Effects of two posterior procedures for treatment of cervical hyperextension injury with multilevel spinal stenosis: A retrospective study.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1186/s12891-024-08096-4
Zhihao Liang, Tingxian Guo, Yue Xu, Changqing Zhao, Jie Zhao, Xiaofei Cheng
{"title":"Effects of two posterior procedures for treatment of cervical hyperextension injury with multilevel spinal stenosis: A retrospective study.","authors":"Zhihao Liang, Tingxian Guo, Yue Xu, Changqing Zhao, Jie Zhao, Xiaofei Cheng","doi":"10.1186/s12891-024-08096-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervical hyperextension injuries (CHI), commonly resulting in central cord syndrome and spinal instability, often affect the elderly with preexisting degenerative spinal changes, leading to a need for surgical interventions that address both the compression and stability of the cervical spine. This study compares the clinical outcomes of two posterior decompression and fixation procedures for treating cervical hyperextension injury in patients with preexisting multilevel spinal canal stenosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients suffering from cervical hyperextension injury combined with multilevel spinal stenosis were divided into two groups. They received laminoplasty combined with selective unilateral pedicle screw fixation or laminectomy combined with bilateral lateral mass screw fixation. The clinical records including demographic data, operation time, length of hospital stay, estimated blood loss and surgical complications were collected, and clinical outcomes were evaluated using the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale. Preoperative and postoperative cervical lordosis were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative AISA scores were significantly increased compared with that before surgery in both groups, there was no significant differences between groups. The intraoperative blood loss in the laminoplasty group was significantly less than that in the laminectomy group and there were no significant differences in operation time and length of hospital stay between the two groups. No significant difference was found in the incidence of overall surgical complications between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the cervical lordosis after surgery compared with that before surgery in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For patients suffering from cervical hyperextension injury combined with preexisting multilevel spinal stenosis, both cervical laminoplasty with selective unilateral pedicle screw fixation and laminectomy with bilateral lateral mass screw fixation could achieve satisfactory clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"25 1","pages":"972"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-08096-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cervical hyperextension injuries (CHI), commonly resulting in central cord syndrome and spinal instability, often affect the elderly with preexisting degenerative spinal changes, leading to a need for surgical interventions that address both the compression and stability of the cervical spine. This study compares the clinical outcomes of two posterior decompression and fixation procedures for treating cervical hyperextension injury in patients with preexisting multilevel spinal canal stenosis.

Methods: Patients suffering from cervical hyperextension injury combined with multilevel spinal stenosis were divided into two groups. They received laminoplasty combined with selective unilateral pedicle screw fixation or laminectomy combined with bilateral lateral mass screw fixation. The clinical records including demographic data, operation time, length of hospital stay, estimated blood loss and surgical complications were collected, and clinical outcomes were evaluated using the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale. Preoperative and postoperative cervical lordosis were measured.

Results: Postoperative AISA scores were significantly increased compared with that before surgery in both groups, there was no significant differences between groups. The intraoperative blood loss in the laminoplasty group was significantly less than that in the laminectomy group and there were no significant differences in operation time and length of hospital stay between the two groups. No significant difference was found in the incidence of overall surgical complications between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the cervical lordosis after surgery compared with that before surgery in both groups.

Conclusions: For patients suffering from cervical hyperextension injury combined with preexisting multilevel spinal stenosis, both cervical laminoplasty with selective unilateral pedicle screw fixation and laminectomy with bilateral lateral mass screw fixation could achieve satisfactory clinical outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种后路手术治疗颈椎过伸损伤合并多椎间孔狭窄症的效果:回顾性研究。
背景:颈椎过度伸展损伤(CHI)通常会导致中枢神经综合征和脊柱不稳定,通常会影响到已有脊柱退行性病变的老年人,因此需要通过手术干预来解决颈椎的压迫和稳定性问题。本研究比较了两种后路减压和固定手术治疗颈椎过度伸展损伤的临床效果,这些患者都患有原有的多水平椎管狭窄症:方法:将颈椎过伸损伤合并多级椎管狭窄的患者分为两组。他们分别接受了椎板成形术联合选择性单侧椎弓根螺钉固定术或椎板切除术联合双侧肿块螺钉固定术。收集包括人口统计学数据、手术时间、住院时间、估计失血量和手术并发症在内的临床记录,并使用美国脊柱损伤协会(ASIA)损伤量表评估临床结果。对术前和术后颈椎前凸进行了测量:结果:两组患者术后AISA评分均较术前明显升高,组间无明显差异。椎板成形术组术中失血量明显少于椎板切除术组,两组手术时间和住院时间无明显差异。两组的总体手术并发症发生率无明显差异。两组患者术后的颈椎前凸与术前相比无明显差异:结论:对于颈椎过伸损伤合并原有多椎间孔狭窄的患者,选择性单侧椎弓根螺钉固定的颈椎椎板成形术和双侧侧块螺钉固定的椎板切除术都能取得满意的临床效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
期刊最新文献
Associations between folate intake and knee pain, inflammation mediators and comorbid conditions in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Correction: Early versus delayed mobilization for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (small to large sized tear): a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Correlations of strength, proprioception, and dynamic balance to the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool Score among patients with chronic ankle instability: a cross-sectional study. Effects of two posterior procedures for treatment of cervical hyperextension injury with multilevel spinal stenosis: A retrospective study. The association of different types of stress, and stress accumulation with low back pain in call-center workers - a cross-sectional observational study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1