dP/dtmax: An underestimated prognostic factor in large animal infarction model

Q1 Health Professions Animal models and experimental medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1002/ame2.12502
Rita Garamvölgyi, Dénes Kőrösi, Ottó Tátrai, Emőke Bodor, Dániel Fajtai, Kornélia Farkas, András Vorobcsuk
{"title":"dP/dtmax: An underestimated prognostic factor in large animal infarction model","authors":"Rita Garamvölgyi,&nbsp;Dénes Kőrösi,&nbsp;Ottó Tátrai,&nbsp;Emőke Bodor,&nbsp;Dániel Fajtai,&nbsp;Kornélia Farkas,&nbsp;András Vorobcsuk","doi":"10.1002/ame2.12502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The present study aims to establish a reproducible large animal experimental unit using a minipig model to monitor cardiac function changes. A 90-min closed-chest balloon occlusion of the left anterior descending branch of the coronary artery was used to induce myocardial infarction in Pannon minipigs. To monitor the cardiac function, measurements were made by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI), invasive pressure monitoring, and a Pulse index Continuous Cardiac Output (PiCCO) hemodynamic system at 0, 72, and 720 h during the follow-up period. End-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (EDV, ESV), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) obtained by cMRI evaluation, global ejection fraction and aortic dP/dt<sub>max</sub> obtained by the invasive method, were recorded and compared. The 72- and 720-h EDV data showed a significant increase (<i>p</i> = 0.012, &lt;0.001) compared to baseline, and the Day 30 data showed a significant increase compared to Day 3 (<i>p</i> = 0.022). The ESV 72 h after the infarction showed a significant increase (<i>p</i> = 0.001) compared to baseline, which did not change significantly by Day 30 (<i>p</i> = 0.781) compared to Day 3. EDV and ESV were significantly negatively correlated with aortic dp<sub>max</sub>, and ESV was significantly correlated with LVEF. For LVEF and dP<sub>max</sub>, a significant (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001 and <i>p</i> = 0.002) worsening was demonstrated at Day 3 compared to baseline, which was no longer statistically detectable for LVEF at Day 30 (<i>p</i> = 0.141), while the difference for dP<sub>max</sub> was maintained (<i>p</i> = 0.002). The complementary use of PiCCO hemodynamic measurements in large animal models makes the previously used methodologies more robust and reliable.</p>","PeriodicalId":93869,"journal":{"name":"Animal models and experimental medicine","volume":"8 1","pages":"171-178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ame2.12502","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal models and experimental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ame2.12502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study aims to establish a reproducible large animal experimental unit using a minipig model to monitor cardiac function changes. A 90-min closed-chest balloon occlusion of the left anterior descending branch of the coronary artery was used to induce myocardial infarction in Pannon minipigs. To monitor the cardiac function, measurements were made by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI), invasive pressure monitoring, and a Pulse index Continuous Cardiac Output (PiCCO) hemodynamic system at 0, 72, and 720 h during the follow-up period. End-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (EDV, ESV), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) obtained by cMRI evaluation, global ejection fraction and aortic dP/dtmax obtained by the invasive method, were recorded and compared. The 72- and 720-h EDV data showed a significant increase (p = 0.012, <0.001) compared to baseline, and the Day 30 data showed a significant increase compared to Day 3 (p = 0.022). The ESV 72 h after the infarction showed a significant increase (p = 0.001) compared to baseline, which did not change significantly by Day 30 (p = 0.781) compared to Day 3. EDV and ESV were significantly negatively correlated with aortic dpmax, and ESV was significantly correlated with LVEF. For LVEF and dPmax, a significant (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002) worsening was demonstrated at Day 3 compared to baseline, which was no longer statistically detectable for LVEF at Day 30 (p = 0.141), while the difference for dPmax was maintained (p = 0.002). The complementary use of PiCCO hemodynamic measurements in large animal models makes the previously used methodologies more robust and reliable.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
dP/dtmax:大型动物脑梗塞模型中被低估的预后因素。
本研究旨在利用迷你猪模型建立一个可重复的大型动物实验单元,以监测心脏功能的变化。通过90分钟闭胸球囊闭塞冠状动脉左前降支,诱发潘农小型猪心肌梗死。为了监测心功能,在随访期间的0、72和720小时,通过心脏磁共振成像(cMRI)、有创压力监测和脉冲指数连续心输出量(PiCCO)血流动力学系统进行了测量。记录并比较了舒张末和收缩末容积(EDV、ESV)、cMRI 评估获得的左心室射血分数(LVEF)、有创方法获得的整体射血分数和主动脉 dP/dtmax。72小时和720小时的EDV数据显示,ESV与LVEF显著相关(最大值,p = 0.012),72小时和720小时的EDV数据显示,ESV与LVEF显著相关(最大值,p = 0.012)。对于 LVEF 和 dPmax,则保持了明显的(p max)(p = 0.002)。在大型动物模型中补充使用 PiCCO 血流动力学测量,使以前使用的方法更加稳健可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Disruption of the blood-brain barrier contributes to neurobehavioral changes observed in rheumatic heart disease. Astaxanthin ameliorates benzalkonium chloride-induced dry eye disease through suppressing inflammation and oxidative stress via Keap1-Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathways. Cover Picture Issue Information Development of a single-nucleotide polymorphism panel genotyping system for genetic analysis of Chinese hamsters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1