Differential Ultrasound Rates Mirror Sex Disparities in Thyroid Cancer.

IF 5.8 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Thyroid Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1089/thy.2024.0344
Sara Fernandes-Taylor, Erin J Aiello Bowles, Manasa Venkatesh, Rachael Doud, Craig Krebsbach, Natalia Arroyo, Bret Hanlon, Amy Y Chen, Louise Davies, David O Francis
{"title":"Differential Ultrasound Rates Mirror Sex Disparities in Thyroid Cancer.","authors":"Sara Fernandes-Taylor, Erin J Aiello Bowles, Manasa Venkatesh, Rachael Doud, Craig Krebsbach, Natalia Arroyo, Bret Hanlon, Amy Y Chen, Louise Davies, David O Francis","doi":"10.1089/thy.2024.0344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Expanding ultrasound use has increased the detection of thyroid cancer. Incidence has always been higher among females, a disparity that has grown over time. The sex difference in thyroid cancer is understudied in the context of diagnostic testing, particularly among privately insured adults in whom thyroid cancer is most common. We evaluated the association between thyroid ultrasound, fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB), and cancer incidence by sex in a large, integrated health system. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This longitudinal retrospective cohort study included Kaiser Permanente of Washington enrollees aged 18 and over who underwent thyroid ultrasound from 1997 to 2019. Data included electronic billing claims for patients linked to tumor registry diagnoses. We estimated (1) annual overall ultrasound, FNAB, and cancer incidence rates; (2) the proportion of ultrasound requiring FNAB; and (3) cancer diagnoses per FNAB. A Poisson model with offset determined the relationship between sex and the proportion of ultrasound requiring FNAB adjusting for patient and sociodemographic characteristics. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 33,589 patients underwent ultrasound (78% females; mean age 56). Ultrasound rates per 100,000 covered lives, defined as insured individuals per year, increased five-fold among males (111.11-490.97) and >four-fold among females (382.27-1331.14) between 1997 and 2019. FNAB rates also increased over time (rates per 100,000: 174.09-430.37 in females vs. 58.38-189.13 in men). Overall, FNAB rates per ultrasound changed little over time, and FNAB per ultrasound was greater in males compared with females (Adj rate ratio = 1.06 [confidence interval 1.01-1.11]). Cancer incidence was higher in females over the study period, but cancer incidence per FNAB was similar between sexes (both 0.06, <i>p</i> = 0.4). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Sex disparities in thyroid ultrasound rates are stark and are a likely driver of sex disparities in thyroid cancer incidence. Interestingly, ultrasound-triggered FNAB was more common in males and changed little over time, challenging the prevailing understanding that females have much higher rates of thyroid cancer. Although the population-based differences between sexes for FNAB and cancer were large, the differences among people who had ultrasound were small.</p>","PeriodicalId":23016,"journal":{"name":"Thyroid","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thyroid","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2024.0344","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Expanding ultrasound use has increased the detection of thyroid cancer. Incidence has always been higher among females, a disparity that has grown over time. The sex difference in thyroid cancer is understudied in the context of diagnostic testing, particularly among privately insured adults in whom thyroid cancer is most common. We evaluated the association between thyroid ultrasound, fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB), and cancer incidence by sex in a large, integrated health system. Methods: This longitudinal retrospective cohort study included Kaiser Permanente of Washington enrollees aged 18 and over who underwent thyroid ultrasound from 1997 to 2019. Data included electronic billing claims for patients linked to tumor registry diagnoses. We estimated (1) annual overall ultrasound, FNAB, and cancer incidence rates; (2) the proportion of ultrasound requiring FNAB; and (3) cancer diagnoses per FNAB. A Poisson model with offset determined the relationship between sex and the proportion of ultrasound requiring FNAB adjusting for patient and sociodemographic characteristics. Results: A total of 33,589 patients underwent ultrasound (78% females; mean age 56). Ultrasound rates per 100,000 covered lives, defined as insured individuals per year, increased five-fold among males (111.11-490.97) and >four-fold among females (382.27-1331.14) between 1997 and 2019. FNAB rates also increased over time (rates per 100,000: 174.09-430.37 in females vs. 58.38-189.13 in men). Overall, FNAB rates per ultrasound changed little over time, and FNAB per ultrasound was greater in males compared with females (Adj rate ratio = 1.06 [confidence interval 1.01-1.11]). Cancer incidence was higher in females over the study period, but cancer incidence per FNAB was similar between sexes (both 0.06, p = 0.4). Conclusions: Sex disparities in thyroid ultrasound rates are stark and are a likely driver of sex disparities in thyroid cancer incidence. Interestingly, ultrasound-triggered FNAB was more common in males and changed little over time, challenging the prevailing understanding that females have much higher rates of thyroid cancer. Although the population-based differences between sexes for FNAB and cancer were large, the differences among people who had ultrasound were small.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声波检查率的差异反映了甲状腺癌的性别差异。
背景:超声波应用的扩大提高了甲状腺癌的检出率。女性的发病率一直较高,这种差异随着时间的推移不断扩大。在诊断检测方面,对甲状腺癌的性别差异研究不足,尤其是在私人投保的成年人中,而甲状腺癌在这些人中最为常见。我们在一个大型综合医疗系统中评估了甲状腺超声、细针穿刺活检(FNAB)与癌症发病率之间的性别关联。方法:这项纵向回顾性队列研究纳入了华盛顿州 Kaiser Permanente 在 1997 年至 2019 年期间接受甲状腺超声检查的 18 岁及以上参保者。数据包括与肿瘤登记诊断相关联的患者电子账单索赔。我们估算了(1)年度总体超声检查、FNAB 和癌症发病率;(2)需要进行 FNAB 的超声检查比例;以及(3)每次 FNAB 的癌症诊断率。一个带有偏移的泊松模型确定了性别与需要进行 FNAB 的超声检查比例之间的关系,并对患者和社会人口特征进行了调整。研究结果共有 33,589 名患者接受了超声检查(78% 为女性;平均年龄 56 岁)。在 1997 年至 2019 年期间,每 10 万名受保人(定义为每年的受保人)的超声检查率在男性中增长了五倍(111.11-490.97),在女性中增长了四倍以上(382.27-1331.14)。FNAB率也随着时间的推移而增加(每十万人的比率:女性为174.09-430.37,男性为58.38-189.13)。总体而言,每次超声检查的 FNAB 率随时间变化不大,男性每次超声检查的 FNAB 率高于女性(Adj 比率 = 1.06 [置信区间 1.01-1.11])。在研究期间,女性的癌症发病率较高,但每例 FNAB 的癌症发病率在两性之间相似(均为 0.06,P = 0.4)。结论:甲状腺超声检查率的性别差异非常明显,这可能是甲状腺癌发病率性别差异的一个驱动因素。有趣的是,超声触发的FNAB在男性中更为常见,而且随着时间的推移变化不大,这对女性甲状腺癌发病率远高于男性的普遍认识提出了挑战。虽然FNAB和癌症的性别差异在人群中很大,但在接受超声检查的人群中差异很小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Thyroid
Thyroid 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
195
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: This authoritative journal program, including the monthly flagship journal Thyroid, Clinical Thyroidology® (monthly), and VideoEndocrinology™ (quarterly), delivers in-depth coverage on topics from clinical application and primary care, to the latest advances in diagnostic imaging and surgical techniques and technologies, designed to optimize patient care and outcomes. Thyroid is the leading, peer-reviewed resource for original articles, patient-focused reports, and translational research on thyroid cancer and all thyroid related diseases. The Journal delivers the latest findings on topics from primary care to clinical application, and is the exclusive source for the authoritative and updated American Thyroid Association (ATA) Guidelines for Managing Thyroid Disease.
期刊最新文献
Examining Why Thyroid Cancer Incidence Is High in Women. Differential Ultrasound Rates Mirror Sex Disparities in Thyroid Cancer. Irwin Klein, MD (1946-2024). Surgical and Pathological Challenges in Thyroidectomy after Thermal Ablation of Thyroid Nodules. Association Between Environmental Air Pollution and Thyroid Cancer and Nodules: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1