CAIT Score. In terms of proprioception, ankle IV proprioception (r = -0.340, 95%CI: -0.608-0.002, P = 0.027) was negatively correlated with CAIT Score, while ankle PF, DF, and EV proprioception had no significant correlation with CAIT Score. In terms of dynamic balance, the SEBT posteromedial (r = 0.444, 95%CI: 0.124-0.680, P = 0.001) was positively correlated with CAIT Score. The SEBT anterior and posterolateral were not significantly correlated with the CAIT Score.

Conclusion: This study found that increasing ankle plantarflexion and inversion muscle strength, improving dynamic balance in the posteromedial direction, and decreasing ankle inversion proprioceptive thresholds may help improve the subjective stability of CAI. This provides data support for targeted ankle neuromuscular function rehabilitation training for patients.

Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2100044089. Registered on 10 March 2021.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性踝关节不稳定患者的力量、本体感觉和动态平衡与坎伯兰踝关节不稳定工具评分的相关性:一项横断面研究。
背景:坎伯兰踝关节不稳定工具(CAIT)用于筛查慢性踝关节不稳定(CAI)患者,并量化踝关节不稳定的严重程度。神经肌肉缺陷在 CAI 中很常见,包括本体感觉、力量和平衡问题。CAIT 评分与神经肌肉因素之间的关系尚不清楚。本研究旨在调查踝关节不稳定性与踝关节肌肉力量、本体感觉和动态平衡之间的相关性:本研究共纳入 34 名慢性踝关节不稳定患者。评估了参与者的 CAIT 评分、跖屈(PF)、背屈(DF)、内翻(IV)和外翻(EV)的肌力(等动)和本体感觉,以及动态平衡(前、后内侧和后外侧方向的星形激越平衡测试)。双变量相关性用于确定 CAIT 分数与踝关节肌肉力量、本体感觉和动态平衡之间的关系:结果:在肌肉力量方面,踝关节 PF(r = 0.378,95%CI:0.046-0.635,P = 0.027)和 IV(r = 0.527,95%CI:0.233-0.736,P = 0.001)力量与 CAIT 评分呈正相关,而踝关节 DF 和 EV 力量与 CAIT 评分无显著相关性。在本体感觉方面,踝关节 IV 本体感觉(r = -0.340,95%CI:-0.608-0.002,P = 0.027)与 CAIT 评分呈负相关,而踝关节 PF、DF 和 EV 本体感觉与 CAIT 评分无明显相关性。在动态平衡方面,SEBT 后内侧(r = 0.444,95%CI:0.124-0.680,P = 0.001)与 CAIT 评分呈正相关。SEBT前侧和后外侧与CAIT评分无明显相关性:本研究发现,增加踝关节跖屈和内翻肌力、改善后内侧方向的动态平衡以及降低踝关节内翻本体感觉阈值可能有助于改善 CAI 的主观稳定性。这为对患者进行有针对性的踝关节神经肌肉功能康复训练提供了数据支持:中国临床试验注册中心 ChiCTR2100044089。注册日期:2021年3月10日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
期刊最新文献
Associations between folate intake and knee pain, inflammation mediators and comorbid conditions in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Correction: Early versus delayed mobilization for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (small to large sized tear): a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Correlations of strength, proprioception, and dynamic balance to the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool Score among patients with chronic ankle instability: a cross-sectional study. Effects of two posterior procedures for treatment of cervical hyperextension injury with multilevel spinal stenosis: A retrospective study. The association of different types of stress, and stress accumulation with low back pain in call-center workers - a cross-sectional observational study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1