Biomechanical corneal effects of LASIK Xtra compared with conventional FS-LASIK in high myopic eyes.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of cataract and refractive surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001566
Klemens Paul Kaiser, Marvin Lucas Biller, Tyll Jandewerth, Petra Davidova, Eva Hemkeppler, Christoph Lwowski, Myriam Böhm, Thomas Kohnen
{"title":"Biomechanical corneal effects of LASIK Xtra compared with conventional FS-LASIK in high myopic eyes.","authors":"Klemens Paul Kaiser, Marvin Lucas Biller, Tyll Jandewerth, Petra Davidova, Eva Hemkeppler, Christoph Lwowski, Myriam Böhm, Thomas Kohnen","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the in vivo corneal biomechanical response to FS-LASIK combined with accelerated corneal crosslinking (LASIK Xtra) compared with conventional FS-LASIK (convLASIK) in highly myopic eyes.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, randomized fellow eye-controlled clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who received treatment with LASIK Xtra (30mW/cm 2 , 90 seconds with continuous UV-A) in 1 eye and convLASIK in the other eye were enrolled. Both eyes were subjected preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively to a Corvis ST examination. The stiffness parameter at first applanation (SP-A1), integrated inverse radius (IIR), deformation amplitude (DA), deformation amplitude 2 mm away from apex, and the apical deformation (DARatio2mm) were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 38 high myopic eyes (-7.34 ± 1.02 diopters) of 19 patients. The results of the corneal biomechanical measurement showed a significant reduction in overall corneal stiffness with a significant decrease in postoperative SP-A1 and increase in IIR, DA, and DARatio2mm ( P < .001). In a direct comparison, there was no evidence of an increase in corneal stiffness in the LASIK Xtra group compared with the convLASIK group 12 months postoperatively. No statistically significant difference was detected in any of the 4 biomechanical parameters ( P > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The corneal biomechanical response to convLASIK and LASIK Xtra did not vary significantly. With a similar corneal thickness loss, there was no significant difference in the 4 biomechanical metrics between the convLASIK and LASIK Xtra groups. Thus, LASIK Xtra appeared not to have a protective corneal stiffening effect compared with convLASIK 12 months postoperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":"106-112"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001566","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the in vivo corneal biomechanical response to FS-LASIK combined with accelerated corneal crosslinking (LASIK Xtra) compared with conventional FS-LASIK (convLASIK) in highly myopic eyes.

Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Design: Prospective, randomized fellow eye-controlled clinical trial.

Methods: Patients who received treatment with LASIK Xtra (30mW/cm 2 , 90 seconds with continuous UV-A) in 1 eye and convLASIK in the other eye were enrolled. Both eyes were subjected preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively to a Corvis ST examination. The stiffness parameter at first applanation (SP-A1), integrated inverse radius (IIR), deformation amplitude (DA), deformation amplitude 2 mm away from apex, and the apical deformation (DARatio2mm) were evaluated.

Results: The study included 38 high myopic eyes (-7.34 ± 1.02 diopters) of 19 patients. The results of the corneal biomechanical measurement showed a significant reduction in overall corneal stiffness with a significant decrease in postoperative SP-A1 and increase in IIR, DA, and DARatio2mm ( P < .001). In a direct comparison, there was no evidence of an increase in corneal stiffness in the LASIK Xtra group compared with the convLASIK group 12 months postoperatively. No statistically significant difference was detected in any of the 4 biomechanical parameters ( P > .05).

Conclusions: The corneal biomechanical response to convLASIK and LASIK Xtra did not vary significantly. With a similar corneal thickness loss, there was no significant difference in the 4 biomechanical metrics between the convLASIK and LASIK Xtra groups. Thus, LASIK Xtra appeared not to have a protective corneal stiffening effect compared with convLASIK 12 months postoperatively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
LASIK-Xtra 与传统 Femto-LASIK 相比对高度近视眼角膜生物力学的影响。
目的:本研究旨在探讨飞秒激光辅助原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)结合加速角膜交联术(LASIK-Xtra)与传统的飞秒激光辅助原位角膜磨镶术(convLASIK)相比,高度近视眼的体内角膜生物力学反应:地点:德国法兰克福歌德大学眼科系:设计:前瞻性、随机研究员眼对照临床试验:我们招募了单眼接受 LASIK-Xtra 治疗(30mW/cm2,90 秒连续 UVA)和双眼接受 convLASIK 治疗的患者。术前和术后 12 个月,双眼均接受了 Corvis ST 检查。对第一次角膜塑形时的硬度参数(SP-A1)、综合反比半径(IIR)、变形幅度(DA)、距角膜顶 2 毫米处的变形幅度和角膜顶变形(DARatio2 毫米)进行了评估:研究包括 19 名患者的 38 只高度近视眼(-7.34±1.02 屈光度)。角膜生物力学测量结果显示,整体角膜硬度显著降低,术后SP-A1显著降低,IIR、DA和DARatio2mm增加(P.05):结论:角膜生物力学对 convLASIK 和 LASIK-Xtra 的反应差异不大。在角膜厚度损失相似的情况下,convLASIK 组和 LASIK-Xtra 组在四项生物力学指标上没有明显差异。因此,与术后12个月的convLASIK相比,LASIK-Xtra似乎没有保护角膜僵化的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
8.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.
期刊最新文献
Use of intracameral antibiotics prophylaxis in patients with posterior capsular rupture during cataract surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Three-year comparison of two mix-and-match strategies: enhanced monofocal and trifocal vs enhanced monofocal and trifocal EDOF intraocular lenses. Viscodilation of Schlemm canal and trabeculotomy for reducing intraocular pressure and medication use in pseudophakic eyes. Prospective randomized control trial measuring posterior capsular opacification rates and visual outcomes following insertion of two monofocal intraocular lenses: the hydrophobic RayOne 800C and the hydrophilic RayOne 600C: 12-month results. Database evaluation of complication rates and visual outcomes of cataract surgery performed by trainees vs independent surgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1