Parents' mental health after termination of pregnancy for foetal anomaly - a systematic review.

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1080/02646838.2024.2431638
Ida Rønnov-Jessen, Mette Eklund, Anne Hammer, Maja O'Connor, Christina Prinds, Dorte Hvidtjørn
{"title":"Parents' mental health after termination of pregnancy for foetal anomaly - a systematic review.","authors":"Ida Rønnov-Jessen, Mette Eklund, Anne Hammer, Maja O'Connor, Christina Prinds, Dorte Hvidtjørn","doi":"10.1080/02646838.2024.2431638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims/background: </strong>Terminating a desired pregnancy due to foetal anomalies has been linked to significant distress. It is however less clear what long-term psychological implications the parents face in the aftermath. This systematic review aimed to explore the mental health outcomes of parents after the termination of pregnancy due to foetal anomaly (TOPFA) after gestational week 12 + 0.</p><p><strong>Design/methods: </strong>Following the PRISMA guidelines and using the PEO (Problem, Exposure, Outcome) framework, we conducted a comprehensive search across six electronic databases. The search was restricted to English studies published since 2000. Eligible studies provided quantitative assessments of mental health outcomes post-TOPFA. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Given the heterogeneity in outcome measures, the findings were synthesised narratively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2261 papers identified, 11 studies (four cross-sectional and seven cohort studies) were included. Results demonstrated variations in symptoms of trauma-related stress, depressive symptoms, and grief reactions across the different studies post-TOPFA. Variations were found to be related to time since TOPFA and the difference in assessment tools used. Factors investigated as predictors of mental health outcomes, including gestational age, educational level, and religion, showed inconsistent findings, though partner support consistently correlated with lower levels of grief. Male partners, included in two studies, generally reported fewer symptoms of psychological distress.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review explores a range of mental health outcomes and highlights the need for better quality studies that consider the psychological impact of TOPFA on partners. Further, this systematic review stresses the need of standardisation in measurement tools for assessing mental health symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":47721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-28"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2024.2431638","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims/background: Terminating a desired pregnancy due to foetal anomalies has been linked to significant distress. It is however less clear what long-term psychological implications the parents face in the aftermath. This systematic review aimed to explore the mental health outcomes of parents after the termination of pregnancy due to foetal anomaly (TOPFA) after gestational week 12 + 0.

Design/methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines and using the PEO (Problem, Exposure, Outcome) framework, we conducted a comprehensive search across six electronic databases. The search was restricted to English studies published since 2000. Eligible studies provided quantitative assessments of mental health outcomes post-TOPFA. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Given the heterogeneity in outcome measures, the findings were synthesised narratively.

Results: Of the 2261 papers identified, 11 studies (four cross-sectional and seven cohort studies) were included. Results demonstrated variations in symptoms of trauma-related stress, depressive symptoms, and grief reactions across the different studies post-TOPFA. Variations were found to be related to time since TOPFA and the difference in assessment tools used. Factors investigated as predictors of mental health outcomes, including gestational age, educational level, and religion, showed inconsistent findings, though partner support consistently correlated with lower levels of grief. Male partners, included in two studies, generally reported fewer symptoms of psychological distress.

Conclusion: This review explores a range of mental health outcomes and highlights the need for better quality studies that consider the psychological impact of TOPFA on partners. Further, this systematic review stresses the need of standardisation in measurement tools for assessing mental health symptoms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
因胎儿畸形而终止妊娠后父母的心理健康--系统综述。
目的/背景:因胎儿畸形而终止理想的妊娠会给父母带来巨大的痛苦。然而,目前还不太清楚父母在终止妊娠后会面临哪些长期的心理影响。本系统性综述旨在探讨妊娠12+0周后因胎儿异常终止妊娠(TOPFA)后父母的心理健康结果:按照 PRISMA 指南并使用 PEO(问题、暴露、结果)框架,我们对六个电子数据库进行了全面检索。搜索仅限于 2000 年以来发表的英文研究。符合条件的研究对 TOPFA 后的心理健康结果进行了定量评估。研究质量采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)进行评估。考虑到结果测量的异质性,我们对研究结果进行了叙述性综合:在确定的 2261 篇论文中,纳入了 11 项研究(4 项横断面研究和 7 项队列研究)。研究结果表明,在不同的研究中,创伤相关应激症状、抑郁症状和 TOPFA 后的悲伤反应均存在差异。研究发现,这些差异与TOPFA之后的时间以及所使用的评估工具不同有关。作为预测心理健康结果的因素,包括妊娠年龄、教育水平和宗教信仰,研究结果并不一致,但伴侣的支持始终与较低的悲伤程度相关。在两项研究中,男性伴侣通常报告的心理困扰症状较少:本综述探讨了一系列心理健康结果,并强调有必要开展质量更高的研究,以考虑 TOPFA 对伴侣的心理影响。此外,本系统综述还强调了评估心理健康症状的测量工具标准化的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology
Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology reports and reviews outstanding research on psychological, behavioural, medical and social aspects of human reproduction, pregnancy and infancy. Medical topics focus on obstetrics and gynaecology, paediatrics and psychiatry. The growing work in relevant aspects of medical communication and medical sociology are also covered. Relevant psychological work includes developmental psychology, clinical psychology, social psychology, behavioural medicine, psychology of women and health psychology. Research into psychological aspects of midwifery, health visiting and nursing is central to the interests of the Journal. The Journal is of special value to those concerned with interdisciplinary issues. As a result, the Journal is of particular interest to those concerned with fundamental processes in behaviour and to issues of health promotion and service organization.
期刊最新文献
Parents' mental health after termination of pregnancy for foetal anomaly - a systematic review. Reproductive timing and social egg freezing within British South Asian communities: a qualitative study. Barriers to psychological support following early miscarriage. Perspectives of the UK-based IAPT perinatal champion. A longitudinal examination of contributors to new parents' perception of their infant. Effect of midwives' attitudes towards evidence-based practices on mothers' perceptions regarding childbirth practices and satisfaction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1