Evaluating the 7-day barrier: early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystitis with prolonged symptom duration; a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Max H G van Maasakkers, Teus J Weijs, Oscar P Cnossen, Willemieke G van Braak, Johannes C Kelder, Didier Roulin, Djamila Boerma
{"title":"Evaluating the 7-day barrier: early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystitis with prolonged symptom duration; a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Max H G van Maasakkers, Teus J Weijs, Oscar P Cnossen, Willemieke G van Braak, Johannes C Kelder, Didier Roulin, Djamila Boerma","doi":"10.1007/s00423-024-03555-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The gold standard for treating acute cholecystitis is an early laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, whether this still applies for a > 7-day existing cholecystitis remains heavily debated. Therefore, this systematic review investigates the safety of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for a > 7-day existing cholecystitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed and Embase were systematically searched for all studies comparing early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with 0-7 versus > 7-day existing cholecystitis at time of surgery. Meta-analyses were performed on dichotomous and continuous outcomes with risk difference (RD) and mean difference (MD) as measures of effect.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3007 studies were screened, resulting in the inclusion of 13 non-randomised studies comprising 5481 patients. Of these, 4690 received cholecystectomy within 7 days, and 791 after 7 days. Operating times (MD -11.8 min; 95% CI [-18.4; -5.2]) and total hospital stay (MD -2.7 days; 95% CI [-4.0; -1.4]) were longer in the > 7-day group. However, no significant risk difference was found for combined major complications: bile duct injury/leakage and bowel injury (RD -1.0%; 95% CI [-2.3; 0.3]), for complications graded Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3 (RD -0.3%; 95% CI [-2.5; 1.9]), or for conversions (RD -1.5%; 95% CI [-3.9; 0.9]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystitis after the 7-day barrier might be harder, as reflected by longer operating times. However, a significant increase in complications or conversions was not found. Due to the risk of bias and lack of well-powered studies directly comparing early cholecystectomy after 7 days with alternative strategies, strong recommendations cannot be made. Meanwhile, it is advised to carefully weigh the treatment options in case of a > 7-day existing cholecystitis, based on patient's characteristics and surgeon's experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"409 1","pages":"366"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-024-03555-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The gold standard for treating acute cholecystitis is an early laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, whether this still applies for a > 7-day existing cholecystitis remains heavily debated. Therefore, this systematic review investigates the safety of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for a > 7-day existing cholecystitis.
Methods: PubMed and Embase were systematically searched for all studies comparing early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with 0-7 versus > 7-day existing cholecystitis at time of surgery. Meta-analyses were performed on dichotomous and continuous outcomes with risk difference (RD) and mean difference (MD) as measures of effect.
Results: A total of 3007 studies were screened, resulting in the inclusion of 13 non-randomised studies comprising 5481 patients. Of these, 4690 received cholecystectomy within 7 days, and 791 after 7 days. Operating times (MD -11.8 min; 95% CI [-18.4; -5.2]) and total hospital stay (MD -2.7 days; 95% CI [-4.0; -1.4]) were longer in the > 7-day group. However, no significant risk difference was found for combined major complications: bile duct injury/leakage and bowel injury (RD -1.0%; 95% CI [-2.3; 0.3]), for complications graded Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3 (RD -0.3%; 95% CI [-2.5; 1.9]), or for conversions (RD -1.5%; 95% CI [-3.9; 0.9]).
Conclusion: Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystitis after the 7-day barrier might be harder, as reflected by longer operating times. However, a significant increase in complications or conversions was not found. Due to the risk of bias and lack of well-powered studies directly comparing early cholecystectomy after 7 days with alternative strategies, strong recommendations cannot be made. Meanwhile, it is advised to carefully weigh the treatment options in case of a > 7-day existing cholecystitis, based on patient's characteristics and surgeon's experience.
期刊介绍：
Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
