Feasibility of combined therapy: percutaneous left atrial appendage closure and transcatheter edge-to-edge repair.

IF 3.1 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1007/s12928-024-01065-7
Nobuyuki Fukuda, Teruhiko Imamura, Shuhei Tanaka, Naoya Kataoka, Ryuichi Ushijima, Hiroshi Ueno, Koichiro Kinugawa
{"title":"Feasibility of combined therapy: percutaneous left atrial appendage closure and transcatheter edge-to-edge repair.","authors":"Nobuyuki Fukuda, Teruhiko Imamura, Shuhei Tanaka, Naoya Kataoka, Ryuichi Ushijima, Hiroshi Ueno, Koichiro Kinugawa","doi":"10.1007/s12928-024-01065-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) often present with concomitant significant mitral regurgitation (MR). Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is indicated for patients with AF to prevent thromboembolism and reduce the need for long-term anticoagulation. Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) is recommended for patients with significant MR. However, the feasibility and efficacy of combining these therapeutic interventions remain uncertain. This study included consecutive patients who underwent LAAC. Feasibility was assessed by comparing outcomes between those undergoing combined LAAC + TEER and those receiving LAAC alone. Among 192 patients, 11 underwent the combined LAAC + TEER procedure, while 181 underwent LAAC alone. Procedural success was high in both groups (100% vs. 99%). At the 1-year follow-up, the incidence of significant device leak and device-related thrombus did not differ significantly between the groups (0% vs. 1.1% and 0% vs. 6.7%, respectively; p > 0.05 for both). Additionally, the cumulative incidence of thromboembolic and bleeding events was comparable between the two groups (thromboembolic p = 0.57 and bleeding p = 0.42). The combination of LAAC + TEER may be a feasible and effective therapeutic strategy when performed in carefully selected patients at high-volume, experienced centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":9439,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-024-01065-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) often present with concomitant significant mitral regurgitation (MR). Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is indicated for patients with AF to prevent thromboembolism and reduce the need for long-term anticoagulation. Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) is recommended for patients with significant MR. However, the feasibility and efficacy of combining these therapeutic interventions remain uncertain. This study included consecutive patients who underwent LAAC. Feasibility was assessed by comparing outcomes between those undergoing combined LAAC + TEER and those receiving LAAC alone. Among 192 patients, 11 underwent the combined LAAC + TEER procedure, while 181 underwent LAAC alone. Procedural success was high in both groups (100% vs. 99%). At the 1-year follow-up, the incidence of significant device leak and device-related thrombus did not differ significantly between the groups (0% vs. 1.1% and 0% vs. 6.7%, respectively; p > 0.05 for both). Additionally, the cumulative incidence of thromboembolic and bleeding events was comparable between the two groups (thromboembolic p = 0.57 and bleeding p = 0.42). The combination of LAAC + TEER may be a feasible and effective therapeutic strategy when performed in carefully selected patients at high-volume, experienced centers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
联合疗法的可行性:经皮左心房阑尾闭合术和经导管边缘到边缘修补术。
心房颤动(房颤)患者通常伴有严重的二尖瓣反流(MR)。经皮左心房阑尾关闭术(LAAC)适用于心房颤动患者,可预防血栓栓塞并减少长期抗凝的需要。对于有明显 MR 的患者,建议采用经导管边缘到边缘修补术(TEER)。然而,结合这些治疗干预措施的可行性和疗效仍不确定。本研究纳入了接受 LAAC 的连续患者。通过比较联合 LAAC + TEER 与单独接受 LAAC 的患者的疗效来评估可行性。在192名患者中,11人接受了LAAC+TEER联合手术,181人接受了单纯LAAC手术。两组患者的手术成功率都很高(100% 对 99%)。在 1 年的随访中,两组患者明显的器械泄漏和器械相关血栓发生率没有显著差异(分别为 0% vs. 1.1% 和 0% vs. 6.7%;P 均大于 0.05)。此外,两组血栓栓塞和出血事件的累积发生率相当(血栓栓塞 p = 0.57,出血 p = 0.42)。LAAC+TEER联合疗法可能是一种可行且有效的治疗策略,但必须在高容量、经验丰富的中心对经过仔细筛选的患者进行治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT) is an international journal covering the field of cardiovascular disease and includes cardiac (coronary and noncoronary) and peripheral interventions and therapeutics. Articles are subject to peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability. CVIT is an official journal of The Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.
期刊最新文献
Availability of transcatheter aortic valve implantation across hospitals and differences in strategies and clinical outcomes in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Feasibility of combined therapy: percutaneous left atrial appendage closure and transcatheter edge-to-edge repair. 3D printing-enhanced transcatheter closure of residual shunts post-ventricular septal perforation: multimodal imaging's crucial role. Physician attending cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for early aortic structural valve deterioration: non-invasive method to identify the regurgitate location. Efficacy of R-N cusp-overlap view as a complementary approach for optimal neocommissural alignment with Navitor valve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1