{"title":"Bispecific antibodies in clinical practice: Understanding recent advances and current place in cancer treatment landscape.","authors":"Vaibhav Verma, Geeti Sharma","doi":"10.1007/s10238-024-01520-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Immunotherapy has changed the treatment landscape of cancer in the past decade. Amongst various forms of immunotherapy, manipulating the T cell has shown promise in past few years. T cell manipulation can be done by CAR-T cell therapy or bispecific antibodies. These 2 therapeutic modalities have been studied and shown efficacy in hematologic malignancies in relapsed refractory setting. They have not been compared to each other in randomized control trials; hence, the adequate sequencing is not known. Although cross-trial comparison is not ideal, available evidence indicates toward similar efficacy and better tolerability of BiTEs compared to CAR-T cell therapy. Bispecific antibodies, though, have an advantage of being able to be used in an \"off the shelf\" manner considering these are not MHC specific and can be administered to all patients regardless of HLA type. There has been an explosive growth in the indications for bispecific antibodies in the recent past. In this article, we have reviewed recent approvals, indication and literature regarding efficacy and adverse effects of bispecific antibodies in all available indications. This will be a useful read for clinical practitioners to understand the mechanism of action and place of all available bispecific antibodies in the current oncology landscape.</p>","PeriodicalId":10337,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-024-01520-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Immunotherapy has changed the treatment landscape of cancer in the past decade. Amongst various forms of immunotherapy, manipulating the T cell has shown promise in past few years. T cell manipulation can be done by CAR-T cell therapy or bispecific antibodies. These 2 therapeutic modalities have been studied and shown efficacy in hematologic malignancies in relapsed refractory setting. They have not been compared to each other in randomized control trials; hence, the adequate sequencing is not known. Although cross-trial comparison is not ideal, available evidence indicates toward similar efficacy and better tolerability of BiTEs compared to CAR-T cell therapy. Bispecific antibodies, though, have an advantage of being able to be used in an "off the shelf" manner considering these are not MHC specific and can be administered to all patients regardless of HLA type. There has been an explosive growth in the indications for bispecific antibodies in the recent past. In this article, we have reviewed recent approvals, indication and literature regarding efficacy and adverse effects of bispecific antibodies in all available indications. This will be a useful read for clinical practitioners to understand the mechanism of action and place of all available bispecific antibodies in the current oncology landscape.
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Experimental Medicine (CEM) is a multidisciplinary journal that aims to be a forum of scientific excellence and information exchange in relation to the basic and clinical features of the following fields: hematology, onco-hematology, oncology, virology, immunology, and rheumatology. The journal publishes reviews and editorials, experimental and preclinical studies, translational research, prospectively designed clinical trials, and epidemiological studies. Papers containing new clinical or experimental data that are likely to contribute to changes in clinical practice or the way in which a disease is thought about will be given priority due to their immediate importance. Case reports will be accepted on an exceptional basis only, and their submission is discouraged. The major criteria for publication are clarity, scientific soundness, and advances in knowledge. In compliance with the overwhelmingly prevailing request by the international scientific community, and with respect for eco-compatibility issues, CEM is now published exclusively online.