Transverse versus longitudinal skin incision in first extensor tendon release for radial styloid tenosynovitis: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1186/s12891-024-08037-1
Sitthiphong Suwannaphisit, Nipat Panichnantho, Warangkana Fongsri, Pormes Suwanno
{"title":"Transverse versus longitudinal skin incision in first extensor tendon release for radial styloid tenosynovitis: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Sitthiphong Suwannaphisit, Nipat Panichnantho, Warangkana Fongsri, Pormes Suwanno","doi":"10.1186/s12891-024-08037-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>De Quervain's tenosynovitis, characterized by the entrapment of the extensor pollicis brevis and abductor pollicis longus tendons in the first extensor compartment, leads to pain and swelling near the radial styloid. When conservative treatments including rest and antiinflammatory medications fail, surgery is often recommended. This study aimed to compare transverse and longitudinal skin incisions with respect to surgical scars, postoperative pain, and functional outcomes in the open release of the first extensor compartment in radial styloid tenosynovitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy patients were randomly assigned to either the transverse or longitudinal skin incision group using a computer-generated random number table. Postoperative scarring was assessed using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), pain intensity using a verbal numerical rating scale, and functional outcomes using the Thai version of the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) questionnaire at 2, 6, and 12 weeks post-surgery. Continuous data were presented as mean ± standard deviation for normally distributed data or as median (interquartile range) for skewed distributions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following surgery, both groups showed marked improvements in Thai PRWE and POSAS scores, with no differences in functional outcomes. The longitudinal incision group had significant pain reduction at 2 and 6 weeks post-surgery. By 12 weeks, pain alleviation was similar in both groups. Wound infection was not observed in any case, and three patients reported temporary paresthesia, which was not statistically significant between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both techniques demonstrate similar improvements in functional scores and reductions in pain scores, with no significant differences in complication rates, particularly concerning hypertrophic scars. The decision between transverse and longitudinal skin incisions should consider the surgeon's expertise, the patient's anatomical characteristics, and the complexity of the surgical procedure. Each approach presents distinct trade-offs, highlighting the necessity of a personalized, patient-centered strategy to optimize surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was registered on 27/06/2023, at clinicaltrials.in.th (TCTR20230627001). This study was retrospectively registered.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"25 1","pages":"969"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-08037-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: De Quervain's tenosynovitis, characterized by the entrapment of the extensor pollicis brevis and abductor pollicis longus tendons in the first extensor compartment, leads to pain and swelling near the radial styloid. When conservative treatments including rest and antiinflammatory medications fail, surgery is often recommended. This study aimed to compare transverse and longitudinal skin incisions with respect to surgical scars, postoperative pain, and functional outcomes in the open release of the first extensor compartment in radial styloid tenosynovitis.

Methods: Seventy patients were randomly assigned to either the transverse or longitudinal skin incision group using a computer-generated random number table. Postoperative scarring was assessed using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), pain intensity using a verbal numerical rating scale, and functional outcomes using the Thai version of the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) questionnaire at 2, 6, and 12 weeks post-surgery. Continuous data were presented as mean ± standard deviation for normally distributed data or as median (interquartile range) for skewed distributions.

Results: Following surgery, both groups showed marked improvements in Thai PRWE and POSAS scores, with no differences in functional outcomes. The longitudinal incision group had significant pain reduction at 2 and 6 weeks post-surgery. By 12 weeks, pain alleviation was similar in both groups. Wound infection was not observed in any case, and three patients reported temporary paresthesia, which was not statistically significant between the groups.

Conclusions: Both techniques demonstrate similar improvements in functional scores and reductions in pain scores, with no significant differences in complication rates, particularly concerning hypertrophic scars. The decision between transverse and longitudinal skin incisions should consider the surgeon's expertise, the patient's anatomical characteristics, and the complexity of the surgical procedure. Each approach presents distinct trade-offs, highlighting the necessity of a personalized, patient-centered strategy to optimize surgical outcomes.

Trial registration: The study was registered on 27/06/2023, at clinicaltrials.in.th (TCTR20230627001). This study was retrospectively registered.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
桡侧式腱鞘炎第一伸肌腱松解术中横向与纵向皮肤切口:随机对照试验。
背景:德-克尔万腱鞘炎的特点是伸拇肌和拇外展肌腱在第一伸肌腱间隙内卡住,会导致桡骨腕骨髁附近疼痛和肿胀。当包括休息和抗炎药物在内的保守治疗无效时,通常会建议进行手术治疗。本研究旨在比较横向和纵向皮肤切口在桡侧肩关节腱鞘炎患者第一伸肌室开放性松解术中的手术疤痕、术后疼痛和功能效果:使用计算机生成的随机数字表将 70 名患者随机分配到横向或纵向皮肤切口组。术后瘢痕采用患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表(POSAS)进行评估,疼痛强度采用口头数字评分量表进行评估,术后2周、6周和12周的功能结果采用泰语版患者评定腕关节评估(PRWE)问卷进行评估。对于正态分布数据,连续数据以均数±标准差表示;对于偏态分布数据,连续数据以中位数(四分位间距)表示:手术后,两组患者的泰式 PRWE 和 POSAS 评分均有明显改善,功能结果无差异。纵向切口组在术后 2 周和 6 周疼痛明显减轻。到 12 周时,两组的疼痛缓解情况相似。所有病例均未发现伤口感染,有三名患者报告出现暂时性麻痹,但两组间差异无统计学意义:结论:两种技术对功能评分和疼痛评分的改善相似,并发症发生率无明显差异,尤其是在增生性疤痕方面。在决定采用横向还是纵向皮肤切口时,应考虑外科医生的专业知识、患者的解剖特点以及手术的复杂程度。每种方法都有不同的利弊权衡,突出了以患者为中心的个性化策略对优化手术效果的必要性:该研究于 2023 年 6 月 27 日在 clinicaltrials.in.th 注册(TCTR20230627001)。本研究为回顾性注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
期刊最新文献
Associations between folate intake and knee pain, inflammation mediators and comorbid conditions in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Correction: Early versus delayed mobilization for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (small to large sized tear): a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Correlations of strength, proprioception, and dynamic balance to the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool Score among patients with chronic ankle instability: a cross-sectional study. Effects of two posterior procedures for treatment of cervical hyperextension injury with multilevel spinal stenosis: A retrospective study. The association of different types of stress, and stress accumulation with low back pain in call-center workers - a cross-sectional observational study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1