Elizabeth E Odil, Katelyn R Ward, Ryan T Davis, Jordan M Reilly, Fionna Sun, Heba Elassar, Morta Lapkus, Jacquelyn Pastewski, Diane M Studzinski, Rose E Callahan, Peter F Czako, Sapna Nagar
{"title":"Radioactive iodine therapy dose impact on recurrence and survival in N1 papillary thyroid cancer.","authors":"Elizabeth E Odil, Katelyn R Ward, Ryan T Davis, Jordan M Reilly, Fionna Sun, Heba Elassar, Morta Lapkus, Jacquelyn Pastewski, Diane M Studzinski, Rose E Callahan, Peter F Czako, Sapna Nagar","doi":"10.1097/MNM.0000000000001936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to investigate radioactive iodine therapy (RAIT) dose impact on survival and recurrence in patients with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) with regional lymph node metastasis (N1).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of PTC patients with N1 disease from 2007 to 2011 at a tertiary academic hospital collected demographics, tumor characteristics, and RAIT treatment dose. RAIT dose was stratified by total dosage less than or greater than 150 mCi. Outcomes included recurrence, immediate RAIT side-effects, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 60 N1a and 21 N1b patients were studied with a median follow-up of about 9 years. No statistically significant differences were found between N1a PTC patients who received high-dose vs low-dose RAIT in recurrence rate (6.9% vs 6.7%, P > 0.999) or immediate RAIT side effects (6.9% vs 16.1%, P = 0.426). There were no mortalities in the N1a group. For patients with N1b PTC, there were no differences between high-dose and low-dose RAIT in recurrence rate (41.7% vs 44.4%, P > 0.999), mortality (0% vs 16.7%, P = 0.375), or immediate RAIT side effects (8.3% vs 11.1%, P > 0.999).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dosages of RAIT ≥ 150 mCi do not appear to provide additional benefit in reducing recurrence compared to doses <150 mCi for N1a or N1b PTC patients. No differences in mortality or immediate RAIT side effects were observed between the two dosing regimens; however, interpretation is limited by low event rates. Large randomized trials are needed for further individualized recommendations regarding optimal RAIT dosage in N1 PTC.</p>","PeriodicalId":19708,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","volume":" ","pages":"113-119"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001936","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study is to investigate radioactive iodine therapy (RAIT) dose impact on survival and recurrence in patients with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) with regional lymph node metastasis (N1).
Methods: A retrospective study of PTC patients with N1 disease from 2007 to 2011 at a tertiary academic hospital collected demographics, tumor characteristics, and RAIT treatment dose. RAIT dose was stratified by total dosage less than or greater than 150 mCi. Outcomes included recurrence, immediate RAIT side-effects, and mortality.
Results: A total of 60 N1a and 21 N1b patients were studied with a median follow-up of about 9 years. No statistically significant differences were found between N1a PTC patients who received high-dose vs low-dose RAIT in recurrence rate (6.9% vs 6.7%, P > 0.999) or immediate RAIT side effects (6.9% vs 16.1%, P = 0.426). There were no mortalities in the N1a group. For patients with N1b PTC, there were no differences between high-dose and low-dose RAIT in recurrence rate (41.7% vs 44.4%, P > 0.999), mortality (0% vs 16.7%, P = 0.375), or immediate RAIT side effects (8.3% vs 11.1%, P > 0.999).
Conclusion: Dosages of RAIT ≥ 150 mCi do not appear to provide additional benefit in reducing recurrence compared to doses <150 mCi for N1a or N1b PTC patients. No differences in mortality or immediate RAIT side effects were observed between the two dosing regimens; however, interpretation is limited by low event rates. Large randomized trials are needed for further individualized recommendations regarding optimal RAIT dosage in N1 PTC.
期刊介绍:
Nuclear Medicine Communications, the official journal of the British Nuclear Medicine Society, is a rapid communications journal covering nuclear medicine and molecular imaging with radionuclides, and the basic supporting sciences. As well as clinical research and commentary, manuscripts describing research on preclinical and basic sciences (radiochemistry, radiopharmacy, radiobiology, radiopharmacology, medical physics, computing and engineering, and technical and nursing professions involved in delivering nuclear medicine services) are welcomed, as the journal is intended to be of interest internationally to all members of the many medical and non-medical disciplines involved in nuclear medicine. In addition to papers reporting original studies, frankly written editorials and topical reviews are a regular feature of the journal.