The Application of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Endpoints in Clinical Research: Analysis of Trends and Review of Challenges.

IF 4.1 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1177/19322968241301800
Andrew Bevan, Graham Ellis, Mona Eskandarian, Davide Garrisi
{"title":"The Application of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Endpoints in Clinical Research: Analysis of Trends and Review of Challenges.","authors":"Andrew Bevan, Graham Ellis, Mona Eskandarian, Davide Garrisi","doi":"10.1177/19322968241301800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Considerable efforts to standardize continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) have occurred in recent years. The aim was to perform an analysis of clinical studies in clinicaltrials.gov to evaluate trends in CGM endpoint adoption.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov was searched for studies of drugs, devices and combination products containing CGM terms posted from 2012 to 2023. 1269 studies were returned and 954 were excluded. 315 studies were divided into two periods (P1 [2012-2017] and P2 [2018-2023]) and differences analyzed using descriptive statistics and two-tailed <i>t</i> tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant 60.3% increase in total clinical studies from P1 (121) to P2 (194). Phase 2 and Phase 3 Studies both saw significant increases of 125.8 and 169.2%, respectively, in P2. Adult-only studies predominated in both periods, with a 40.4% increase in P2. Studies that included pediatric populations, although smaller in number, increased significantly. Most studies were nonindustry-funded, and studies in this category saw a significant 80.0% increase in P2. However, industry-only funded studies also increased significantly by 78.4% in P2 in the same period. Studies of type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes (T2DM) increased by 55.8% and 26.9%, respectively, but increases were not statistically significant. Studies of nondiabetes-related indications did increase significantly (233.3%). 27.6% of studies used CGM-derived metrics as primary endpoints (PE). Studies that used time in range (TIR) increased by 222.4% in P2, which was significant. Conversely studies that used mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) decreased significantly by 71.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data provide evidence of significant increases in the application of CGM endpoints in clinical studies in the last six years, including studies with TIR as the PE. Increases have been driven largely by academia, but our data show that industry is starting to follow suit. The significant increase in studies that included pediatrics is encouraging.</p>","PeriodicalId":15475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"19322968241301800"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968241301800","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Considerable efforts to standardize continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) have occurred in recent years. The aim was to perform an analysis of clinical studies in clinicaltrials.gov to evaluate trends in CGM endpoint adoption.

Methods: Clinicaltrials.gov was searched for studies of drugs, devices and combination products containing CGM terms posted from 2012 to 2023. 1269 studies were returned and 954 were excluded. 315 studies were divided into two periods (P1 [2012-2017] and P2 [2018-2023]) and differences analyzed using descriptive statistics and two-tailed t tests.

Results: There was a significant 60.3% increase in total clinical studies from P1 (121) to P2 (194). Phase 2 and Phase 3 Studies both saw significant increases of 125.8 and 169.2%, respectively, in P2. Adult-only studies predominated in both periods, with a 40.4% increase in P2. Studies that included pediatric populations, although smaller in number, increased significantly. Most studies were nonindustry-funded, and studies in this category saw a significant 80.0% increase in P2. However, industry-only funded studies also increased significantly by 78.4% in P2 in the same period. Studies of type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes (T2DM) increased by 55.8% and 26.9%, respectively, but increases were not statistically significant. Studies of nondiabetes-related indications did increase significantly (233.3%). 27.6% of studies used CGM-derived metrics as primary endpoints (PE). Studies that used time in range (TIR) increased by 222.4% in P2, which was significant. Conversely studies that used mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) decreased significantly by 71.3%.

Conclusion: Our data provide evidence of significant increases in the application of CGM endpoints in clinical studies in the last six years, including studies with TIR as the PE. Increases have been driven largely by academia, but our data show that industry is starting to follow suit. The significant increase in studies that included pediatrics is encouraging.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
连续血糖监测终点在临床研究中的应用:趋势分析与挑战回顾。
导言:近年来,为实现连续血糖监测(CGM)标准化做出了巨大努力。我们的目的是对 clinicaltrials.gov 中的临床研究进行分析,以评估 CGM 终点采用的趋势:在 Clinicaltrials.gov 中搜索了 2012 年至 2023 年间发布的包含 CGM 术语的药物、设备和组合产品的研究。共检索到 1269 项研究,其中 954 项被排除。315 项研究被分为两个时期(P1 [2012-2017] 和 P2 [2018-2023]),并使用描述性统计和双尾 t 检验分析差异:从 P1(121 项)到 P2(194 项),临床研究总数大幅增加了 60.3%。第 2 期和第 3 期研究在 P2 期分别大幅增加了 125.8% 和 169.2%。这两个阶段的研究均以成人研究为主,P2 增加了 40.4%。包含儿科人群的研究虽然数量较少,但也大幅增加。大多数研究都是非行业资助的,这类研究的 P2 显著增加了 80.0%。不过,仅由行业资助的研究在同期的 P2 也大幅增加了 78.4%。有关 1 型糖尿病 (T1DM) 和 2 型糖尿病 (T2DM) 的研究分别增加了 55.8% 和 26.9%,但增幅在统计学上并不显著。非糖尿病相关适应症的研究确实大幅增加(233.3%)。27.6%的研究将 CGM 衍生指标作为主要终点(PE)。使用范围内时间(TIR)的研究在 P2 中增加了 222.4%,增幅显著。相反,使用血糖偏移平均幅度(MAGE)的研究则显著减少了 71.3%:我们的数据证明,在过去六年中,临床研究中应用 CGM 终点的情况显著增加,包括以 TIR 作为 PE 的研究。这一增长主要是由学术界推动的,但我们的数据显示,工业界也开始效仿。儿科研究的大幅增加令人鼓舞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: The Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (JDST) is a bi-monthly, peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the Diabetes Technology Society. JDST covers scientific and clinical aspects of diabetes technology including glucose monitoring, insulin and metabolic peptide delivery, the artificial pancreas, digital health, precision medicine, social media, cybersecurity, software for modeling, physiologic monitoring, technology for managing obesity, and diagnostic tests of glycation. The journal also covers the development and use of mobile applications and wireless communication, as well as bioengineered tools such as MEMS, new biomaterials, and nanotechnology to develop new sensors. Articles in JDST cover both basic research and clinical applications of technologies being developed to help people with diabetes.
期刊最新文献
The Application of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Endpoints in Clinical Research: Analysis of Trends and Review of Challenges. Glycemic and Patient-Reported Outcomes for Users of a New, Compact Automated Insulin Delivery System: A First Report. Artificial Intelligence to Diagnose Complications of Diabetes. Is Continuous Glucose Monitoring Feasible in Tribal India? Navigating the Benefits and Overcoming the Challenges. Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Derived Glycemic Phenotyping of Childhood Hypoglycemia due to Hyperinsulinism: A Year-long Prospective Nationwide Observational Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1