The Essential Components of Adult Critical Care Neuroscience Nursing Orientation: A Delphi Study.

Marianne Beare Vyas, Cynthia Bautista, Lorin Daniels, Mary McKenna Guanci, Lori Rhudy
{"title":"The Essential Components of Adult Critical Care Neuroscience Nursing Orientation: A Delphi Study.","authors":"Marianne Beare Vyas, Cynthia Bautista, Lorin Daniels, Mary McKenna Guanci, Lori Rhudy","doi":"10.1097/JNN.0000000000000807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>BACKGROUND: Critical care neuroscience nursing is a specialized field requiring a complex knowledge base and unique clinical orientation. A comprehensive orientation for nurses new to this specialty can improve retention, performance, and satisfaction. Critical care neuroscience orientations are often hospital based and regionally specific, and lack a systematic approach. The aim of this research was to obtain expert consensus on the essential components of a 12- to 18-week critical care neuroscience nursing orientation. METHODS: A Delphi methodology was used to collect expert consensus on the components of a critical care neuroscience nursing orientation. Electronic surveys were distributed to 161 neuroscience critical care orientation experts in 2 Delphi rounds. Participant demographic data and a Likert rating scale (1-5) of literature-based components of a critical care neuroscience orientation were collected. Participants identified additional critical care neuroscience orientation components that were not included in the listed components in round 1 or round 2 of the survey. RESULTS: Round 1 of the survey had 38 responses (23.6%), and round 2 had 23 responses (14.2%). The round 1 survey included 47 elements, and 36 of 47 met the a priori threshold of ≥75% consensus of being important or very important. Two additional elements resulted from write-in recommendations. In round 2, 38 elements were included in the survey, and 37 of 38 elements met consensus. Expert consensus on the essential components of a critical care neuroscience orientation included 37 elements divided among 5 major components. CONCLUSION: Expert consensus was achieved on the essential components of a 12- to 18-week adult critical care neuroscience nursing orientation. Five components and 37 elements were agreed upon by expert consensus.</p>","PeriodicalId":94240,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses","volume":" ","pages":"3-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Critical care neuroscience nursing is a specialized field requiring a complex knowledge base and unique clinical orientation. A comprehensive orientation for nurses new to this specialty can improve retention, performance, and satisfaction. Critical care neuroscience orientations are often hospital based and regionally specific, and lack a systematic approach. The aim of this research was to obtain expert consensus on the essential components of a 12- to 18-week critical care neuroscience nursing orientation. METHODS: A Delphi methodology was used to collect expert consensus on the components of a critical care neuroscience nursing orientation. Electronic surveys were distributed to 161 neuroscience critical care orientation experts in 2 Delphi rounds. Participant demographic data and a Likert rating scale (1-5) of literature-based components of a critical care neuroscience orientation were collected. Participants identified additional critical care neuroscience orientation components that were not included in the listed components in round 1 or round 2 of the survey. RESULTS: Round 1 of the survey had 38 responses (23.6%), and round 2 had 23 responses (14.2%). The round 1 survey included 47 elements, and 36 of 47 met the a priori threshold of ≥75% consensus of being important or very important. Two additional elements resulted from write-in recommendations. In round 2, 38 elements were included in the survey, and 37 of 38 elements met consensus. Expert consensus on the essential components of a critical care neuroscience orientation included 37 elements divided among 5 major components. CONCLUSION: Expert consensus was achieved on the essential components of a 12- to 18-week adult critical care neuroscience nursing orientation. Five components and 37 elements were agreed upon by expert consensus.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人重症监护神经科学护理指导的基本要素:德尔菲研究。
摘要:背景:重症神经科学护理是一个专业领域,需要复杂的知识基础和独特的临床导向。为新进入该专业的护士提供全面的指导可以提高留用率、绩效和满意度。重症监护神经科学的入门指导通常以医院为基础,针对特定地区,缺乏系统的方法。本研究旨在就为期 12 至 18 周的重症监护神经科学护理指导的基本内容达成专家共识。方法:采用德尔菲法收集专家对重症神经科学护理指导内容的共识。在两轮德尔菲调查中,向 161 名神经科学危重症护理指导专家发放了电子调查问卷。调查收集了参与者的人口统计学数据和基于文献的重症神经科学护理指导要素的李克特评分表(1-5)。参与者还指出了第一轮或第二轮调查中未列出的其他重症监护神经科学指导内容。结果:第一轮调查有 38 份回复(23.6%),第二轮调查有 23 份回复(14.2%)。第一轮调查包括 47 个要素,其中 36 个要素达到了先验阈值,即≥75% 的人一致认为重要或非常重要。另外两个要素来自书面建议。在第二轮调查中,有 38 个要素被纳入调查,38 个要素中有 37 个达到共识。专家就重症监护神经科学导向的基本要素达成的共识包括 5 大要素中的 37 个要素。结论:专家就为期 12 至 18 周的成人重症神经科学护理指导的基本内容达成了共识。专家一致同意 5 个组成部分和 37 个要素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Integrating the Fundamentals of Care When Caring for Patients With Neurological Disorders: Where to Start? Analysis of Factors and Clinical Outcomes of Planned Tracheal Extubation Failure in Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit Patients. Analysis of Factors and Clinical Outcomes of Planned Tracheal Extubation Failure in Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit Patients. Development and Evaluation of a Care Needs Scale for Parents of Children With Tourette Syndrome. The Effect of Interventions on Quality of Life, Depression, and the Burden of Care of Stroke Patients and Their Caregivers: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1