Embracing Complexity: Developing a Framework for Evaluating a Multi-Faceted Training and Technical Assistance System.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Evaluation & the Health Professions Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1177/01632787241269069
Ayana R Stanley, Calla Jamison, Alice Chen, Lindsey Barranco, Delaney Welsh, Katie Jones
{"title":"Embracing Complexity: Developing a Framework for Evaluating a Multi-Faceted Training and Technical Assistance System.","authors":"Ayana R Stanley, Calla Jamison, Alice Chen, Lindsey Barranco, Delaney Welsh, Katie Jones","doi":"10.1177/01632787241269069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The benefits of training and technical assistance (TTA) have been well documented. There is limited literature that explores how complex systems of TTA are implemented and evaluated particularly in the violence prevention field. The Violence Prevention Practice and Translation Branch (VPPTB) within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Division of Violence Prevention funds multiple technical assistance providers who are tasked with building the capacity of program recipients to implement comprehensive approaches to prevent multiple forms of violence. VPPTB designed the Violence Prevention Technical Assistance Center (VPTAC) with the goal of implementing and evaluating comprehensive TTA efforts that integrates the work of multiple TTA providers to build the capacity of recipients to plan, implement, and evaluate violence prevention efforts. The VPTAC evaluation incorporates data from program recipients, TTA providers, and TTA modalities enabling the VPPTB staff to show improvement in technical knowledge, gather examples of enhanced implementation, and facilitate proactive TTA planning. An important step in the process of evaluating VPTAC from a system-level perspective required an expansion beyond evaluating a single TTA event, provider, or engagement. This is essential to understand how a diverse set of TTA activities and partners work together in their efforts to build capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":12315,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","volume":"47 4","pages":"437-445"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11686402/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01632787241269069","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The benefits of training and technical assistance (TTA) have been well documented. There is limited literature that explores how complex systems of TTA are implemented and evaluated particularly in the violence prevention field. The Violence Prevention Practice and Translation Branch (VPPTB) within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Division of Violence Prevention funds multiple technical assistance providers who are tasked with building the capacity of program recipients to implement comprehensive approaches to prevent multiple forms of violence. VPPTB designed the Violence Prevention Technical Assistance Center (VPTAC) with the goal of implementing and evaluating comprehensive TTA efforts that integrates the work of multiple TTA providers to build the capacity of recipients to plan, implement, and evaluate violence prevention efforts. The VPTAC evaluation incorporates data from program recipients, TTA providers, and TTA modalities enabling the VPPTB staff to show improvement in technical knowledge, gather examples of enhanced implementation, and facilitate proactive TTA planning. An important step in the process of evaluating VPTAC from a system-level perspective required an expansion beyond evaluating a single TTA event, provider, or engagement. This is essential to understand how a diverse set of TTA activities and partners work together in their efforts to build capacity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拥抱复杂性:制定评估多方面培训和技术援助系统的框架。
培训和技术援助(TTA)的益处已得到充分证实。但探讨如何实施和评估复杂的培训和技术援助系统(TTA),尤其是在暴力预防领域如何实施和评估的文献却很有限。美国疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)暴力预防部的暴力预防实践和转化处(VPPTB)为多个技术援助提供者提供资金,这些技术援助提供者的任务是提高计划接受者实施综合方法预防多种形式暴力的能力。VPPTB 设计了暴力预防技术援助中心 (VPTAC),其目标是实施和评估全面的技术援助工作,将多个技术援助提供者的工作整合起来,培养受援者规划、实施和评估暴力预防工作的能力。VPTAC 评估纳入了来自计划接受者、技术援助提供者和技术援助模式的数据,使 VPPTB 工作人员能够展示技术知识的改进,收集加强实施的实例,并促进积极主动的技术援助规划。在从系统层面评估 VPTAC 的过程中,有一个重要步骤要求将评估范围扩大到单个 TTA 活动、提供者或参与之外。这对于了解一系列不同的 TTA 活动和合作伙伴如何共同开展能力建设工作至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Evaluation & the Health Professions is a peer-reviewed, quarterly journal that provides health-related professionals with state-of-the-art methodological, measurement, and statistical tools for conceptualizing the etiology of health promotion and problems, and developing, implementing, and evaluating health programs, teaching and training services, and products that pertain to a myriad of health dimensions. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 31 days
期刊最新文献
Reliability and Validity of Turkish Translation of the Questionnaire of Physiotherapeutic Specific Exercises of Scoliosis (QPSSE): A Brief Report. The Dual Effect of Work Rumination in the Relationship Between Challenge Stress and Innovative Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model of Information Literacy. Acknowledgement of Reviewers for 2024. Commentary: Review of Mandatory Maintenance of Certification in the USA. Analyzing the Effects of a Repeated Reading Intervention on Reading Fluency With Generalized Linear Mixed Models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1